| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-09-06 | |||
| 16:37:00 | mnaser | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/a6c429bd7916211aa04d96caa54443ad92cb99ff/nova/conductor/manager.py#L992-L1006 | |
| 16:37:03 | mnaser | no bury in there | |
| 16:37:10 | mnaser | unlike the other failure cases | |
| 16:37:44 | mnaser | i guess i can work around it now by setting quota/recheck_quota=false for now.. but i think that's the failure case | |
| 16:47:26 | dansmith | mnaser: that's not the bug | |
| 16:47:40 | dansmith | mnaser: at that point we've created it in the one cell, so we can no longer bury it in cell0 | |
| 16:47:54 | dansmith | mnaser: so the bug is that we need to finish updating the mapping in that case, but apparently we aren't | |
| 16:47:59 | dansmith | mnaser: this is pike or ocata? | |
| 16:48:02 | mnaser | pike | |
| 16:48:33 | mnaser | this use case would launch like 30 instances at once | |
| 16:48:34 | dansmith | okay | |
| 16:48:41 | mnaser | s/user use case/ | |
| 16:48:56 | mnaser | and i guess it goes over quota in that big burst | |
| 16:49:09 | dansmith | mnaser: L1042 is the problem | |
| 16:49:24 | dansmith | meaning, we never run L1042, but we should | |
| 16:49:27 | dansmith | in that quota casw | |
| 16:49:39 | mnaser | so technically we should be saving before checking the quota again | |
| 16:49:55 | manasm | mriedem: did you get a chance to look at my comment regarding commit 1b2f3c7bb25667527e7e1d2afd84d5d5533e7751 earlier today? | |
| 16:50:04 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Put base policy rules at first https://review.openstack.org/500736 | |
| 16:50:21 | mnaser | if folks are busy i dont mind picking up the work cause its a bit critical for us | |
| 16:50:28 | mnaser | just need a little pointing to what has to be done | |
| 16:51:56 | dansmith | mnaser: sure, I'll help guide when you're back to work on it. thanks for excellent triage | |
| 16:52:00 | manasm | the evacuated instance cleanup is failing in delete_allocation_for_evacuated_instance complaining that the compute node key is not present in resource_tracker compute_nodes. It looks like we need to ensure that resources have initialized (via _update_available_resource) before this is called? | |
| 16:53:12 | mriedem | mnaser: did you report a bug yet? | |
| 16:53:58 | mriedem | manasm: i didn't that no, but i think gibi has a related bug open | |
| 16:54:05 | mriedem | about a PUT /allocations with an empty body/ | |
| 16:54:06 | mriedem | ? | |
| 16:56:18 | manasm | mriedem: gibi: can you please help me with defect number so that I can confirm if its the same? | |
| 16:59:37 | mriedem | manasm: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1714924 ? | |
| 16:59:38 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1714924 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "placement api fails when nova tries to delete resource allocation after failed evacuation" [Medium,Confirmed] | |
| 17:03:51 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move lvm handling to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495516 | |
| 17:03:51 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move nbd commands to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/500351 | |
| 17:03:53 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move shred to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495537 | |
| 17:03:53 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move xend existence probes to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495538 | |
| 17:03:54 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup mount / umount and associated rmdir calls https://review.openstack.org/494423 | |
| 17:03:55 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: WIP / Aspirational: we don't need rootwrap any more. https://review.openstack.org/495542 | |
| 17:03:56 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move loopback setup and removal to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495664 | |
| 17:04:00 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirt usages of chown to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/471972 | |
| 17:04:02 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Don't shell out to mkdir, use ensure_tree() https://review.openstack.org/492326 | |
| 17:04:03 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move the idmapshift binary into privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495541 | |
| 17:04:04 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move ploop commands to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/492325 | |
| 17:04:07 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Read from console ptys using privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489486 | |
| 17:04:08 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move kpartx calls to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/500354 | |
| 17:04:13 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid chowning console logs in libvirt https://review.openstack.org/472229 | |
| 17:04:19 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: First attempt at adding a privsep user to nova itself. https://review.openstack.org/459166 | |
| 17:04:22 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of touch to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489190 | |
