| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-26 | |||
| 17:36:06 | dansmith | cburgess: donuts appreciated :P | |
| 17:36:53 | cburgess | dansmith hehe... yeah I didn't do donuts in Boston because mriedem said we wouldn't really have the right setup. I'll look into the donuts making a return in Denver. | |
| 17:37:24 | dansmith | cburgess: I'm only joking.. you're way over your donuts requirement quota | |
| 17:38:28 | vdrok | dansmith: ouch http://logs.openstack.org/58/487458/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ipmitool-postgres-ubuntu-xenial-nv/40fb4fb/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz waiting for hypervisors fail | |
| 17:39:05 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/487473 | |
| 17:40:27 | vdrok | the variable picked up by nova http://logs.openstack.org/58/487458/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ipmitool-postgres-ubuntu-xenial-nv/40fb4fb/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-07-26_16_06_41_216 | |
| 17:40:46 | dansmith | vdrok: gdi, nothing but bad news from you ever | |
| 17:40:56 | dansmith | vdrok: you never just stop by to say hi, always to say someting is broken! :) | |
| 17:40:56 | vdrok | :D | |
| 17:41:20 | vdrok | I promise to start the next day with 'good morning' to nova channel :) | |
| 17:41:25 | cburgess | dansmith You have sent me down a rabbit whole here reading all the options with that link to the code. Its nice to have all the options in one place but man its a bit scary reading some of this stuff. | |
| 17:42:05 | mriedem | is there anything i need to care about in the scrollback? | |
| 17:42:11 | mriedem | besides chet letting us down on donuts in boston? | |
| 17:42:14 | cburgess | mriedem donuts | |
| 17:42:18 | cburgess | lol | |
| 17:42:21 | dansmith | vdrok: http://logs.openstack.org/58/487458/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ipmitool-postgres-ubuntu-xenial-nv/40fb4fb/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_26_16_08_05_910044 | |
| 17:42:28 | dansmith | vdrok: looks like it created the compute node... | |
| 17:43:22 | vdrok | yup, but for some reason it's not picked up by hypervisor-stats | |
| 17:44:47 | dansmith | vdrok: and never by discover either | |
| 17:47:46 | dansmith | vdrok: okay I think this might be because this hack was for grenade and it's not complete enough for a fresh install | |
| 17:48:06 | dansmith | vdrok: I think we're pointing at super-conductor (which we want) but it's configured to point at cell0 (which we do not) | |
| 17:48:14 | dansmith | vdrok: so give me a few to mull this over | |
| 17:49:31 | openstackgerrit | Jackie Truong proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted certificates to InstanceExtras https://review.openstack.org/457711 | |
| 17:56:29 | dansmith | vdrok: updated the devstack change | |
| 17:57:51 | vdrok | dansmith: thanks! will come back if it fails again :D | |
| 17:57:55 | vdrok | good night | |
| 17:58:07 | dansmith | vdrok: o/ | |
| 18:30:22 | mriedem | jangutter: really only nits in the release note now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483459/ | |
| 18:30:28 | mriedem | but see what you think | |
| 18:32:51 | jangutter | mriedem: I'm working on getting our docs cleared for general release on our support site. Currently customers should have subscriptions, but they should be generally available by the time Pike gets released. | |
| 18:33:17 | jangutter | mriedem: should I respin and remove the soon? | |
| 18:47:58 | jaypipes | bauzas: answered. sorry, went to lunch | |
| 18:47:58 | sdague | dansmith: your cell1 db change didn't work | |
| 18:48:08 | sdague | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487478 | |
| 18:49:19 | sdague | dansmith: is there a reason you changed that? | |
| 19:01:24 | dansmith | sdague: didn't work how? but yes, we need to make that change | |
| 19:01:55 | dansmith | sdague: remember this was just a grenade hack, which meant conductor and other services were still configured to point at the cell db, not cell0 | |
| 19:02:07 | dansmith | on fresh with this they're configured wrong now | |
| 19:02:09 | bauzas | jaypipes: just reading your comment | |
| 19:02:14 | dansmith | sdague: didn't want to ask before pushing over top eh? | |
| 19:02:29 | bauzas | jaypipes: I'm a bit in and out till' 9pm my time but will think of your comment | |
| 19:02:32 | sdague | dansmith: I did, all the tests failed | |
| 19:02:36 | bauzas | oops 9.30pm | |
| 19:02:43 | sdague | cell1 db does not exist | |
| 19:03:09 | sdague | dansmith: http://logs.openstack.org/78/487478/4/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/69e2d2e/ | |
| 19:03:24 | dansmith | sdague: nova_cell1 should be created on L693 | |
| 19:03:36 | sdague | so given that jenkins -1ed that version of the patch I figured it was fine to run it the old way | |
| 19:03:49 | sdague | dansmith: well, it failed pretty hard | |
| 19:03:52 | openstackgerrit | Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Netronome SmartNIC Enablement https://review.openstack.org/483459 | |
