| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-31 | |||
| 22:44:22 | mriedem | nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts | |
| 22:44:30 | dfisher | no, it's not mapped. | |
| 22:44:30 | mriedem | --verbose | |
| 22:44:38 | dfisher | how would I map it | |
| 22:44:42 | dfisher | ? | |
| 22:46:01 | mriedem | dfisher: ^ | |
| 22:46:04 | mriedem | discover_hosts | |
| 22:46:29 | dfisher | yeah, that's not finding it :( | |
| 22:46:48 | dfisher | http://paste.openstack.org/show/617066/ | |
| 22:48:25 | dansmith | dfisher: then your compute isn't checking into the cell1 db | |
| 22:48:52 | dansmith | dfisher: make sure your conductor's config is pointed at the cell1 db, matching the cell1 cell_mapping record | |
| 22:49:08 | dfisher | ok. will poke. thanks dansmith! | |
| 22:52:26 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Test resize with placement api https://review.openstack.org/487958 | |
| 22:52:32 | dansmith | mriedem: ^ see if you hate that | |
| 22:52:40 | dansmith | should be repeatable, and keep jaypipes honest :) | |
| 22:57:17 | mriedem | dansmith: questions inline about the az stuff | |
| 22:59:25 | dansmith | mriedem: comments inline | |
| 23:00:51 | mriedem | oh right forced_host | |
| 23:00:58 | mriedem | which there used to be a docs page for that, | |
| 23:01:02 | mriedem | but with the migration it looks like it's gone | |
| 23:01:16 | mriedem | and our api-ref doesn't mention this wrinkle of course | |
| 23:03:19 | dansmith | I admit, I had to copy some deets out of an ask.o.o article :P | |
| 23:03:42 | mriedem | there used to be a nice docs page called "Select hosts where instances are launched" | |
| 23:03:46 | mriedem | and it had this information in it | |
| 23:03:51 | mriedem | but apparently it's been deleted | |
| 23:05:05 | mriedem | alright i'll check results after i get back from maya's gymnastics class, which is full of fun and surprises | |
| 23:06:33 | dansmith | ack | |
| 23:27:04 | mikal | Does anyone here understand what causes hairpins to fail to enable? | |
| 23:27:14 | mikal | I'm trying to unravel that code to be less ... processy | |
| 23:35:18 | jaypipes | mikal: sorry, no :( | |
| 23:36:00 | jaypipes | dansmith: sorry, was dinnering. what change did you make to make that test stable? | |
| 23:36:21 | dansmith | jaypipes: made sure to boot the instance on a specific node consistently | |
| 23:36:33 | dansmith | jaypipes: since the allocations are screwed up by one running the periodic before the other, | |
| 23:36:52 | dansmith | the order of boot, migration, and which node runs the periodic last affect the outcome | |
| 23:37:18 | dansmith | jaypipes: so now it runs each test twice, starting and finishing on a different node each time | |
| 23:37:25 | dansmith | since it always runs the periodic in the same order, | |
| 23:37:38 | dansmith | that will cover us against ordering issues if you pass all four tests | |
| 23:37:51 | dansmith | and mriedem is going to work on a single-node variant I think | |
| 23:43:07 | jaypipes | dansmith: k | |
| 23:43:15 | jaypipes | dansmith: so I'm good to pull and rebase? | |
| 23:44:01 | mikal | jaypipes: its ok, this is all nova-net code and might go to heaven soon anyways | |
| 23:44:14 | jaypipes | mikal: heaven? | |
| 23:44:25 | dansmith | jaypipes: cha | |
| 23:44:41 | mikal | jaypipes: would you prefer "is put out to pasture"? | |
| 23:44:42 | dansmith | jaypipes: remember things are upside down for mikal | |
| 23:44:51 | jaypipes | heh | |
| 23:44:54 | mikal | "kicks the bucket" | |
| 23:44:59 | mikal | "goes for a dirt nap" | |
| 23:46:54 | dansmith | jaypipes: oh looks like there is a pep8 error in that test patch, maybe you can fix when you rebase? | |
| 23:47:02 | jaypipes | dansmith: yuppers. | |
| 23:47:22 | dansmith | jaypipes: and note that two of those tests are self.skipTest()ed so you'll want to unskip them as soon as you can | |
| 23:47:31 | jaypipes | yup, got it. | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-08-01 | |||
