Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-01
01:27:35 dansmith jaypipes: yeah
01:27:45 jaypipes 1136 compute_version = objects.Service.get_minimum_version(
01:27:45 jaypipes dansmith: so this:
01:27:46 jaypipes 1140 heal_allocations = True
01:27:46 jaypipes 1139 if compute_version < 22:
01:27:46 jaypipes 1138 heal_allocations = False
01:27:46 jaypipes 1137 context, 'nova-compute')
01:27:56 jaypipes is not working
01:28:09 jaypipes or at least, it's returning heal_allocations = True in the functional tests
01:28:27 dansmith jaypipes: are you using the allservicescurrent fixture?
01:28:28 jaypipes which is triggering the healing of allocations improperly.
01:28:36 dansmith otherwise you probably have a min ver of zero
01:28:38 jaypipes dansmith: sigh
01:28:47 dansmith jaypipes: mriedem pointed that out earlier
01:28:50 jaypipes you even told me about that earlier.
01:28:54 jaypipes yeah.. :(
01:28:56 dansmith yeah, sorry
01:39:57 mriedem dansmith: ok comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487183/ for the cells docs - looks real purdy
01:40:06 mriedem you can tell me you'll look in the morning and i won't be hurt
01:40:31 dansmith mriedem: I'll look in the morning
01:41:59 dansmith but.. you said...
01:46:21 jaypipes dansmith: other_provider_uuid is the source host right?
01:46:40 dansmith jaypipes: it depends on which direction you're going
01:47:12 dansmith jaypipes: actually, it should always be target the way it's written I think
01:47:25 dansmith provider_uuid is instance[host] and other is the target right/
01:47:26 jaypipes dansmith: ? if "host" is always the one you were originally scheduled to, then other is the one you're going *to*, right?
01:47:57 jaypipes yeah, ok
01:48:33 jaypipes dansmith: the only thing the "other direction" refers to isn't the direction but rather the order in which the hosts' update_available_resource() is called.
01:48:45 jaypipes I think?
01:48:46 dansmith no
01:48:54 dansmith we always call host1 first and host2 second
01:49:00 dansmith for the periodic
01:50:47 mriedem other_provider_uuid is the target
01:50:55 dansmith right
01:51:00 dansmith the destination host
01:51:06 mriedem we could rename to target or dest or whatever
01:51:13 dansmith yep
01:51:45 jaypipes I gotta look at this in the morning. I'm fried right now :(
01:52:06 dansmith jaypipes: you want me to convert it to source/dest so it's like that for you in the morning?
01:52:19 jaypipes dansmith: no.
01:52:35 jaypipes dansmith: I'll do it in the morning. will probably need to start from scratch with this last patch :(
01:52:44 dansmith okay
01:52:46 jaypipes too many friggin conditionals to keep in my head.
01:53:11 jaypipes are we in the update loop? are we on an ocata? are we removing? are we migrating to same host?
01:53:20 jaypipes all with the same fucking code paths. :(
01:53:28 dansmith well, this is why in hindsight, I think bolting this onto the RT was a bad move
01:53:33 dansmith too much baggage
01:54:32 dansmith jaypipes: anyway, go get your pug cuddles
02:00:01 jaypipes dansmith: I would have been happy to write all of this outside of the resource tracker, but you know... upgrades.
