| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-12-18 | |||
| 17:31:14 | jaypipes | stephenfin: cool, will look in a bit. | |
| 17:31:48 | stephenfin | jaypipes: Cheers :) I think that should satisfy most things. Only odd condition I had was what happened when two similar aliases requested different NUMA policies. I ruled that out as daft | |
| 17:32:01 | stephenfin | and now I've to run home. Ciao o/ | |
| 17:32:06 | jaypipes | ciao | |
| 17:37:21 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send soft_delete from context manager https://review.openstack.org/476459 | |
| 17:37:21 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform missing delete notifications https://review.openstack.org/410297 | |
| 17:55:26 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support for the 2.57 microversion https://review.openstack.org/528128 | |
| 18:00:43 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: allow compute nodes to be associated with host agg https://review.openstack.org/526753 | |
| 18:06:46 | cdent | that's not what makes you evil mriedem | |
| 18:07:11 | mriedem | |..|_ | |
| 18:13:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support for the 2.57 microversion https://review.openstack.org/528128 | |
| 18:26:31 | jaypipes | mriedem: how exactly can an instance group (server group) have >1 policy? :( | |
| 18:27:05 | mriedem | can't | |
| 18:27:29 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415482/ | |
| 18:27:35 | jaypipes | mriedem: then why is objects.InstanceGroup.policies a ListOfStringsField? | |
| 18:27:40 | mriedem | ^ | |
| 18:27:43 | mriedem | "legacy reasons" | |
| 18:27:47 | jaypipes | uhg | |
| 18:27:49 | jaypipes | k | |
| 18:29:06 | mriedem | nice, we also have a separate dedicated table for the policies | |
| 18:29:13 | mriedem | instance_group_policy | |
| 18:29:41 | jaypipes | I know... it's just... sigh... | |
| 18:30:02 | mriedem | we can microversion that out of the api | |
| 18:30:14 | mriedem | and redo things in the data model if we actually cared | |
| 18:31:05 | mriedem | looking at the old wiki for the bp https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/InstanceGroupApiExtension#API | |
| 18:31:14 | mriedem | it sounds like multiple policies was by design | |
| 18:31:23 | mriedem | for affinity and QoS, as examples | |
| 18:35:37 | jaypipes | mriedem: I'm just trying to get this stuff hacked up and working for Ironic... | |
| 18:35:52 | jaypipes | mriedem: the real solution (distances and stuff like that) probably won't look like this. | |
| 18:36:02 | jaypipes | mriedem: because I hate the server group functionality to begin with. | |
| 18:36:14 | mriedem | i know, i've seen the tatto | |
| 18:36:16 | mriedem | *tatoo | |
| 18:36:21 | jaypipes | attoo? :) | |
| 18:36:26 | jaypipes | tattoo? :) | |
| 18:36:27 | mriedem | no | |
| 18:36:38 | mriedem | i've given up on trying to ever spell it correctly | |
| 18:36:42 | jaypipes | lol | |
| 18:36:44 | mriedem | so now it's just whatever the last thing i said | |
| 18:42:16 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: sort parameters for limits, quotas and quota classes https://review.openstack.org/528786 | |
| 18:44:47 | jaypipes | mriedem: where is the latest microversion for the compute API found? | |
| 18:45:06 | jaypipes | mriedem: in placement, it's a constant in the nova/api/openstack/placement/microversion.py file. | |
| 18:47:06 | artom | jaypipes, nova/api/openstack/api_version_request.py has _MAX_API_VERSION | |
| 18:47:14 | jaypipes | artom: ty sir! | |
| 19:02:15 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM driver: ovs vif https://review.openstack.org/422512 | |
| 19:22:31 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Remove microversion fallback code from report client https://review.openstack.org/528794 | |
| 19:25:14 | cdent | that ^ may have some holes | |
| 19:30:50 | openstackgerrit | Jackie Truong proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_image_certificates to REST API https://review.openstack.org/486204 | |
| 19:43:15 | kumarmn | Could these changes by mriedem get merged? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527228/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527468/ | |
| 19:43:31 | kumarmn | They are holding me from tagging trove for queens-2. | |
| 19:43:56 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: Make request_spec.spec MediumText https://review.openstack.org/528332 | |
| 19:44:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/newton: Make request_spec.spec MediumText https://review.openstack.org/528338 | |
| 19:45:03 | mriedem | kumarmn: need to find another core to +W | |
| 19:45:11 | mriedem | slim pickins right now | |
| 19:45:14 | mriedem | jaypipes: ? ^ | |
| 19:45:20 | mriedem | oomichi: ^ | |
| 19:45:55 | melwitt | oh, stable cores. I was like, what about me!! | |
| 19:45:58 | jaypipes | mriedem: I'm not a stable core. | |