| 00:04:29 | jaypipes | dansmith: the reason it's failing is because you're forgetting to run that _run_perioidics() after calling delete on the server. | |
| 00:05:03 | jaypipes | dansmith: on the revert one. | |
| 00:05:32 | dansmith | jaypipes: the reason what is failing? | |
| 00:06:00 | dansmith | tests pass locally for me, and delete should clean up all the allocations without a periodic run, no? | |
| 00:06:20 | jaypipes | nope. | |
| 00:06:32 | dansmith | um why? | |
| 00:06:35 | jaypipes | dansmith: delete doesn't clean up placement at all. | |
| 00:06:46 | dansmith | delete doesn't call self.update() or whatever in compute manager? | |
| 00:06:58 | jaypipes | update is only inventory. | |
| 00:06:58 | dansmith | that would mean you can't boot instances on a compute node until after the periodic runs to clean up | |
| 00:07:53 | jaypipes | dansmith: welcome to my hell. | |
| 00:08:01 | dansmith | no, I'm serious | |
| 00:08:21 | dansmith | that makes zero sense to me.. surely we'd have people beating down our door if deleting an instance didn't free up space for another one | |
| 00:08:44 | dansmith | jaypipes: but again, the tests pass for me, so what are you saying is failing? | |
| 00:09:09 | jaypipes | dansmith: nm, I'm wrong. | |
| 00:09:27 | jaypipes | I think... | |
| 00:09:28 | dansmith | self._update_resource_tracker() is in _complete_deletion() | |
| 00:09:32 | dansmith | surely that updates things | |
| 00:09:44 | jaypipes | only if the uuid is in self.tracked_instances. | |
| 00:09:44 | dansmith | yeah, calls update_usage() | |
| 00:10:35 | dansmith | which it will be if it was just running | |
| 00:41:16 | mriedem | dansmith: jaypipes: did you guys sort out the delete allocations on delete thing? b/c i'm pretty sure melwitt has a functional test up for that. | |
| 00:41:27 | jaypipes | mriedem: yeah, I was wrong. | |
| 00:42:12 | mriedem | oh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470578/ is for local delete | |
| 00:43:11 | mriedem | alright well someone just ping me when the pep8 thing is fixed and i'll +2 | |
| 00:45:51 | jaypipes | mriedem: I'm working on it. | |
| 00:48:27 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of tee to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489438 | |
| 00:53:08 | mikal | melwitt / sdague: the +W fell off https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486831 if you're feeling charitable | |
| 00:53:22 | mikal | It would make tonyb's day | |
| 00:53:53 | tonyb | it would at that | |
| 00:54:48 | mriedem | there was no +W on that | |
| 00:55:01 | mriedem | nice try aussies | |
| 00:55:06 | jaypipes | dansmith: why are we setting the availability zone on the build request in these tests? | |
| 00:55:15 | mriedem | jaypipes: to force the host | |
| 00:55:17 | mriedem | at boot time | |
| 00:55:34 | jaypipes | ugh | |
| 00:55:35 | mriedem | it uses the forced_host thing in the api | |
| 00:55:36 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 00:55:41 | mikal | mriedem: curse you meddling kids | |
| 00:55:43 | mriedem | but it makes the order deterministic | |
| 00:56:12 | mriedem | jaypipes: plus we lost all the docs on that forced_host thing with the docs migration i think | |
| 00:58:01 | tonyb | ZOMG I was lied to! | |
| 00:58:44 | mriedem | https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals/commit/c21f7bb13ccec63ecf96f5d9d0a9d30f1057e4d5#diff-320133d1ccbd2ba417cd580760c18606 | |
| 00:59:10 | mriedem | stephenfin: ^ do we have plans to import that into the nova docs? | |
| 00:59:19 | mriedem | because this forced_host thing isn't in the compute API reference | |
| 01:00:51 | jaypipes | really wish we used the names source and destination instead of "host" and "other" | |
| 01:01:09 | mikal | jaypipes: that's defeatist | |
| 01:01:24 | mikal | jaypipes: next you'll be complaining that we convey "hairpin enable failed" with a ProcessException | |