02:00:52 openstackgerrit Spencer Yu proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Nova client should retry with Retry-After value https://review.openstack.org/447766
03:00:23 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Live migration failed in xapi pool https://review.openstack.org/489451
04:53:57 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix test_get_volume_config method https://review.openstack.org/489467
06:04:53 openstackgerrit Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
06:10:22 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid chowning console logs in libvirt https://review.openstack.org/472229
06:10:23 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of touch to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489190
06:10:23 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: First attempt at adding a privsep user to nova itself. https://review.openstack.org/459166
06:10:24 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirt usages of chown to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/471972
06:10:24 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of tee to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489438
06:10:25 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Read from console ptys using privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489486
06:10:25 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: rootwrap.d cleanup mislabeled files https://review.openstack.org/486831
06:14:35 openstackgerrit Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
06:17:28 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move common definition into common.py https://review.openstack.org/489491
06:17:29 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
06:53:35 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
07:13:43 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: allow null to be input for key_name https://review.openstack.org/489505
07:22:48 openstack Launchpad bug 1707256 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Scheduler report client does not account for shared resource providers" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Jay Pipes (jaypipes)
07:22:48 bhagyashris jaypipes: Hi, Found one bug reported on launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1707256 so is this will solve the issue that we have discussed yesterday.
07:53:57 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: enhance error message for input field https://review.openstack.org/489519
08:03:47 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:enhance error message for input field https://review.openstack.org/489519
08:18:42 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: add description about key_name https://review.openstack.org/489525
08:26:57 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move common definition into common.py https://review.openstack.org/489491
08:26:58 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:check query param for service's index function https://review.openstack.org/489492
08:32:23 mamandle bauzas: sfinucan: mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483911/ is awaiting another +2, can you please take a look, Thanks.
08:39:34 bhagyashris Hi all I am facing one issue to boot instance in multinode setup. Error ""Host 'host-name' is not mapped to any cell". because of this instance is going to error state Can any one have any idea about this to resolve.
08:40:19 bhagyashris On controller + compute node the n-cond-cell1 is configure
08:53:13 saphi bhagyashris Did you discover new compute node? Run `nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts` on controller node
09:03:11 openstackgerrit Jacek Tomasiak proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: Use internal API endpoint https://review.openstack.org/489537
09:09:57 trinaths hi, when I installed compute node using devstack ocata, I see that nova-compute is running with nova-cpu.conf. but actually it must run with nova.conf and nova-compute.conf. is there any localrc changes I need to make for this?
09:13:46 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Abort Cold Migration https://review.openstack.org/334732
09:20:31 bhagyashris saphi: Hi, I have done this too, but still getting same error.
09:23:58 trinaths I get this error when I run nova-compute, IncompatibleObjectVersion: Version 2.4 of InstanceList is not supported
09:25:01 saphi Can you post your nova-compute.log?
09:25:12 saphi bhagyashris
09:28:41 openstackgerrit Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/nova master: Smaller disk flavor check https://review.openstack.org/489484
09:28:57 openstackgerrit Alexandru Muresan proposed openstack/nova master: Pass config object to oslo_reports https://review.openstack.org/485575
09:30:30 trinaths Cannot update service status on host "compute" due to an unexpected exception
09:36:41 bauzas johnthetubaguy: not sure you're around, but I'm wondering if other drivers but libvirt and vmware can support shrinking root disks when resizing
09:36:55 bauzas I tend to think so for ironic at least
09:37:10 openstack Launchpad bug 1707830 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "resize to smaller flavor failed, but has not error message on dashboard" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Zhaokun Fu (fuzhaokun)
09:37:10 bauzas the context being https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1707830
09:37:19 bauzas I don't want to make it something verified by the API
09:42:05 trinaths oslo_messaging.rpc.server IncompatibleObjectVersion: Version 2.4 of InstanceList is not supported
09:49:56 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Accept any scheduler driver entrypoint https://review.openstack.org/484828
09:54:13 cdent sdague++ on the mass abandonment
09:54:32 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Destroy the ReqSpec object when deleting the instance https://review.openstack.org/391060
09:55:06 sdague cdent: yeh, the in progress list is a lot less accurate than we think
09:55:27 sdague I trimmed back the criteria, this is just stuff that's been in merge conflict for 4 weeks
09:56:03 sdague cdent: what comms channel did you notice this on?
09:56:19 cdent i’m getting a lot of email for reviews that I’m watching
09:56:25 cdent or otherwise participating in

Earlier   Later