| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-25 | |||
| 18:54:16 | mriedem | you can't backport counting quotas to ocata | |
| 18:54:31 | mriedem | but the fix might already be available, which i pointd out in the bug report and marked it incomplete since they didn't provide the version | |
| 18:54:42 | sdague | mriedem: sure, but fixed in master does count as fixed | |
| 18:54:55 | sdague | then it's a backport question | |
| 18:55:08 | mriedem | it's incomplete either way at this point | |
| 18:55:09 | sdague | but that doesn't make it not fixed | |
| 18:55:16 | sdague | incomplete doesn't mean that | |
| 18:55:52 | sdague | sure, as long as we're talking about incomplete just meaning "question back to reporter that needs an answer" | |
| 18:56:42 | sdague | but if it's fixed in master, then I'd say it's probably correct to comment as such and put Fix Released on it | |
| 19:07:14 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add oslo_concurrency=INFO to default log levels for nova-manage https://review.openstack.org/487179 | |
| 19:09:32 | openstackgerrit | Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Add VIFHostDevice support to libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/486426 | |
| 19:18:11 | mriedem | sdague: dansmith: i've dumped my debug notes in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/ | |
| 19:18:31 | mriedem | we discover and map the compute node on the primary host as part of the devstack stack.sh run on the primary host, | |
| 19:18:42 | mriedem | we discover and map the subnodes (2 of them) after the subnodes are stacked | |
| 19:18:45 | openstackgerrit | Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Netronome SmartNIC Enablement https://review.openstack.org/483459 | |
| 19:18:57 | mriedem | but it looks like when discover_hosts runs, we only discover and map the subnode-2, but miss subnode-3 | |
| 19:19:10 | mriedem | so this might just be a latent issue in 3-node jobs | |
| 19:19:21 | mriedem | but makes me wonder why we don't hit this more often in 2-node jobs | |
| 19:24:53 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add some more cellsv2 doc goodness https://review.openstack.org/487183 | |
| 19:25:42 | dansmith | mriedem: okay I really hadn't done any 3 node thinking yet | |
| 19:25:59 | mriedem | dansmith: as far as i can tell, the 3rd node is being setup the same as the 2nd node | |
| 19:26:00 | dansmith | mriedem: are there actual production 3-node jobs that we'll break with this? | |
| 19:26:15 | mriedem | i don't know if there are any 3 node voting jobs, but i can dig | |
| 19:26:31 | dansmith | okay | |
| 19:26:34 | mriedem | i think we're basically getting lucky in the 2 node jobs | |
| 19:26:42 | openstackgerrit | Robert Ellis proposed openstack/nova master: Clarifying node_uuid usage in ironic driver. https://review.openstack.org/485803 | |
| 19:27:11 | mriedem | for example, this is a normal 2 node job | |
| 19:27:17 | mriedem | we discover subnode host here | |
| 19:27:18 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/66/483566/10/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/770b47e/console.html#_2017-07-24_16_27_34_062884 | |
| 19:27:21 | dansmith | meaning we're getting the first subnode from the main node? | |
| 19:27:23 | mriedem | 2017-07-24 16:27:34.062884 | + /opt/stack/new/devstack-gate/devstack-vm-gate.sh:main:L777: discover_hosts | |
| 19:28:00 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/66/483566/10/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/770b47e/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_24_16_27_35_403617 | |
| 19:28:00 | mriedem | and that subnode compute node was actually created after that | |
| 19:28:04 | mriedem | Jul 24 16:27:35.403617 ubuntu-xenial-2-node-osic-cloud1-disk-10046822-741313 nova-compute[1379]: INFO nova.compute.resource_tracker [None req-29fd1bd5-8730-42d5-8075-04acacfe704a None None] Compute node record created for ubuntu-xenial-2-node-osic-cloud1-disk-10046822-741313:ubuntu-xenial-2-node-osic-cloud1-disk-10046822-741313 with uuid: d09dec50-566e-41ea-adde-7ff566b63867 | |
| 19:28:17 | mriedem | dansmith: yes the first compute node comes from the primary | |
| 19:28:44 | mriedem | the compute node on the primary host gets discovered as part of the primary host setup https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/stack.sh#L1448 | |
| 19:28:48 | dansmith | okay | |
| 19:29:30 | mriedem | so our docs say | |
| 19:29:31 | mriedem | "Configure and start your compute hosts. Before step 7, make sure you have compute hosts in the database by running nova service-list --binary nova-compute." | |
| 19:29:42 | mriedem | step 7 is running discover_hosts | |
| 19:29:55 | mriedem | so, | |
| 19:30:16 | mriedem | what we should really probably be doing is passing a variable down from devstack-gate to the tools/discover_hosts.sh script in devstack telling it how many hosts we expect to show up | |
| 19:30:19 | mriedem | before doing discovery | |
| 19:30:33 | dansmith | I thought we were specifically not supposed to do that? | |
| 19:30:39 | dansmith | like, I thought we had an argument about that | |
| 19:31:13 | mriedem | well, if you've got a slow subnode then i'm not sure what the other options are | |
| 19:31:31 | mriedem | we have the periodic task, but that's still a race window | |
