Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-29
15:55:35 fried_rice in neutron.conf ?
15:55:39 leakypipes device_id == hostname, right?
15:55:42 leakypipes sean-k-mooney: ^\
15:55:59 sean-k-mooney device_id?
15:56:41 leakypipes sean-k-mooney: in neutron port response...
15:57:35 leakypipes sean-k-mooney: never mind.
15:57:36 sean-k-mooney oh binding:host_id is
15:57:40 mriedem superdan: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/60
15:57:45 mriedem melwitt: tssurya: ^
15:59:06 superdan mriedem: hmm, did the gate just get dumped?
15:59:16 mriedem idk
15:59:18 sean-k-mooney binding:host_id is set by nova when the port is bound by the compute node
15:59:54 sean-k-mooney leakypipes: but thanks that answers my question ill let rodolfo know
16:00:06 sean-k-mooney and thank fried_rice too
16:00:07 melwitt I thought I saw something in #openstack-infra that said they were gonna stop zuul v3
16:00:08 superdan s'empty
16:00:27 melwitt but I wasn't sure if I read it right
16:00:35 fried_rice I just got a weird merge conflict
16:00:45 superdan well, I had to fix the unit test patch anyway, so I'll push up some fresh in a minute
16:02:54 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move cell0 marker test to Cellsv1DeprecatedTestMixIn https://review.openstack.org/508314
16:02:55 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix CellDatabases fixture swallowing exceptions https://review.openstack.org/506312
16:02:55 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Use improved instance_list module in compute API https://review.openstack.org/505418
16:02:56 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix minor input items from previous patches https://review.openstack.org/506416
16:03:38 superdan mriedem: did you want me to do something with those session proposals or just headupping me?
16:03:45 mriedem just fyi
16:03:50 superdan ack
16:05:57 melwitt mriedem: are you going to propose an install/upgrade one or shall I? you didn't mention one in your ML post but I wanted to double check
16:09:41 mriedem melwitt: i wasn't planning on proposing a specific nova upgrades one no, i figured some of that will be covered in cells/placement sessions on what happened in pike and the focus for queens
16:09:46 mriedem feel free though
16:10:07 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Re-use existing ComputeNode on ironic rebalance https://review.openstack.org/508555
16:10:10 superdan so,
16:10:33 superdan since we don't get to prioritize these (right?) I'd hate to lose one of these important sessions for an upgrade one that we've hit many times before
16:10:40 superdan if we have space, it's always good to have one of those,
16:10:51 superdan but if the TC is picking, I don't want them to choose that over, say, the cells or placement one
16:11:03 superdan could we maybe indicate a preferred ordering somehow? comments?
16:11:13 mriedem comments are about all you get
16:11:26 mriedem NOVA PRIORITY: 5
16:11:32 johnthetubaguy did you make the placement one sound cross project-ey?
16:11:50 johnthetubaguy that might be a good way to keep a good session
16:11:54 mriedem i didn't propose a placement one because of http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/50
16:12:23 mriedem ^ is both generic and too specific
16:12:47 mriedem what i think that is, is talking about how nested resource providers and custom resource classes will let you do all kinds of external scheduling things
16:12:49 johnthetubaguy yeah, it is.
16:12:55 mriedem which is not what i was going to propose
16:13:09 mriedem i guess i'll just propose my own
16:13:12 johnthetubaguy I would tempted to add a good one, and note its a duplicate?
16:13:16 melwitt okay. my thinking was if ppl are recently having trouble installing or upgrading nova, that was important and I wanted to gather action items on whether we need to improve docs, relnotes, nova-manage commands, etc
16:14:37 mriedem melwitt: bauwser has one for docs and relnotes specifically
16:14:52 mriedem i see your point
16:15:15 mriedem are people recently having trouble beyond ocata?
16:15:21 mriedem i know ocata was tough for some people
16:15:54 melwitt yeah, I saw that. docs and relnotes generic session without a target like install/upgrade I'm not sure what will come out of that
16:16:37 mriedem "the release notes don't have enough information!"