| 17:04:23 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirts dmcrypt support to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/490737 | |
| 17:04:35 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move blkid calls to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/500398 | |
| 17:04:40 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of tee to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489438 | |
| 17:05:14 | sdague | oh, a wild mikal | |
| 17:05:21 | mikal | sdague: I _think_ I've addressed your concerns on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459166/33, but your comments are welcome as always | |
| 17:07:34 | mikal | sdague: I know I've broken things later in the series with your requested changes, but I am going through and fixing those up now (it will take a while because of test runs) | |
| 17:08:31 | dansmith | sdague: what percentage of the remaining gate resources would you say mikal's set above consumes? :) | |
| 17:09:08 | sdague | dansmith: meh, I think we've been pegged all day already anyway | |
| 17:09:19 | sdague | mikal: the patch above that has an easy fix | |
| 17:09:26 | sdague | which is just delete the uml section | |
| 17:09:28 | dansmith | heh | |
| 17:10:54 | sdague | stephenfin: you deleted uml support at some point, right? | |
| 17:12:31 | sdague | dansmith: well it looks like zuul went super grumpy anyway and just merge conflicted the whole stack on itself | |
| 17:12:37 | sdague | so no tests being run | |
| 17:12:43 | dansmith | karma is a bitch | |
| 17:13:06 | kmalloc | sdague: I want to talk with you re some limit stuff being stored in keystone before the PTG session if you'll have a moment or two | |
| 17:14:10 | kmalloc | I want to make sure I'm not way off in the weeds. we can meet somewhere around the room(s), but just want to make sure i'm not thinking about this side-angled. | |
| 17:14:44 | sdague | kmalloc: sure, though I think the bigger question is finding someone else to drive the limits/quota work, because I definitely don't have the bw on it any more. | |
| 17:14:53 | sdague | but, yet, I'm happy to chat up current thinking | |
| 17:15:00 | kmalloc | right. i expect someone will have to help drive it | |
| 17:15:18 | kmalloc | but i know you and I spent a chunk of time going over the details and requirements :) | |
| 17:15:25 | kmalloc | i also don't have the bw to drive it | |
| 17:15:28 | kmalloc | =/ | |
| 17:16:34 | sdague | yeh, I would be more inclined to spend time figuring out if there is someone that wants to own it, and then supporting them. I don't think it makes a ton of sense to work on details until that is figured out | |
| 17:17:32 | manasm | mriedem: thanks for bug link, will check and revert. | |
| 17:20:43 | openstackgerrit | Erik Berg proposed openstack/nova master: Fix binary name. https://review.openstack.org/501359 | |
| 17:22:35 | mikal | dansmith: hey, perhaps these could have been reviewed five months ago when they were written then? | |
| 17:23:06 | dansmith | mikal: no I'm pretty sure nobody can look at them until they're more than three months old. isn't that a rule or something? | |
| 17:23:46 | dansmith | mikal: I'm poking fun at the sad state of the gate, not your set of course :) | |
| 17:26:24 | mikal | dansmith: possibly... my plan is to keep growing the series and hold the gate to ransom until you give into my demands. | |
| 17:26:40 | dansmith | mikal: seems like a solid strategy to me | |
| 17:26:46 | mikal | dansmith: I know, but I am hoping to emotionally pressure you into rubber stamping my thing | |
| 17:26:54 | mikal | Also, UML WTF? | |
| 17:26:54 | dansmith | hah | |
| 17:27:17 | mikal | Also, said thing caused cburgess a heart attack, so clearly its ready for prime time | |
| 17:28:11 | dansmith | I run a for-profit public cloud on UML | |
| 17:28:15 | dansmith | still waiting for customers though | |
| 17:28:27 | sdague | mikal: I had thought that stephenfin had actually removed that, but maybe not | |
| 17:28:43 | mikal | sdague: or this is a dangling bit? | |
| 17:28:52 | sdague | I went through git log -S on it, it looks like it was put in place in the before times, for CI testing | |
| 17:29:00 | mikal | sdague: I found some dead code in libvirt.vif as well on this little journey | |
| 17:29:23 | sdague | I think that uml references are fair to just delete | |
| 17:29:48 | sdague | I guess we should probably get final sign off from fearless leader on that, maybe I'll push up a blanket patch for it | |
| 17:30:19 | dansmith | I'll bet you a dollar that dear leader thinks UML is a diagram technique | |
| 17:30:26 | sdague | heh | |
| 17:30:32 | sdague | yeh, I did have to explain it to folks | |
| 17:30:42 | mikal | We should deprecate it | |
| 17:30:47 | mikal | Because that's always fun | |
| 17:33:41 | jaypipes | dims: currently the hurricane is projected to hit Miami on Sunday midday | |
| 17:34:00 | jaypipes | dims: but that means Sarasota will be no-fly and my flight leaves Sunday morning. | |
| 17:37:06 | dims | jaypipes : too close ... :( any evac orders? | |
| 17:40:21 | jaypipes | dims: not in sarasota, only the keys | |
| 17:42:06 | dansmith | the keys.. aka "the small sand bars formerly known as the keys" | |
| 17:42:28 | jaypipes | dansmith: right. | |