| 19:31:34 | dansmith | agreed, I just thought we were told not to | |
| 19:32:27 | mriedem | dansmith: isn't it fun we're having the same conversation we had almost exactly 6 months ago?! | |
| 19:32:34 | mriedem | except i was in cabo san lucas at that time, which was more fun | |
| 19:33:52 | mriedem | so, i dont think this is a problem in your fleetify change which is the key point | |
| 19:34:00 | dansmith | mriedem: do these graphs do anything for you? http://docs-draft.openstack.org/83/487183/1/check/gate-nova-docs-ubuntu-xenial/ef53873//doc/build/html/user/cellsv2_layout.html | |
| 19:34:00 | mriedem | it's just a latent thing we aren't handling well in our infra | |
| 19:34:01 | dansmith | mostly the second one | |
| 19:34:11 | dansmith | okay | |
| 19:34:44 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Translate the return value of attachment_create and _update https://review.openstack.org/486194 | |
| 19:35:10 | mriedem | dansmith: looks pretty good | |
| 19:35:38 | mriedem | the first graph is kind of a webby mess | |
| 19:35:40 | dansmith | wish I could fix a few visual aberrations on it, but it took a lot of screwing around to make it look this good | |
| 19:36:11 | dansmith | I spent less time on the first one I can muck some more | |
| 19:40:06 | sdague | mriedem: ok, so have you confirmed if the 3 node is voting yet? | |
| 19:40:10 | openstackgerrit | Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova master: hardware offload support for openvswitch https://review.openstack.org/398265 | |
| 19:40:42 | sdague | mriedem: I thought we were doing discover hosts at the end of the d-g run? | |
| 19:41:55 | mriedem | sdague: we are, | |
| 19:42:07 | mriedem | but the compute node getting created is asynchronous to that | |
| 19:42:18 | mriedem | the 3-node job could be slowing down the controller services just enough to hit the latent window | |
| 19:42:36 | sdague | because the startup of nova-compute takes that long? | |
| 19:43:14 | sdague | so the race is that nova-compute service start doesn't make it to the db before discover hosts runs? | |
| 19:44:59 | mriedem | yes | |
| 19:45:19 | mriedem | +1 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/ and my debug notes are all in there | |
| 19:46:36 | sdague | so... related, what's the deal with the stack trace here - http://logs.openstack.org/56/477556/5/experimental/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-ha-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/432c235/logs/subnode-3/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_25_15_06_55_309283 | |
| 19:47:23 | mriedem | that's the thing where the libvirt starts up and tries to enable itself | |
| 19:47:54 | sdague | ok, so we're going to stacktrace on every clean start | |
| 19:48:06 | mriedem | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3563 | |
| 19:48:09 | mriedem | sdague: that's been around | |
| 19:48:11 | mriedem | it's not a result of this change | |
| 19:48:19 | sdague | mriedem: sure | |
| 19:48:23 | sdague | it's just not good | |
| 19:48:37 | mriedem | yeah, i don't like it either | |
| 19:48:42 | sdague | ok, http://logs.openstack.org/56/477556/5/experimental/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-ha-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/432c235/logs/subnode-3/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_25_15_07_02_323379 is where the compute node is built, that's about 7 seconds later | |
| 19:48:54 | mriedem | yes | |
| 19:49:51 | mriedem | i'm not sure why these stacktrace | |
| 19:50:21 | mriedem | i guess because of https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3567 ? | |
| 19:50:33 | mriedem | so it hits the generic Exception block as ComputeHostNotFound_Remote? | |
| 19:50:39 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add some more cellsv2 doc goodness https://review.openstack.org/487183 | |
| 19:52:56 | sdague | mriedem: yeh | |
| 19:59:42 | sdague | mriedem: do we have a way of telling that nova-compute is ready. Is that resource tracker at 07_02 the event we need? | |
| 20:00:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: API ref: associate floating IP requires Active status https://review.openstack.org/363642 | |
| 20:00:48 | sdague | I'm trying to think about who should wait for what to get us there. Is there something we could tell from the subnode easily about it being ready so we knew we were in the clear when stack.sh finished? | |
| 20:01:18 | mriedem | sdague: our docs tell you to run 'nova service-list --binary nova-compute' and make sure the compute shows up before you run discover_hosts | |
| 20:02:37 | mriedem | because that API iterates all cells and gathers up the services running in them | |
| 20:02:42 | mriedem | so the host mapping isn't required for that | |
| 20:03:24 | sdague | so we could put a flag in to wait for compute | |
| 20:03:29 | sdague | and run: nova service-list --host `hostname` --binary nova-compute | |
| 20:03:43 | sdague | on the child until it is true? | |
| 20:08:00 | dansmith | not on the child, on the main node | |
| 20:08:41 | mriedem | right we run discover_hosts from the primary | |
| 20:08:48 | mriedem | b/c it needs to get to the api db to find the cell mappings | |
| 20:08:58 | mriedem | and the compute nodes don't have access to that | |
| 20:09:00 | dansmith | well and you need the main node to do the waiting | |