16:16:44 mriedem "the release notes have too much information"
16:16:48 mriedem that's what will come out of that
16:16:56 superdan yep
16:17:25 superdan and what will come of the upgrade one is much of the same we've heard before I think, which is why I care less about it than the other things
16:17:35 superdan if we have space for it, then I'm certainly happy to have it
16:17:35 melwitt but I understand everyone's point. I really wish I knew if operators were suffering on newton/ocata/pike and what we could do to ease that. I don't remember discussing that span of releases in a session but I do remember a lot of ppl coming into our channel with issues
16:18:39 melwitt we responded to the issues and improved our docs and nova-manage commands. and now it's our best assumption that everything is okay but I wasn't sure if it is since we haven't had anyone tell us. it's more like lack of complaint
16:19:14 melwitt just thinking aloud mostly
16:20:18 melwitt how can we tell if we have space for more proposals? we can't right?
16:20:33 mriedem melwitt: we can't
16:21:04 mriedem there is a fast forward upgrades session
16:21:14 mriedem so my guess would be a nova-specific upgrade session would be asking for FF upgrades
16:21:36 mriedem ttx: how many slots are there for forum topics?
16:21:51 mriedem s/topics/sessions/
16:22:54 mriedem i would also love feedback on where we've sucked it up perf-wise,
16:22:58 mriedem but,
16:23:00 mriedem ...
16:23:48 melwitt yeah. this is weird that we can't control what we have sessions about and have to worry that some sessions would bump others out
16:24:27 mriedem and as a result we don't propose as many
16:24:37 mriedem meanwhile there are like 4+ overlapping sessions about HPC and NFV
16:25:37 itlinux hello all.. I have a docker image that I installed the clients on and I have the endpoints running on HTTPS.. when I do nova list on that box I get an error.. if I use my virtualbox with openstack installed I can query my remote openstack with the nova list just fine.. any tips?
16:25:42 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix minor input items from previous patches https://review.openstack.org/506416
16:25:49 superdan mriedem: so, in my fixing of your fields thing in ^
16:26:06 superdan I found another place we were implicitly querying for a ton of extra stuff when all we want was metadata
16:26:32 johnthetubaguy fried_rice: leakypipes: superdan: thanks for your help with the ironic placement bug, fix up for review, not had chance to test it yet, something for next week: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508555
16:26:35 superdan "ton" being "four" instead of "one"
16:26:36 superdan you know, apply my normal exaggeration descaling filter
16:28:12 superdan johnthetubaguy: cool
16:29:33 ttx mriedem: not sure, maybe thingee or flaper87 know
16:30:50 mriedem johnthetubaguy: superdan: leakypipes: cdent: figleaf: fyi http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/60
16:31:33 superdan mriedem: you posted that on the cells one, did you mean to do it on a placement one?
16:31:53 leakypipes ack, will do johnthetubaguy
16:32:06 mriedem superdan: you mean this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506416/13/nova/compute/api.py@3755
16:32:16 mriedem crap yes
16:32:20 superdan mriedem: yes that
16:33:03 mriedem superdan: have you seen https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508299/
16:33:10 superdan mriedem: there's a test that failed if we don't pass something to that now that we're doing the fields calculation early, but it means we stop taking the obvious default
16:33:33 superdan mriedem: heh, okay, well, I need it for the change in that patch
16:33:39 superdan mriedem: so whichever one wins the race I guess
16:34:39 mriedem there is an issue with yours
16:34:56 mriedem maybe we should slide https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508299/ in underneath?
16:36:01 superdan ah, I didn't see that it called that
16:36:25 superdan let's just try to get yours in so I don't have to intertwine those two series
16:36:44 superdan still no jenkins run on that one.. is it worth rechecking now or no?
16:37:10 mriedem no idea
16:37:14 mriedem i don't see it queued up
16:37:20 mriedem i'm going to lunch

Earlier   Later