Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-10-31
21:32:00	openstackgerrit	Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Change RPC for select_destinations() https://review.openstack.org/516707
21:32:01	openstackgerrit	Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Make conductor pass and use host_lists https://review.openstack.org/511358
21:51:34	efried	jaypipes Would you be *offended* if I added a functional test for _get_provider_ids_matching_all ?
21:51:41	jaypipes	efried: nope
21:51:55	jaypipes	efried: looking at your "other side" patch now.
21:51:57	efried	jaypipes Can I chuck it in the same change set?
21:52:04	jaypipes	efried: of course!
21:52:12	efried	(which entails rebasing the series)
21:54:21	jaypipes	efried: yup, go for it.
21:55:08	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: begin refactor AllocCandidates._get_by_filters() https://review.openstack.org/516778
21:55:09	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: build alloc request resources for shared resources https://review.openstack.org/516780
21:55:09	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: build ProviderSummary objects in sep function https://review.openstack.org/516779
21:55:10	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: finish refactor AllocCandidates._get_by_filters() https://review.openstack.org/516782
21:55:10	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: create allocation request for single provider https://review.openstack.org/516781
21:55:12	efried	jaypipes ^ -- It works. I don't understand it yet, but it works.
21:55:47	jaypipes	heh
22:13:29	openstackgerrit	C Leavett-Brown proposed openstack/nova master: Closes-Bug: 1728732 https://review.openstack.org/516796
22:13:31	openstack	bug 1728732 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "OpenStack nova service responds with an erroneous httpd redirect to a "GET,version_controller,show" request." [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1728732 - Assigned to Colin Leavett-Brown (crlb-f)
22:18:08	edleafe	efried: guess that's better than understanding it, but it doesn't work. :)
22:18:55	efried	edleafe I dunno. If more people understand it, but it doesn't work, more than one person could conceivably fix it.
22:19:16	efried	edleafe This is assuming, of course, that there are more people on the not-understanding side than on the understanding side.
22:20:15	efried	edleafe It may just be that this stuff is hard and I need to study it until it clicks. I'd be curious to see how SQL afficionados such as yourself perceive it.
22:20:33	efried	edleafe Talking specifically about the new method in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516778/
23:33:45	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Parse granular resources & traits https://review.openstack.org/514091
23:33:46	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Numbered groupings to GET /allocation_candidates https://review.openstack.org/514092
#openstack-nova - 2017-11-01
01:26:47	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: [placement] avoid case issues microversions in gabbits https://review.openstack.org/516662
02:17:19	jianghuaw	dansmith, alex_xu Could you have a look at this patch when you have time? -
02:17:20	jianghuaw	vgpu: add enabled white list : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512580/
02:19:32	jianghuaw	That's common dependent things for libvirt and xenapi on implementing vGPU feature. If that can be merged earlier, less rebasing needed and more easier for the following development work. Thanks.
02:20:03	jianghuaw	Thanks in advance.
02:22:37	alex_xu	jianghuaw: will try later
02:22:53	jianghuaw	alex_xu, thanks:-)
02:23:15	alex_xu	jianghuaw: np
03:30:27	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Add _get_providers_with_most_resource method https://review.openstack.org/514197
03:30:28	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Add _get_traits_by_rp_ids method https://review.openstack.org/511184
03:30:28	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Enable _get_usages_by_provider_and_rc not filter on the resource class id https://review.openstack.org/514649
03:30:29	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Add ProviderSummaryList object https://review.openstack.org/514198
03:30:30	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: placement: rewrite AllocationCandidates.get_by_filters https://review.openstack.org/479766
03:30:30	openstackgerrit	Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Add AggregatedProviderSummary and AggregatedProviderSummaryList objects https://review.openstack.org/514200
04:26:08	openstackgerrit	Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge flavor extensions controller code https://review.openstack.org/516104
05:04:57	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/511035
06:30:05	openstackgerrit	Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP]Add pagination and Changes-since filter support for os-migrations. https://review.openstack.org/330406
06:32:13	openstackgerrit	Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: get vGPU stats from hypervisor https://review.openstack.org/512965
06:36:57	openstackgerrit	Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: provide vGPU inventory in compute node https://review.openstack.org/516217
06:44:01	Zoya	Hello everyone..In my deployment at one stage nova-compute is being enabled..i.e., one feature is starting nova-compute
06:45:33	Zoya	I need to stop this...But I can't touch the feature which is starting nova-compute..Is there any way where we can handle this situation..i.e., nova-compute should not start eventhough our feature tries to start
06:45:56	Zoya	Please help me out..
06:46:02	Zoya	Thanks in advance..
07:03:21	Zoya	Hello everyone..In my deployment at one stage nova-compute is being enabled..i.e., one feature is starting nova-compute I need to stop this...But I can't touch the feature which is starting nova-compute..Is there any way to handle this situation..i.e., nova-compute should not start eventhough our feature tries to start Please help me out.. Thanks in advance..
