| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-09-29 | |||
| 15:43:21 | bauwser | that's where the API is | |
| 15:43:46 | bauwser | actually a good call for trying to fit the fried_rice's model with vGPUs | |
| 15:44:19 | sean-k-mooney | bauwser: perhaps yes or as image metadata where i say i can support x,y,z and the and flavor say i want y and we compare to make sure its compatible | |
| 15:45:10 | bauwser | sean-k-mooney: mmm | |
| 15:45:26 | bauwser | sean-k-mooney: I wonder if that wouldn't be just a filter for the image metadata | |
| 15:45:47 | bauwser | like, I can find all the hosts that can support y (if y is asked by the flavor) | |
| 15:45:48 | sean-k-mooney | im thinking we can add traits to the image metadata | |
| 15:45:52 | bauwser | that is a placement thing | |
| 15:46:14 | bauwser | well | |
| 15:46:25 | bauwser | honestly that's a thought | |
| 15:47:22 | mordred | fried_rice: looks good on quick glance - but I haven't ooked deeply yet | |
| 15:47:37 | fried_rice | mordred Cool, thanks. | |
| 15:48:22 | bauwser | well, I need to call it a day, actually | |
| 15:48:48 | mriedem | fried_rice: let's let mordred deal with the infra fire that's raging | |
| 15:48:52 | mriedem | :) | |
| 15:49:19 | fried_rice | mriedem mordred Sorry, didn't smell the smoke. | |
| 15:49:27 | mriedem | #openstack-infra | |
| 15:49:42 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: am qq. is there a way we can retrive the compute node resocue provide by the hostid? and if not would you be against adding one. it could just be a trait | |
| 15:50:33 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: each resource provider has a name attribute. | |
| 15:50:41 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: that is set to hypervisor_hostname value | |
| 15:50:49 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: so yeah, you can already do that. | |
| 15:50:55 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: and that name is unique BTW | |
| 15:51:24 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: yes i know we require that all hostnames be unique in the openstack cloud | |
| 15:51:47 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: the issue is the get resouce provider api to day i think need you to pass the uuid | |
| 15:51:50 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: you can find the compute node by hostname, and from the compute node uuid look up the RP | |
| 15:51:53 | mriedem | that's what our functional tests do | |
| 15:51:58 | sean-k-mooney | i dont know if we have a rest api call to get it by name | |
| 15:52:06 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: no, I mean when resource providers are added by the compute node, the resource provider's name attribute is set to the hypervisor_hostname | |
| 15:52:32 | sean-k-mooney | fried_rice: cool if GET /resource_providers?name={hostname} works that perferct | |
| 15:52:34 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: GET /resource_providers?name=$hypervisor_hostname | |
| 15:52:43 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: sorry, yeah, fried_rice beat me to it. | |
| 15:52:59 | leakypipes | he's a wily coyote, that fried_rice | |
| 15:52:59 | fried_rice | Yeah, to be technically correct, in case $hypervisor_hostname isn't the same as `hostname` | |
| 15:53:16 | leakypipes | fried_rice: which is the case for Ironic nodes :) | |
| 15:53:27 | fried_rice | right | |
| 15:53:39 | sean-k-mooney | the reason i was asking is for the neutron placement work. when nested provider are added we will need to find the computenode provider for the current host hence question | |
| 15:54:17 | fried_rice | So as long as you know how virt is reporting the hypervisor hostname, you're golden. | |
| 15:54:54 | sean-k-mooney | in neutron i belive we have the host id in a config that must be set to match the one used by nova | |
| 15:55:23 | leakypipes | right | |
| 15:55:32 | fried_rice | #host = example.domain | |
| 15:55:32 | fried_rice | # the same host value. (unknown value) | |
| 15:55:32 | fried_rice | # this machine. All the agents and services running on this machine must use | |
| 15:55:32 | fried_rice | # Hostname to be used by the Neutron server, agents and services running on | |
| 15:55:35 | fried_rice | in neutron.conf ? | |
| 15:55:39 | leakypipes | device_id == hostname, right? | |
| 15:55:42 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: ^\ | |
| 15:55:59 | sean-k-mooney | device_id? | |
| 15:56:41 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: in neutron port response... | |
| 15:57:35 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: never mind. | |
| 15:57:36 | sean-k-mooney | oh binding:host_id is | |
