| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-28 | |||
| 04:08:30 | mriedem | you're also watching over telnet? | |
| 04:08:47 | dansmith | off and on to make sure it's not stuck | |
| 04:08:55 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: placement: account for move operations in claim https://review.openstack.org/487589 | |
| 04:09:49 | dansmith | hmm, I pulled and got the commit but no merge commit yet | |
| 04:10:02 | dansmith | for the first one | |
| 04:11:19 | mriedem | much like the line for the carousel tonight, you must have patience | |
| 04:11:27 | dansmith | heh | |
| 04:11:30 | mriedem | and a high tolerance for carney folk | |
| 04:12:33 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: claim resources in placement API during schedule() https://review.openstack.org/483566 | |
| 04:13:08 | mriedem | duh duh duh | |
| 04:13:15 | dansmith | got that one but still no merge commits | |
| 04:13:45 | mriedem | don't we just need 23c4eb34380bdf3eece11abbe0f6ccb68c060f47 ? | |
| 04:14:02 | dansmith | you list the merge commit in the release thing right? | |
| 04:14:06 | dansmith | not the actual commit | |
| 04:14:13 | mriedem | no, | |
| 04:14:15 | mriedem | tip of master | |
| 04:14:17 | dansmith | your WIP patch is a merge commit | |
| 04:14:26 | mriedem | that was just tip of master at the time | |
| 04:14:27 | dansmith | erm, okay | |
| 04:14:49 | dansmith | so maybe zuul does a ff merge if it's clean or something? I thought it always did merge commits | |
| 04:15:24 | mriedem | you want to update the release patch since you've watched this all night? | |
| 04:15:30 | dansmith | just did | |
| 04:15:50 | mriedem | well touche | |
| 04:16:03 | dansmith | both of the other milestones were merge commits | |
| 04:16:23 | mriedem | not intentionally | |
| 04:17:09 | dansmith | hrm, I don't understand, but whatever :) | |
| 04:17:22 | dansmith | glad you were here to tell me that | |
| 04:17:28 | dansmith | so I didn't wait all night | |
| 04:17:37 | mriedem | ha | |
| 04:17:54 | mriedem | would have to ask dhellmann tomorrow if there is magic behind the scenes | |
| 04:18:11 | mriedem | now that that's done, i suppose no one is around to actually merge and tag the damn thing | |
| 04:18:30 | dansmith | several I checked from ocata just now were merge commits too | |
| 04:18:43 | dansmith | mriedem: dims said he'd get it in the morning if ttx didn't first | |
| 04:18:56 | mriedem | yeah doug said they'd do it by the 10am CT release meeting | |
| 04:19:04 | dansmith | aye | |
| 04:20:15 | mriedem | alright, well f yeah, i'm going to watch some much deserved garbage tv and then go to bed | |
| 04:20:31 | dansmith | enjoy | |
| 04:20:42 | mriedem | thanks for shepharding | |
| 04:20:46 | mriedem | *shepherding? | |
| 04:20:48 | dansmith | np, g'nite | |
| 04:25:45 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/488283 | |
| 06:00:24 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecesary code https://review.openstack.org/488299 | |
| 06:01:27 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecessary code https://review.openstack.org/488299 | |
| 07:33:47 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Amend uuid4 hacking rule https://review.openstack.org/488315 | |
| 08:07:28 | openstackgerrit | longxingmiao proposed openstack/nova master: test review https://review.openstack.org/488328 | |
| 08:24:09 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test resize with placement api https://review.openstack.org/487958 | |
| 08:31:56 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: refactory some code on get_password https://review.openstack.org/449458 | |
| 08:35:25 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: add cert when send keystone request https://review.openstack.org/485121 | |
| 08:37:43 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Add quiesce and unquiesce in support matrix https://review.openstack.org/482390 | |
| 09:04:07 | bhagyashris | gibi: Hi, I have resolved my yesterday's issue there was some problem to restart the nfs server and for locking thing through nfs required statd service to enable. | |
| 09:09:44 | gibi | bhagyashris: good to hear that | |
| 09:11:02 | bhagyashris | gibi: Now everything is working fine to test the shared resource provider thing. I have just tested one scenario simply created instance as as mentioned in http://paste.openstack.org/show/616724/ but in my observation the root gb of created flavor has been considered in the allocations table against the compute resource provider and CUSTOM_DISK resource against "shared_resource" resource provider. | |
| 09:12:46 | bhagyashris | gibi: IMO, As i am creating the nfc backed instance so it should take the RAM and VCPU from the computes resource provider and DISK from the "shared_resource" provider | |
| 09:13:06 | bhagyashris | s/nfc/nfs | |
| 09:22:41 | gibi | bhagyashris: I don't know how can you tell nova that you want to consume DISK_GB not from the compute provider but from the shared one | |
| 09:23:07 | gibi | bhagyashris: this is why I suggested to use CUSTOM_DISK in the shared and then add CUSTOM_DISK to the flavor | |
| 09:23:20 | gibi | bhagyashris: that way I sure that the instance will consume from your shared provider | |
| 09:23:42 | gibi | bhagyashris: I hope others can help with this specific issue | |
| 09:29:56 | bhagyashris | gibi: ohk. thank you. | |
