Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-01-24
18:25:26 dansmith I think I still get something
18:25:40 dansmith Its value may be silently ignored in the future
18:25:40 dansmith /dan/nova/.tox/py27/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:623: UserWarning: Policy "os_compute_api:os-extended-volumes":"rule:admin_or_owner" was deprecated for removal in 17.0.0. Reason: Nova API extension concept has been removed in Pike. Those extensions have their own policies enforcement. As there is no extensions now, "os_compute_api:os-extended-volumes" policy which was added for extensions is not needed any more.
18:25:48 dansmith I think the rule:admin_or_owner bit is new now
18:26:43 lbragstad dansmith: oh nice
18:26:55 dansmith hmm, actually, no
18:27:02 dansmith I backed out the change and I get the same exact thing
18:28:22 lbragstad weird - that's still emitting https://github.com/openstack/oslo.policy/blob/master/oslo_policy/policy.py#L615-L625
18:29:48 lbragstad huh...
18:29:51 lbragstad actually...
18:30:01 lbragstad it looks like it's writing everything to disk
18:30:15 lbragstad regardless of it being in fake_policy or not
18:30:22 lbragstad https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/policy_fixture.py#L96
18:30:34 dansmith yup
18:30:44 dansmith per sdague's comment above I assume
18:30:54 lbragstad yeah
18:31:13 lbragstad this must have been around before the default in code efforts
18:31:33 dansmith I feel like it cropped up between when I left last year and popped up this year
18:31:54 lbragstad https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/eacdbc3d8e9042c584c751d599da59ddcaf98a1c
18:36:09 lbragstad dansmith: trying a workaround hack with http://paste.openstack.org/raw/652502/
18:36:14 lbragstad checking if i can recreate locally
18:36:28 dansmith ah that seems nice
18:37:18 lbragstad ^ that fixes it for me
18:38:53 lbragstad http://paste.openstack.org/show/652509/ without the fix...
18:39:07 lbragstad er... "fix", no idea if that's how we want to work around it
18:39:45 lbragstad with the workaround http://paste.openstack.org/show/652513/
18:40:54 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reduce policy deprecation warnings in test runs https://review.openstack.org/537603
18:40:54 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated policies from fake_policy https://review.openstack.org/537602
18:42:03 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reduce policy deprecation warnings in test runs https://review.openstack.org/537603
18:42:31 dansmith lbragstad: remove the WIP?
18:43:01 lbragstad done
18:43:04 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/nova master: Reduce policy deprecation warnings in test runs https://review.openstack.org/537603
18:43:29 dansmith lbragstad: thanks!
18:44:13 lbragstad dansmith: no problem - thanks for the heads up... not sure if all those policies need to be there, but at least it doesn't spam as bad
18:45:03 mriedem dansmith: do we still need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537600/ ?
18:45:21 mriedem oh i guess so
18:56:37 mriedem stephenfin: melwitt: umm https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523958/
18:56:44 mriedem could we not have red hat cores approving red hat changes?
19:01:22 melwitt mriedem: sorry about that. I have asked red hatters not to approve red hat changes that I've +2ed so I think this was just an oversight. downgrading my vote to +1
19:01:45 melwitt er, I guess that doesn't help because I'm not the approver
19:02:16 dansmith yeah, it won't help :(
19:02:19 dansmith a -2 will, but..
19:02:39 dansmith it will also reset the gate if it's already there
19:02:59 mriedem we do'nt need to pull it out,
19:03:07 mriedem i'm not going to review it in depth at this point
19:03:38 mriedem the commit message obviously shows there was thought put into it
19:03:46 dansmith lol
19:04:08 artom It's that suave British accent, isn't it?
19:04:23 mriedem who wrote the commit message, lee or booth?
19:04:57 mriedem anywho,
19:05:00 mriedem btw,
19:05:10 mriedem the live migration job runs with ceph i think,
19:05:21 mriedem but i guess we don't enable volume-backed live migratoin do we,
19:05:34 mriedem and even if we did, we don't have a tempest test for encrypted volume-backed live migration to run with ceph
19:05:42 mriedem but we do have new enough libvirt and qemu in the pike UCA to test this
19:06:02 mriedem heh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536177/
19:09:30 melwitt mriedem: I have a patch up to enable it but it looks like it's hitting legit problems https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528104/
19:10:23 mriedem melwitt: is there supposed to be at least even a release note anywhere in this series?
19:10:32 mriedem because given the commit message, it seems pretty complicated
19:10:53 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-placement master: CLI for resource classes (v1.2) https://review.openstack.org/511182
19:10:53 mriedem or some kind of advertisement anywhere about 'hey you can do this thing now with libvirt and encrypted volumes'
19:14:55 melwitt mriedem: I think there's no release note because it's automatic, that is, operators don't have to do anything, it will use native luks decryption if available. but now that you mention it, it might be helpful to mention that it will use native decryption if qemu and libvirt version combination support it
19:15:41 mriedem right, i mean, unless this is totally rock solid, and shit starts randomly failing, operators are probably going to want to know that something new is going on here
19:16:57 melwitt yeah, I agree with that
19:17:24 artom Heh, we talked about this in the spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490824/5/specs/queens/approved/libvirt-qemu-native-luks.rst@98
19:17:31 artom And then promptly forgot about it :(
19:20:11 dhellmann mriedem : is https://review.openstack.org/516385 of any interest or should I just abandon that?
19:23:29 mriedem dhellmann: it is of the utmost interest
19:23:55 dhellmann mriedem : ok. I'll leave it open then until someone has a minute to review it.
19:24:01 mriedem dhellmann: already did
19:24:02 mriedem :)
19:24:04 dhellmann :-)
19:24:05 dhellmann thanks
19:24:34 mriedem melwitt: didn't lee say he was going to be out a bit this week? do you think you could take a stab at a release note?
19:24:38 mriedem since you know the change
19:24:43 mriedem as a patch on top of course
19:24:44 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Add unit test for non-placement resize https://review.openstack.org/537614
19:24:53 mriedem edleafe: thanks for that
19:25:04 edleafe mriedem: np
19:25:22 melwitt mriedem: sure, will do
19:25:28 mriedem melwitt: thanks
19:25:35 mriedem then i guess we can close that one out for queens
19:26:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-placement master: Address review comments from allocations patch https://review.openstack.org/536871
19:27:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-placement master: Usage docs and initial release note for osc-placement https://review.openstack.org/536858
19:28:05 mriedem the cinder gate fix has been promoted btw
19:28:13 mriedem so hopefully stuff starts merging again soon
19:35:35 melwitt that's super news ++
19:38:39 openstackgerrit Mark Goddard proposed openstack/nova master: Unplug all VIFs from ironic nodes during tear down https://review.openstack.org/537626
19:49:55 dansmith melwitt: mriedem tssurya: do we need to have a cells meeting today? I've got nothing new to talk abotu
19:50:43 archit msg amodi identify titanic123
19:51:11 dansmith whoopsie :)
19:51:13 archit lol
19:51:20 archit yep .:(
19:51:27 melwitt dansmith: I don't have anything new either
19:51:28 efried swhy I always do those in the status channel
19:51:35 mriedem dansmith: there are no major new bugs that i'm aware of,
19:51:40 mriedem and the resize + alternate hosts change is approved
19:51:49 efried Is this cinder bug going to affect all patches?
19:51:58 mriedem efried: anything that runs tempest api tests
19:52:01 mriedem so all dsvm jobs

Earlier   Later