| 15:57:40 | mriedem | superdan: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/60 | |
| 15:57:45 | mriedem | melwitt: tssurya: ^ | |
| 15:59:06 | superdan | mriedem: hmm, did the gate just get dumped? | |
| 15:59:16 | mriedem | idk | |
| 15:59:18 | sean-k-mooney | binding:host_id is set by nova when the port is bound by the compute node | |
| 15:59:54 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: but thanks that answers my question ill let rodolfo know | |
| 16:00:06 | sean-k-mooney | and thank fried_rice too | |
| 16:00:07 | melwitt | I thought I saw something in #openstack-infra that said they were gonna stop zuul v3 | |
| 16:00:08 | superdan | s'empty | |
| 16:00:27 | melwitt | but I wasn't sure if I read it right | |
| 16:00:35 | fried_rice | I just got a weird merge conflict | |
| 16:00:45 | superdan | well, I had to fix the unit test patch anyway, so I'll push up some fresh in a minute | |
| 16:02:54 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move cell0 marker test to Cellsv1DeprecatedTestMixIn https://review.openstack.org/508314 | |
| 16:02:55 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix CellDatabases fixture swallowing exceptions https://review.openstack.org/506312 | |
| 16:02:55 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Use improved instance_list module in compute API https://review.openstack.org/505418 | |
| 16:02:56 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix minor input items from previous patches https://review.openstack.org/506416 | |
| 16:03:38 | superdan | mriedem: did you want me to do something with those session proposals or just headupping me? | |
| 16:03:45 | mriedem | just fyi | |
| 16:03:50 | superdan | ack | |
| 16:05:57 | melwitt | mriedem: are you going to propose an install/upgrade one or shall I? you didn't mention one in your ML post but I wanted to double check | |
| 16:09:41 | mriedem | melwitt: i wasn't planning on proposing a specific nova upgrades one no, i figured some of that will be covered in cells/placement sessions on what happened in pike and the focus for queens | |
| 16:09:46 | mriedem | feel free though | |
| 16:10:07 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Re-use existing ComputeNode on ironic rebalance https://review.openstack.org/508555 | |
| 16:10:10 | superdan | so, | |
| 16:10:33 | superdan | since we don't get to prioritize these (right?) I'd hate to lose one of these important sessions for an upgrade one that we've hit many times before | |
| 16:10:40 | superdan | if we have space, it's always good to have one of those, | |
| 16:10:51 | superdan | but if the TC is picking, I don't want them to choose that over, say, the cells or placement one | |
| 16:11:03 | superdan | could we maybe indicate a preferred ordering somehow? comments? | |
| 16:11:13 | mriedem | comments are about all you get | |
| 16:11:26 | mriedem | NOVA PRIORITY: 5 | |
| 16:11:32 | johnthetubaguy | did you make the placement one sound cross project-ey? | |
| 16:11:50 | johnthetubaguy | that might be a good way to keep a good session | |
| 16:11:54 | mriedem | i didn't propose a placement one because of http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/50 | |
| 16:12:23 | mriedem | ^ is both generic and too specific | |
| 16:12:47 | mriedem | what i think that is, is talking about how nested resource providers and custom resource classes will let you do all kinds of external scheduling things | |
| 16:12:49 | johnthetubaguy | yeah, it is. | |
| 16:12:55 | mriedem | which is not what i was going to propose | |
| 16:13:09 | mriedem | i guess i'll just propose my own | |
| 16:13:12 | johnthetubaguy | I would tempted to add a good one, and note its a duplicate? | |
| 16:13:16 | melwitt | okay. my thinking was if ppl are recently having trouble installing or upgrading nova, that was important and I wanted to gather action items on whether we need to improve docs, relnotes, nova-manage commands, etc | |
| 16:14:37 | mriedem | melwitt: bauwser has one for docs and relnotes specifically | |
| 16:14:52 | mriedem | i see your point | |
| 16:15:15 | mriedem | are people recently having trouble beyond ocata? | |
| 16:15:21 | mriedem | i know ocata was tough for some people | |
| 16:15:54 | melwitt | yeah, I saw that. docs and relnotes generic session without a target like install/upgrade I'm not sure what will come out of that | |
| 16:16:37 | mriedem | "the release notes don't have enough information!" | |
| 16:16:44 | mriedem | "the release notes have too much information" | |
| 16:16:48 | mriedem | that's what will come out of that | |
| 16:16:56 | superdan | yep | |
| 16:17:25 | superdan | and what will come of the upgrade one is much of the same we've heard before I think, which is why I care less about it than the other things | |