| 09:39:11 | SteveRUKC | hey all, quick question to which im struggling to find an answer. Is disk_allocation_ratio taken into account on live/cold migrations. As we have an allocation ratio of 6 set, but are having issues with migrations failing with a disk instance too large for target message. | |
| 09:39:34 | SteveRUKC | also, hypervisor_stats is showing a negative number for least_free | |
| 09:39:44 | SteveRUKC | if anyone has any ideas it would be most appreciated | |
| 09:48:14 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: trying to turn on periodic tasks https://review.openstack.org/488352 | |
| 09:53:39 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Optional separate database for placement API https://review.openstack.org/362766 | |
| 10:09:26 | dims | dansmith : looks like ttx took care of it 3 hours ago. w00t | |
| 10:14:46 | cdent | gibi: I did some similar periodic job fiddling last night and ran into the same confusion with the computes getting weird | |
| 10:15:15 | cdent | I’m guessing the fixture (or the the service) is not happy being in the same process with another version of itself? | |
| 10:29:49 | bhagyashris | cdent: Hi, Hi, I have resolved my yesterday's issue there was some problem to restart the nfs server and for locking thing through nfs required statd service to enable. | |
| 10:29:51 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] quash unicode warning with shared provider https://review.openstack.org/488363 | |
| 10:30:12 | cdent | bhagyashris: ah, cool, glad you were able to make it work | |
| 10:30:51 | bhagyashris | cdent: Now everything is working fine to test the shared resource provider thing. I have just tested one scenario simply created instance as as mentioned in http://paste.openstack.org/show/616724/ but in my observation the root gb of created flavor has been considered in the allocations table against the compute resource provider and CUSTOM_DISK resource against "shared_resource" resource provider. | |
| 10:31:09 | bhagyashris | cdent: IMO, As i am creating the nfs backed instance so it should take the RAM and VCPU from the computes resource provider and DISK from the "shared_resource" provider. | |
| 10:31:12 | kashyap | mdbooth: Thanks for the review! | |
| 10:31:56 | kashyap | And also to dansmith (About: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485752/, but not for the "summary" remark :P) | |
| 10:32:16 | cdent | bhagyashris: you can address that (at least in part) by using DISK_GB instead of CUSTOM_DISK for the nfs shared resource provider | |
| 10:32:17 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Maybe when you have a minute to ACK this straightforward change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485752/ | |
| 10:33:07 | cdent | the thing that will be missing is that there’s nothing currently in place to manage the allocation of disk on the shared resource provider, but that’s in progress with the claim in the scheduler stuff that is being worked on this week | |
| 10:36:25 | bhagyashris | cdent: ohk Means instead of creating the "CUSTOM_DISK" resource class and then creating the inventory for that I need to update the inventory against "DISK_GB" resource class right. | |
| 10:37:41 | cdent | bhagyashris: well basically the general rule is that if you can use a standard resource class (because it maps to the unit of resource a provider is providing) you may as well | |
| 10:39:43 | bhagyashris | cdent: ohk. checking... | |
| 10:48:08 | s-dean | Hello, could someone point me in the right direction to debug this nova.exception.NeutronAdminCredentialConfigurationInvalid' ? | |
| 10:50:10 | s-dean | nevermind | |
| 10:53:47 | bhagyashris | cdent: I have updated the inventory using DISK_GB resource class against the nfs shared resource provider but in that case after booting the instance it's not using shared_storage provider. | |
| 10:54:36 | bhagyashris | cdent: It address the disk used against compute node resource provider. | |
| 10:58:23 | vdrok | good morning everyone! | |
| 10:58:38 | vdrok | sdague: small request, if you have some time :) https://review.openstack.org/480624 | |
| 11:00:47 | vdrok | thanks! | |
| 11:01:01 | cdent | bhagyashris: ah, right, because the compue is reporting it’s own disk too, so is considered a valid target for all the resources. /me thinks | |
| 11:01:30 | cdent | bhagyashris: are you working from today’s master or something earlier? | |
| 11:02:29 | bhagyashris | cdent: yeah. I am working from todays master commit-id: 23c4eb34380bdf3eece11abbe0f6ccb68c060f47 "claim resources in placement API during schedule()" | |
| 11:07:10 | cdent | bhagyashris: do you have the log of it making the PUT /allocations requests? It might be that the scheduler is claimng one set of allocations, but later (in the periodic update) the resource tracker is changing things. if you’re going to be using the CUSTOM_DISK resource class you need to make sure your flavor doesn’t indicate any requests for disk_gb | |
| 11:07:53 | cdent | I think over the next few days things are likely to be quite unstable with claims, and there will be a few more changes coming | |
| 11:09:48 | bhagyashris | cdent: ohk. | |
| 11:10:28 | cdent | bhagyashris: it’s great that you’re doing this investigating, but right now is going to be a chaotic time | |
| 11:13:15 | cdent | bauzas: if this still alive? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427200/ | |
| 11:13:24 | bauzas | cdent: looking | |
| 11:13:47 | bauzas | cdent: well, maybe we should discuss with matt | |
| 11:13:58 | bauzas | I can rebase it | |
| 11:14:05 | bauzas | meanwhile | |
| 11:14:26 | cdent | k, thanks | |