Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-01
01:51:00	dansmith	the destination host
01:51:06	mriedem	we could rename to target or dest or whatever
01:51:13	dansmith	yep
01:51:45	jaypipes	I gotta look at this in the morning. I'm fried right now :(
01:52:06	dansmith	jaypipes: you want me to convert it to source/dest so it's like that for you in the morning?
01:52:19	jaypipes	dansmith: no.
01:52:35	jaypipes	dansmith: I'll do it in the morning. will probably need to start from scratch with this last patch :(
01:52:44	dansmith	okay
01:52:46	jaypipes	too many friggin conditionals to keep in my head.
01:53:11	jaypipes	are we in the update loop? are we on an ocata? are we removing? are we migrating to same host?
01:53:20	jaypipes	all with the same fucking code paths. :(
01:53:28	dansmith	well, this is why in hindsight, I think bolting this onto the RT was a bad move
01:53:33	dansmith	too much baggage
01:54:32	dansmith	jaypipes: anyway, go get your pug cuddles
02:00:01	jaypipes	dansmith: I would have been happy to write all of this outside of the resource tracker, but you know... upgrades.
02:00:52	openstackgerrit	Spencer Yu proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Nova client should retry with Retry-After value https://review.openstack.org/447766
03:00:23	openstackgerrit	Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Live migration failed in xapi pool https://review.openstack.org/489451
04:53:57	openstackgerrit	Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix test_get_volume_config method https://review.openstack.org/489467
06:04:53	openstackgerrit	Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
06:10:22	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid chowning console logs in libvirt https://review.openstack.org/472229
06:10:23	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of touch to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489190
06:10:23	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: First attempt at adding a privsep user to nova itself. https://review.openstack.org/459166
06:10:24	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirt usages of chown to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/471972
06:10:24	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of tee to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489438
06:10:25	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Read from console ptys using privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489486
06:10:25	openstackgerrit	Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: rootwrap.d cleanup mislabeled files https://review.openstack.org/486831
06:14:35	openstackgerrit	Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
06:17:28	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move common definition into common.py https://review.openstack.org/489491
06:17:29	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
06:53:35	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
07:13:43	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: allow null to be input for key_name https://review.openstack.org/489505
07:22:48	openstack	Launchpad bug 1707256 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Scheduler report client does not account for shared resource providers" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Jay Pipes (jaypipes)
07:22:48	bhagyashris	jaypipes: Hi, Found one bug reported on launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1707256 so is this will solve the issue that we have discussed yesterday.
07:53:57	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: enhance error message for input field https://review.openstack.org/489519
08:03:47	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:enhance error message for input field https://review.openstack.org/489519
08:18:42	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: add description about key_name https://review.openstack.org/489525
08:26:57	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move common definition into common.py https://review.openstack.org/489491
08:26:58	openstackgerrit	jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
08:32:23	mamandle	bauzas: sfinucan: mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483911/ is awaiting another +2, can you please take a look, Thanks.
08:39:34	bhagyashris	Hi all I am facing one issue to boot instance in multinode setup. Error ""Host 'host-name' is not mapped to any cell". because of this instance is going to error state Can any one have any idea about this to resolve.
08:40:19	bhagyashris	On controller + compute node the n-cond-cell1 is configure
08:53:13	saphi	bhagyashris Did you discover new compute node? Run `nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts` on controller node
09:03:11	openstackgerrit	Jacek Tomasiak proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: Use internal API endpoint https://review.openstack.org/489537
09:09:57	trinaths	hi, when I installed compute node using devstack ocata, I see that nova-compute is running with nova-cpu.conf. but actually it must run with nova.conf and nova-compute.conf. is there any localrc changes I need to make for this?
09:13:46	openstackgerrit	Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Abort Cold Migration https://review.openstack.org/334732
09:20:31	bhagyashris	saphi: Hi, I have done this too, but still getting same error.
09:23:58	trinaths	I get this error when I run nova-compute, IncompatibleObjectVersion: Version 2.4 of InstanceList is not supported
09:25:01	saphi	Can you post your nova-compute.log?