07:06:00	Sara__	Hi
07:24:57	gmann	alex_xu: updated this one - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516104/3
07:25:51	alex_xu	gmann: thanks
07:55:03	openstackgerrit	Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Fix foreign key constraint error https://review.openstack.org/516880
08:40:54	openstackgerrit	Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: get vGPU stats from hypervisor https://review.openstack.org/512965
08:54:09	openstackgerrit	Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: provide vGPU inventory in compute node https://review.openstack.org/516217
09:04:27	openstackgerrit	Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP]Add pagination and Changes-since filter support for os-migrations. https://review.openstack.org/330406
09:17:16	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Remove direct usage of glance.generate_image_url https://review.openstack.org/511397
09:17:16	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove glance usage inside compute https://review.openstack.org/511392
09:28:22	openstackgerrit	Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: XenAPI: create vGPU for instance https://review.openstack.org/516899
09:37:50	openstackgerrit	Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Mention API behavior change when over quota limit https://review.openstack.org/515631
09:53:02	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/511035
10:56:31	Zoya	Hello everyone..In my deployment at one stage nova-compute is being enabled..i.e., one feature is starting nova-compute I need to stop this...But I can't touch the feature which is starting nova-compute..Is there any way to handle this situation..i.e., nova-compute should not start eventhough our feature tries to start Please help me out.. Thanks in advance..
10:57:26	openstackgerrit	Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for symmetric GET and PUT of allocations https://review.openstack.org/508164
10:59:08	cdent	efried, jaypipes: as I’m not going to be around to do the adjustments to GET /allocation_candidates notes in that ^ spec update for about two weeks, either of you are welcome to adopt the stack at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512420/
11:28:44	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/511035
12:19:13	efried	cdent ack
12:20:41	jaypipes	cdent: ack
12:22:41	efried	cdent That one doesn't appear to be part of a series - did you mean the spec and this change https://review.openstack.org/510626 ?
12:22:51	jaypipes	alex_xu: good evening sir
12:25:42	openstackgerrit	OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/511035
12:31:44	efried	cdent Disregard, not sure wtf I was looking at.
12:37:30	tomsou_	hi all, I am looking into a failing apex deployment. It fails during "openstack undercloud install". The specific command is "/bin/nova-manage cell_v2 list_cells --verbose" and the error "No sql_connection parameter is established". Does anyone have any idea on this?
12:37:48	tomsou_	mariadb is running
12:46:01	moshele	stephenfin, jaypipes: hi can you review this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505613/ is to solve a bug for the ovs hw offload which I introduce in pike :)
12:47:06	jaypipes	moshele: well, holy crap! welcome back, my friend! :P
12:47:18	alex_xu	nova api meeting is in 13 mins at #openstack-meeting-4
12:47:20	alex_xu	jaypipes: good morning sir
12:47:40	cdent	efried, jaypipes: ack ack
12:47:58	jaypipes	alex_xu: good mornin. :) I'm going to push an additional WIP/demo patch at the end of that refactoring _get_by_filters() series to show you my thoughts on traits/nested stuff.
12:48:21	moshele	jaypipes: I was on 3 week vacation because of birth of my first baby girl :)
12:48:27	jaypipes	alex_xu: if anything, I'm happy the series has been able to get the discussion going on this and maybe throw some different ideas around.
12:48:42	efried	Congratulations moshele !
12:48:43	jaypipes	moshele: congrats, my friend! that's awesome news! :)
12:48:47	alex_xu	jaypipes: ok, cool
12:49:03	moshele	jaypipes, efried: thanks :)
12:49:05	alex_xu	moshele: congratulations!
12:49:07	jaypipes	moshele: you and alex_xu can share those lovely late nights rocking the cradle :)
12:49:22	jaypipes	moshele: alex_xu also has a little one :)
12:49:45	moshele	jaypipes: indeed :) alex_xu: congrats :)
12:50:13	alex_xu	moshele: yea, if you can't sleep, you can log on the irc, and discussion tech stuff with asia guys
12:51:49	moshele	alex_xu: :)
12:52:12	efried	jaypipes About this common RequestGroup class definition:
12:52:49	efried	jaypipes I get that it appears like code duplication; but realistically, it's not all that uncommon for either side of an API boundary to have very similar or identical objects.
12:53:10	efried	In the rest of the nova API we just share the nova.objects or .models stuff on either side.
12:54:09	efried	And in fact, if any of the JSON payloads we've been sending back and forth over placement had ever been object-ified, we would have already run into this.
12:54:35	efried	Or put the other way: if I had made RequestGroup just a dict, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
12:55:32	efried	All this to express my opinion, that it's not at all inappropriate for either side of an API to have substantially identical object representations for the same thing.
12:55:34	jaypipes	efried: ack.
12:55:55	efried	I suppose if we had os-placement, it could expose the RequestGroup class in a lib and nova could import it.
12:56:15	efried	and perhaps it's time to start designing package structure with that in mind.

Earlier   Later