| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-25 | |||
| 16:27:31 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs to instance_extra https://review.openstack.org/537897 | |
| 16:27:32 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_image_certificates to REST API https://review.openstack.org/486204 | |
| 16:27:32 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Implement certificate_utils https://review.openstack.org/479949 | |
| 16:27:51 | mriedem | gmann: here is the patch that adds the nova-multiattach job to tempest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537957/ | |
| 16:30:44 | Tengu | sahid: hello! are you here? | |
| 16:32:52 | efried | jaypipes I've now noticed that weird stalling behavior without having rechecked anything nearby, so it was probably just coincidence. I still don't like it, though. | |
| 16:33:33 | Tengu | sean-k-mooney: hello! are you here? | |
| 16:34:16 | Tengu | mriedem: I was sent back here in order to get info from either sahid or sean-k-mooney - as they are the devs of the os-vif-core :). Pretty sure they will know a bit more about my issue. | |
| 16:35:28 | Tengu | :) | |
| 16:45:36 | efried | gibi stephenfin If you're still around, care to push this 'un? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536624/ | |
| 16:47:58 | efried | or mriedem dansmith if you don't mind jumping into the middle of this series. The change itself is fairly small and straightforward, though understanding how and where it fits in is a bigger job. | |
| 16:49:45 | ameeda | gmann: can you please check this "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526900/" ? | |
| 16:50:36 | stephenfin | efried: Yeah, I can grab that | |
| 16:50:41 | efried | stephenfin Thanks! | |
| 16:51:00 | mriedem | looking | |
| 16:51:04 | mriedem | why was it using sets? | |
| 16:51:14 | gibi | efried: done | |
| 16:51:16 | mriedem | and are there problems if we're not ensuring uniqueness now? | |
| 16:51:31 | efried | gibi Thanks! stephenfin ^ | |
| 16:51:36 | gibi | stephenfin: sorry | |
| 16:51:47 | stephenfin | gibi: Nope, suits me :) | |
| 16:51:49 | efried | mriedem The only real reason it was using sets before was for O(1) operations. | |
| 16:51:59 | stephenfin | bauzas has been bugging me about this vGPU thing anyway | |
| 16:52:10 | mriedem | stephenfin: the vgpu stuff is all approved | |
| 16:52:14 | efried | mriedem And as super-double-insurance that we don't have cycles in the "tree". But that's prevented elsewise in a number of ways. | |
| 16:52:16 | stephenfin | Ha! | |
| 16:52:22 | stephenfin | I should work on bugs more often | |
| 16:52:25 | mriedem | god this provider tree stuff, | |
| 16:52:31 | stephenfin | Everyone does my work for me | |
| 16:52:43 | mriedem | all reminds me of some graph traversal stuff i wrote like 10 years ago at ibm | |
| 16:52:54 | efried | mriedem But the trees should be small enough that O(lognN) is no big deal, and is a rounding error anyway against all the placement API calls that feed it. | |
| 16:52:57 | mriedem | back when i was young and smart | |
| 16:53:20 | efried | Not sure how that makes me feel, considering I'm older than you (pretty sure) | |
| 16:53:36 | mriedem | <- 36 | |
| 16:53:40 | efried | 41 | |
| 16:53:44 | mriedem | jesus you're old | |
| 16:53:47 | efried | ikr | |
| 16:53:54 | efried | Man, when I was 36 I could do anything. | |
| 16:54:07 | efried | Now I sound like a bowl of rice krispies getting out of bed. | |
| 16:55:25 | efried | So anyway, I think I now have 8 patches at the mercy of zuul. Bottom one of that series has been thrashing around for three full days. | |
| 16:55:36 | mriedem | ooo nice osc-placement docs are published https://docs.openstack.org/osc-placement/latest/ | |
| 16:57:40 | mriedem | and releasenotes, although the version isn't what i expected https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/osc-placement/unreleased.html | |
| 16:59:16 | edmondsw | stephenfin if you're looking for something to review... :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526094/ | |
| 16:59:49 | stephenfin | edmondsw: Darn, I thought I'd got away with the powerVM stuff | |
| 17:00:01 | edmondsw | and they just reel ya back in... | |
| 17:00:07 | edmondsw | that's the last one | |
| 17:01:13 | dansmith | efried: looks like that set has a pretty healthy set of +2+W already, up to a patch with a -1 and no response | |
| 17:03:30 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Resolve nits from I552688b9ee32b719a576a7a9ed5e4d5aa31d7b3f https://review.openstack.org/537971 | |
| 17:03:45 | stephenfin | mriedem, melwitt: Fancy pushing that through? ^ | |