09:25:12	saphi	bhagyashris
09:28:41	openstackgerrit	Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
09:28:57	openstackgerrit	Alexandru Muresan proposed openstack/nova master: Pass config object to oslo_reports https://review.openstack.org/485575
09:30:30	trinaths	Cannot update service status on host "compute" due to an unexpected exception
09:36:41	bauzas	johnthetubaguy: not sure you're around, but I'm wondering if other drivers but libvirt and vmware can support shrinking root disks when resizing
09:36:55	bauzas	I tend to think so for ironic at least
09:37:10	openstack	Launchpad bug 1707830 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "resize to smaller flavor failed, but has not error message on dashboard" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Zhaokun Fu (fuzhaokun)
09:37:10	bauzas	the context being https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1707830
09:37:19	bauzas	I don't want to make it something verified by the API
09:42:05	trinaths	oslo_messaging.rpc.server IncompatibleObjectVersion: Version 2.4 of InstanceList is not supported
09:49:56	openstackgerrit	Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Accept any scheduler driver entrypoint https://review.openstack.org/484828
09:54:13	cdent	sdague++ on the mass abandonment
09:54:32	openstackgerrit	Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Destroy the ReqSpec object when deleting the instance https://review.openstack.org/391060
09:55:06	sdague	cdent: yeh, the in progress list is a lot less accurate than we think
09:55:27	sdague	I trimmed back the criteria, this is just stuff that's been in merge conflict for 4 weeks
09:56:03	sdague	cdent: what comms channel did you notice this on?
09:56:19	cdent	i’m getting a lot of email for reviews that I’m watching
09:56:25	cdent	or otherwise participating in
09:56:36	cdent	so: from gerrit
09:57:55	sdague	gotcha
10:02:00	openstackgerrit	Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.resize_prep notification https://review.openstack.org/465081
10:18:35	openstackgerrit	Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Test resize with placement api https://review.openstack.org/487958
10:22:20	gibi	cdent: I will push an update to ^^ soon with some refactoring
10:22:42	gibi	cdent: removing duplicated code and better naming variables
10:23:21	cdent	gibi: are you up to date on the plan there? make it pass on current master, with expectations commented out, and then adjust it based on all the code jay’s been working.
10:23:31	openstackgerrit	Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test resize with placement api https://review.openstack.org/487958
10:23:39	gibi	cdent: yes, I read back
10:23:45	cdent	go you
10:24:01	gibi	cdent: what I did is that I update ps 14 on master with some refactoring
10:24:23	gibi	cdent: also locally I moved top of the bugfix to see that confirm works with the uncommented asserts as well
10:24:38	cdent	there was a hangout between dan and jay last night that went on for quite some time, I was only able to particpate for a short while. it was complicated.
10:24:41	bauzas	cdent: I still need to understand the consensus now
10:24:58	cdent	bauzas: as far as I can tell there isn’t yet a consensus on a fix
10:25:06	bauzas	okay
10:25:10	bauzas	let's wait for the others
10:25:19	cdent	we are aware of the problem and want to make it as visible as possible, thus the functional test going in first
10:25:26	gibi	exactly this is why I only did refactoring that does not impact whatwhever will be the fix for the bug
10:27:24	cdent	bauzas: in the conversations last night, each time a potential solution was discussed another problem was revealed
10:27:32	bauzas	heh
10:28:09	cdent	one idea that was well liked was that a migration/resize would have a second allocation with a different consumer id, instead of the doubling
10:28:36	cdent	but that discussion exposed problems with migrations happening between ocata computes and pike computes
10:28:41	bauzas	shouldn't we buy https://www.amazon.com/Hasbro-40509-Whac-A-Mole-Game/dp/B0001GDP00 ?
10:28:48	cdent	probably yes
10:29:05	bauzas	I see
10:29:12	bauzas	about the 2nd consumer discussion
10:29:24	cdent	sdague: and now the launchpad emails are starting
10:29:31	bauzas	honestly, looks like a doubling allocation seems difficult
10:29:54	bauzas	when I provided my comment, I was just thinking of getting the original allocation and just passing it back in case of an exception
10:30:12	bauzas	I didn't thought about all the other problems we could have :(
10:31:05	sdague	cdent: yeh, I'm flushing the in progress bugs, it moves at least 25 out of in progress
10:31:30	bauzas	sdague: I did that too
10:32:24	cdent	bauzas: It’s good that we are talking this stuff out, because we don’t really have sufficient testing to find the bugs that we are creating (we need more gibi ) so applying brains is necessary. Each question, though annoying, is revealing something, and that’s better in the long run.

Earlier   Later