Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-07
11:30:38 cdent avolkov`++
11:36:17 avolkov` cdent: jaypipes: btw, there is some initiative to migrate docs, probably placement api ref would be the first one, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480991/
11:37:43 cdent avolkov`: yeah, saw that. I guess it makes sense given the docs migration spec (which feels a bit complicated but necessary)
11:38:00 cdent I reckon we should merge all the pending placement-api-ref before moving stuff?
11:39:24 jaypipes cdent: ++
11:42:27 avolkov` cdent: I think yes, we should have some accomplished thing before migration
11:52:33 bhagyashris cdent: Hi, Thanks for your responses and suggestions.
11:52:54 cdent bhagyashris: thank you for bringing it up
11:53:11 cdent I'll be making a new release of gabbi probalby today
11:53:18 cdent and then doing the global requirements changes
11:53:29 bhagyashris cdent: Actually I am new to gabbi trying to understand it.
11:53:46 bhagyashris cdent: Ohh, that will be great and thanks
11:56:05 bhagyashris cdent: Just for my understanding i am going to changes #215 and #216. and trying take it as assignment so I have few difficulties.
11:56:55 cdent bhagyashris: what do you mean by "take it as assigment"?
12:02:01 bhagyashris cdent: I have separately clone gabbi project and install in my environment. And applied the changes as in #216. But i am unaware about how to test the sample test.
12:03:36 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/477091
12:03:44 cdent bhagyashris: the new changes can be tested with: tox -epy27 -- test_intercept.data
12:04:00 cdent that will test just the tests in the data.yaml
12:04:01 bhagyashris cdent: ok
12:05:49 bhagyashris cdent: thanks
12:38:51 masber good morning, may I ask a question?
12:39:08 kashyap masber: Just ask :-)
12:40:04 masber I am trying to deploy a baremetal using ironic, my issue is that nova is telling me that I am exceeding my quota, however that is not true, I can see that I have enough resources
12:41:07 kashyap Hmm, afraid not sure about it myself, as I don't know much about Ironic.
12:41:27 masber is there a command to show the resources used?
12:41:31 kashyap A gentle note: Operator questions are best asked on #openstack-operators (or is it 'users'?)
12:42:31 kashyap masber: `nova quota-show`?
12:43:01 kashyap Depeding on what you're looking for, you may have to specify tenant
12:44:23 masber that will show me the whole quota, is there a way to see the free resources but from a quota point of view?
12:44:52 masber like an overview to see how many cpus, ram, disks I am currently using?
12:45:45 masber something like openstack hypervisor stats show but with quotas
13:16:22 openstackgerrit Anthony PERARD proposed openstack/nova master: Skip boot from encrypted volume on Xen+libvirt https://review.openstack.org/481627
13:19:05 cdent figleaf: yay! we don't agree on something!
13:48:18 figleaf cdent: oh, there's a lot. I'm just too polite to express myself :)
13:48:34 cdent figleaf: polite is never a word I heard near you
13:55:36 leakypipes dansmith: morning superdan.
13:55:58 superdan shame is so effective
13:56:02 leakypipes lol
13:56:13 leakypipes ah, knock-on effects. :)
13:56:29 fried_rice Happy Friday!
13:56:42 fried_rice Frieday
13:56:50 superdan we should do more of these three-day workweek deals
13:56:55 leakypipes heh
13:56:57 fried_rice +1
13:58:52 mriedem o/
13:59:26 leakypipes mriedem: mornin.
14:10:50 mriedem gmann: looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480815/1/specs/pike/approved/fix-to-return-server-groups-quota-in-quota-class.rst@51
14:11:04 mriedem did we also miss those other resources in the quota class api, like fixed ips, floating ips, etc?
14:11:08 mriedem or was it just 'networks'?
14:18:07 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Update quota class spec to filter out networks quota https://review.openstack.org/480815
14:26:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Update quota class spec to filter out networks quota https://review.openstack.org/480815
14:31:04 mriedem so who wants to review this change to use the cinder 3.27 attachments API flow in swap volume? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456971/
14:31:17 mriedem tempest has already passed on it from higher in the stack which triggers the new behavior
14:37:24 leakypipes mriedem: do you want me to move those two lines in the allocation candidates patch or do it in a followup patch?
14:37:35 mriedem leakypipes: follow up is fine
14:37:40 leakypipes k
14:53:03 mriedem ruh roh
14:53:44 mriedem superdan: melwitt: i know you're on a call, but after that, let me ruin your day https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/56cd608d3a199dcb02ac2ae071ff3057241259da/nova/compute/api.py#L3723
14:54:07 mriedem when attaching a volume to a shelved offloaded instance, we create the bdm in the api - so cell0
14:54:41 mriedem we must not have a tempest test for this
14:54:51 melwitt rats
14:55:13 mriedem could probably recreate with a functional test, but i'll start by reporting abug
14:56:40 mriedem hmm, AttachVolumeShelveTestJSON in tempest should test this
14:57:38 superdan guh
14:59:35 mriedem so either the tempest test is busted, or i'm missing something that makes this work
15:10:13 superdan mriedem: well, that clearly needs to be targeted
15:11:25 leakypipes cdent: thx for continuing your resource providers weekly summaries. good job catching up on all the change while you were on PTO. look to have gotten everything correct, AFAICT.
15:11:48 cdent leakypipes: it's my UVP
15:11:56 mriedem superdan: yeah, just really odd that the tempest test wouldn't fail, unless the test is broken
15:12:09 cdent thanks for the confirmation that I didn't miss anything obvious
15:12:20 superdan mriedem: yeah
15:12:50 superdan mriedem: does that fail with a constraint error, or do we just create it and then it never attaches on unshelve?
15:12:51 superdan because maybe the tempest test isn't validating via ssh
15:13:30 mriedem the tempest test does do some ssh counting of volumes on the guest
15:13:47 superdan mriedem: actually,
15:14:03 superdan mriedem: until my devstack patch, the control services are not pointing at cell0 for their default
15:14:07 superdan so that's why
15:14:27 mriedem hmm, so why doesn't your devstack patch fail on this though?
15:14:47 superdan mriedem: it'd be the canary against nova that d-o it that would fail
15:15:00 superdan this guy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473565/
15:15:08 superdan is that test new or something?
15:15:44 superdan hmm, nope passing in the canary
15:16:17 cdent leakypipes: requirements change for new gabbi if you're inclined to move that along: https://review.openstack.org/481665
15:19:21 mriedem tempest is configured to run ssh validatoin, so it should do this: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/compute/volumes/test_attach_volume.py#n181
15:19:54 mriedem maybe the counter is broken so it always reports 0 and it's comparing 0 to 0 and passes?
15:20:10 leakypipes cdent: done
15:20:14 superdan mriedem: heh
15:20:46 mriedem although this would fail http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/compute/volumes/test_attach_volume.py#n219
15:20:49 mriedem num_vol + 1
15:25:38 mriedem superdan: we need to update your canary patch to depend on I08d7da843d18b426dda8a8a231039d950a4c0ce5 now
15:25:59 mriedem shall i push the button?
15:26:11 superdan mriedem: I'm working on a target change, so I will do that when I'm done here
15:26:16 cdent thanks leakypipes
15:27:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Support tag instances when boot(3/4) https://review.openstack.org/459593
15:31:01 superdan mriedem: was there a bug for this shelved issue?
15:31:12 mriedem no, i can create one
15:31:22 superdan thanks
15:33:53 mriedem you know,
15:33:54 mriedem another thing,
15:34:16 mriedem when we shelve offload a server, we never clean up it's InstanceMapping,

Earlier   Later