| 19:04:27 | dansmith | it won't actually work without it, and the ironic people found it before jenkins | |
| 19:04:48 | sdague | dansmith: ok, but it doesn't pass with it | |
| 19:05:13 | dansmith | I get it, but we need to make the change | |
| 19:05:19 | sdague | http://logs.openstack.org/78/487478/4/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/69e2d2e/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2017-07-26_18_12_02_728 | |
| 19:05:36 | sdague | dansmith: that's fine, you need to help me figure out what other thing is also needed for that change to work | |
| 19:05:45 | dansmith | I'm doing it now | |
| 19:07:14 | dansmith | oh it's failing on the sync before we create it.. I wonder why that's different now | |
| 19:09:33 | sdague | because this function is creating the top level nova.conf | |
| 19:10:07 | sdague | https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/62edb2f0f64bf4ac2c75e9bbfffbad5aac5ad41c/lib/nova#L671-L680 | |
| 19:10:20 | sdague | the cell1 db is not created before the sync | |
| 19:10:24 | sdague | for the top level | |
| 19:11:01 | dansmith | right, because now that points to cell0 always in the toplevel and it's created already | |
| 19:11:16 | sdague | yes | |
| 19:12:22 | dansmith | so I switched the order of those things which I think will be fine for both cases | |
| 19:14:31 | sdague | ok, if that works, good enough | |
| 19:21:33 | sdague | dansmith: thanks for the grenade patch fix, I should put a safety wrapper around that for things that only need to set variables | |
| 19:22:03 | dansmith | sdague: np | |
| 19:33:01 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the useless fake ExtensionManager from API unittests https://review.openstack.org/486416 | |
| 19:33:11 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Move the note about '/os-volume_boot' to the correct place https://review.openstack.org/486071 | |
| 19:37:28 | mriedem | jangutter: +2, just need jaypipes to +W now | |
| 19:38:28 | jangutter | mriedem: I sincerely owe you guys. Thanks! | |
| 19:52:19 | bauzas | jaypipes: so I'm back | |
| 19:52:28 | jaypipes | bauzas: from outer space? | |
| 19:53:22 | bauzas | jaypipes: heh, just from my backyard :p | |
| 19:54:04 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 19:54:08 | bauzas | so I saw your comment | |
| 19:54:40 | bauzas | jaypipes: (and others) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483566/14/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py@170 | |
| 19:55:34 | bauzas | so, yeah, we have a self-heal by the RT.update_available_resource(), sure, agreed | |
| 19:55:55 | bauzas | but the problem I thought was about the fact that it's only running every 60 secs by default | |
| 19:56:45 | bauzas | so we could be having a race between the time we deleted the allocations from the source host, and when the source RT is again running update_a_r() | |
| 19:57:09 | bauzas | like, we could possibly accept other instances for this host even if it's not possible | |
| 19:57:53 | bauzas | or we could possibly accept some nested RPs to be used (like SRVIO VFs) meanwhime | |
| 19:58:43 | bauzas | jaypipes: so, I was thinking, should we maybe just get the original allocations from the source host before deleting them, so that if we have problems in the scheduler, we could put them again ? | |
| 19:59:22 | bauzas | jaypipes: something like _cleanup_allocations() would return for example | |
| 19:59:58 | bauzas | that said, given how we're close to FF, I wonder if it's possible | |
| 20:00:09 | bauzas | that's it for me. | |
| 20:00:11 | bauzas | :p | |
| 20:00:21 | bauzas | roger, roger. | |
| 20:00:36 | dansmith | bauzas: see my comment in there just now | |
| 20:01:32 | dansmith | mriedem: melwitt: I'm like quad booked for shit all day.. given where we are, do we have things to discuss for cells or should we put the meeting. I think we're down to the devstack stuff and placement related bits at this point | |
| 20:01:39 | dansmith | but if we have things, we can still do it | |
| 20:02:30 | melwitt | don't think we have to have a meeting but I was just gonna say the console stuff is still up and passing jenkins. I have a devstack change up that Depends-On the stack and runs console proxies per cell and that works too | |
| 20:02:31 | bauzas | dansmith: looking | |
| 20:03:03 | dansmith | melwitt: orly, okay, I should go look at that | |
| 20:03:11 | bauzas | melwitt: dansmith: mriedem: if you need me reviewing things before pike-3 for cells v2, just lemme know | |
| 20:03:20 | dansmith | if mriedem agrees, hopefully we just had our meeting | |
| 20:03:27 | dansmith | bauzas: console stuff | |
| 20:03:32 | bauzas | ok | |
| 20:04:19 | melwitt | CONSOLEZ. I'm about to update it to redact tokens in the debug logs but other than that, it's been ready. mostly unchanged from when PaulMurray was working on it | |
| 20:04:49 | mriedem | ok to ditch the meeting | |
| 20:05:09 | mriedem | what do we lose if we don't have the console proxy stuff done? | |