| 17:04:50 | mriedem | stephenfin: i know you love to `` everything | |
| 17:04:54 | mriedem | but that's going to look weird in a shell | |
| 17:05:56 | stephenfin | Yeah, that's a good point actually | |
| 17:06:04 | stephenfin | cliff should probably strip those | |
| 17:06:05 | mriedem | it's the best point i've ever made i think | |
| 17:07:11 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Resolve nits from I552688b9ee32b719a576a7a9ed5e4d5aa31d7b3f https://review.openstack.org/537971 | |
| 17:10:01 | mriedem | stephenfin: you didn't even have nits in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536858/ :) | |
| 17:10:26 | stephenfin | Let's call it muscle memory | |
| 17:10:45 | stephenfin | Or me not waiting for the CI to build docs before approving them 🙈 | |
| 17:11:32 | dansmith | er, I guess that one is not part of the main stack | |
| 17:11:48 | jlvillal | stephenfin, dansmith mriedem: You may want to move your jobs out of the Zuul 'integrated' queue. | |
| 17:12:04 | jlvillal | We (Ironic) set our queue as 'ironic' | |
| 17:12:20 | jlvillal | I notice the 'integrated' queue is enormous at the moment. | |
| 17:12:25 | jlvillal | http://zuul.openstack.org/ | |
| 17:12:29 | dansmith | jlvillal: um, what? doesn't that mean you don't co-gate with other projects? | |
| 17:12:44 | jlvillal | dansmith, Yeah. | |
| 17:12:54 | mriedem | kind of defeats the purpose of gating | |
| 17:12:59 | dansmith | doesn't that defeat the whole thing we're doing here? | |
| 17:13:00 | dansmith | yeah. | |
| 17:13:07 | jlvillal | Well we gate with our patches. | |
| 17:13:30 | dansmith | right, but it means you don't get tested against ours, and we don't get tested with yours | |
| 17:13:30 | jlvillal | But yeah, not with cinder, glance, nova, etc... | |
| 17:14:28 | jlvillal | True. We did that after we migrated over. | |
| 17:14:37 | mriedem | can someone turn on the sdague signal | |
| 17:14:43 | jlvillal | Not sure if the tradeoffs are worth it or not. | |
| 17:15:43 | jlvillal | Too bad they don't have a 'depend' on queue. Instead of everyone goes in the same bucket queue | |
| 17:17:17 | dansmith | jlvillal: depends-on between queues just makes it one queue no? | |
| 17:18:57 | jlvillal | dansmith, Not a gerrit depends-on for one. | |
| 17:19:29 | jlvillal | dansmith, Now if 'ironic' depends on 'nova'. And 'glance' depends on 'nova' But ironic and glance don't depend on each other. | |
| 17:20:01 | jlvillal | dansmith, So in the gate queue a failed glance wouldn't cause the ironic job to get re-queued. | |
| 17:20:32 | jlvillal | dansmith, They do not have this idea of a 'depend' in zuul queues. There is just a queue. | |
| 17:20:42 | jlvillal | It was a random idea. | |
| 17:21:03 | dansmith | I see what you mean, but I'm not sure the benefit is worth that complexity | |
| 17:21:54 | jlvillal | dansmith, Yeah probably right. I just saw your nova jobs that have been 18 hours + in the gate queue. So that is why I mentioned it. | |
| 17:22:11 | dansmith | yeah, we're definitely feeling that pain, but.. | |
| 17:34:49 | mriedem | gibi: once the two approved versioned notification transformation changes are merged https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/versioned-notification-transformation-queens+status:open i'm going to close that bp and open another one for rocky for anything left | |
| 17:38:06 | mriedem | so is bauzas out today? | |
| 17:38:22 | dansmith | apparently | |
| 17:38:38 | dansmith | he's not on our calendar as being out, but I've pinged him a few times yesterday and today already and haven't seen any response | |
| 17:39:03 | dansmith | he was doing some conf thing earlier in the week, but I'm surprised he hasn't popped back up yet | |
| 17:48:15 | mriedem | oh right snowbunnies | |
| 17:55:23 | jackie-truong | dansmith: RE: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537728/ | |
| 17:55:33 | jackie-truong | dansmith: I wasn't sure if we needed to reassign instance._context | |
| 17:55:44 | jackie-truong | dansmith: The more I look at it, I'm thinking "no" | |
| 17:55:49 | jackie-truong | dansmith: Should I remove? | |
| 17:56:11 | dansmith | jackie-truong: it's done on L342 why would you have to do it again? | |
| 17:56:37 | jackie-truong | dansmith: i was a little confused as to how things were getting passed around | |
| 17:56:57 | dansmith | jackie-truong: you're calling that method :) | |
| 17:57:13 | dansmith | jackie-truong: it's set on instance above, then you pass it to another method, so... it's still set | |
| 17:57:28 | jackie-truong | dansmith: kk i'll remove | |
| 17:59:14 | jackie-truong | outlook pop-ups ;-) | |