| 19:46:08 | mriedem | artom: i rev'ed the newton and ocata backports to fix the git commit hash to point at the updated ocata/pike commits, respectively | |
| 19:46:16 | mriedem | jaypipes: no, not the stable patches | |
| 19:46:26 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527228/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527468/ | |
| 19:46:34 | mriedem | melwitt: you already +2ed them :) | |
| 19:46:53 | jaypipes | ah, ok. yeah, just a sec. | |
| 19:47:24 | melwitt | I too, thought they were the stable patches. too many links :D | |
| 19:48:57 | mriedem | melwitt: what if you were blue wagyu chopped liver? | |
| 19:49:02 | kumarmn | thanks mriedem, jaypipes, melwitt | |
| 19:49:39 | melwitt | that is a conundrum | |
| 19:52:54 | artom | mriedem, ah, thanks | |
| 19:54:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support for the 2.57 microversion https://review.openstack.org/528128 | |
| 19:55:45 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: rbd: flatten images when creating/unshelving an instance https://review.openstack.org/457886 | |
| 20:00:01 | jaypipes | mriedem: done | |
| 20:02:27 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 20:05:03 | mriedem | it the scheduler. i wonder if there is an easy way to make the cell conductor fail to hit the scheduler | |
| 20:05:03 | mriedem | edleafe: melwitt: i was thinking about something with the alternate hosts change during create server - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511358/ - there is no functional test in that change that shows we're actually using the alternate hosts. we already have at least a couple functional tests which use 2 hosts and make the first fail to trigger a reschedule. but that worked before this because the compute and cell conductor c | |
| 20:05:12 | mriedem | in our functional tests we're just running one conductor service | |
| 20:06:18 | windsn | Hi, Im having issues with trying to use nova with ironic.... I see this error in the nova-compute logs, https://thepasteb.in/p/pghQo0OnW5vcR, and when i create an ironic node, i dont see the nova-hypervisor-list getting populated with an entry for the ironic node... I'm not too sure what seems to be the issue | |
| 20:06:55 | mriedem | windsn: ocata, pike, master? | |
| 20:07:01 | windsn | Pike | |
| 20:07:36 | mriedem | windsn: have you run "nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts"? | |
| 20:08:09 | mriedem | edleafe: melwitt: an easy think we could do is just make a select_destinations fixture which blows up if it's called more than once... | |
| 20:08:50 | windsn | mriedem: No I haven't run that... I'm not sure what that does | |
| 20:08:51 | mriedem | otherwise i think we'd need to do something where we start a 2nd conductor service with modified transport_url/db connection, and modify the compute service to point at the cell transport_url also | |
| 20:09:17 | mriedem | windsn: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/cli/nova-manage.html#nova-cells-v2 | |
| 20:09:45 | edleafe | mriedem: I did think about doing something like that, but got tangled up in the multiple cell/conductor creation | |
| 20:10:14 | mriedem | edleafe: by default the tests are running with 2 cells, cell0 and cell1 (unless the SimpleCellFixture or whatever it's called is used) | |
| 20:10:36 | mriedem | so the trick would be running the cell conductor service and the compute service configured for the cell1 transport_url i think | |
| 20:10:49 | mriedem | but we use a fake mq so i'm not sure it would actually help anything | |
| 20:10:59 | edleafe | mriedem: ah, then I was trying for a third cell to show that it didn't touch the other cell | |
| 20:11:15 | edleafe | I guess I don't think of cell0 as a "real" cell | |
| 20:11:42 | mriedem | RPCFixture i think | |
| 20:12:23 | edleafe | mriedem: ok, I'll start playing around with that in a bit | |
| 20:13:13 | mriedem | looks like dan left a breadcrumb https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396417/23/nova/tests/fixtures.py | |
| 20:13:36 | cdent | dansel | |
| 20:14:10 | jaypipes | gdi, these server group functional tests are inscrutable. :( | |
| 20:14:17 | jaypipes | make me want to stab something. | |
| 20:14:23 | mriedem | anyway, just thought about this before digging into the ironic multinode reschedule failures | |
| 20:16:54 | jaypipes | AAAARRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH I frigggin hate the integrate test helpers. | |
| 20:17:19 | melwitt | jaypipes: one thing I learned about those tests is if you want to have scheduling consider > 1 compute host, you need a compute service and set_nodes per host | |
| 20:18:05 | jaypipes | melwitt: just doing a simple copy/paste of one of the "negative" server group func tests results in completely random NotFound errors from the faked-out image service... | |
| 20:18:13 | jaypipes | melwitt: makes no sense whatsoever. | |
| 20:18:25 | jaypipes | melwitt: and the tests are completely unintelligible. | |