Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-06
12:38:51 jaypipes resource_provider:
12:39:00 jaypipes uuid: <blah>
12:39:02 jaypipes etc etc
12:39:11 jaypipes cdent: make sense?
12:39:25 cdent full response, or piecemeal?
12:39:36 jaypipes cdent: would be awesome to have options.
12:39:58 jaypipes cdent: like http_response_full_expect: or something like that which would fail if not exact
12:40:27 jaypipes cdent: and otherwise, just fail if the listed parts of the http_response_expect: were not included in the response.
12:40:32 cdent piecemeal is hard because you need some way to say "this" allocations, and that's what led to the json paths
12:40:41 jaypipes understood.
12:40:43 jaypipes code is hard.
12:40:45 jaypipes :P
12:40:49 cdent the fully query stuff see this thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-July/119286.html
12:42:18 cdent in any case, you can fake the full stuff by matching the root ($) key, see last half of: https://gabbi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/jsonpath.html
12:42:42 jaypipes cdent: sure, but that's ugly as f**k :)
12:43:01 cdent that looks almost exactly what you have above (which is also ugly as fuck)
12:43:10 jaypipes ok, I'm done.
12:43:18 cdent heh
12:44:31 jaypipes cdent: oh, I see you're referring to the final example in that page
12:44:35 cdent yes
12:44:42 jaypipes cdent: and not the one above it..
12:44:51 cdent yes
12:45:05 cdent yeah, the filter stuff is ghastly, I agree
12:45:07 jaypipes cdent: didn't know I could do that.
12:45:36 cdent it just falls out of the nature of json path '$' is 'everything'
12:45:43 jaypipes cdent: that would work. though a little hackery would allow one to remove the need for the $:
12:46:14 jaypipes cdent: if, say, Gabbit saw a "response_yaml_exact" tag in the gabbit.
12:46:55 cdent jaypipes: if you read around in that thread, especially the message I linked to, there's some discussion on options for how to do it. A little more discussino ought to lead to some reasonable outcomes
12:47:31 cdent the main thrust of the thread is to be able to read in files that are the json, but it's the same deal in the abstract
12:47:49 bauzas cdent: out of curiosity because I had the problem on Monday, how can I introspect a gabbi functional test?
12:48:50 cdent bauzas: depends on the kind of introspection you want to be doing, but you can make an individual test 'verbose' with 'verbose: True' but frequently the output will be swallowed, depending on the environment
12:49:03 cdent another option is to add a response_strings:\n- something that won't match
12:49:10 cdent and then it will fail and you can see the response
12:49:14 bauzas cdent: basically debugging
12:49:19 bauzas ie. pdb'ing
12:49:34 bauzas since tox can't do that, I generally use testtools.run directly
12:50:08 bauzas but since placement tests are generated by an helper, I can't directly use it
12:50:26 bauzas because testtools.run can't find the test I wanted to debug
12:50:36 cdent subunit.run can
12:51:16 bauzas a-ha!
12:51:51 bauzas at least "python -m testtools.run discover --load-list my-list" is not possible
13:04:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Always refresh cache when checking extensions https://review.openstack.org/480674
13:04:12 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add '_has_dns_extension' function https://review.openstack.org/480675
13:04:13 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use dns_domain value from neutron in os-vif wiring https://review.openstack.org/480676
13:04:13 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: metadata: Don't use nova-net DNS values with neutron https://review.openstack.org/480616
13:12:41 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: metadata: Don't use nova-net DNS values with neutron https://review.openstack.org/480616
13:16:14 stephenfin mriedem, sean-k-mooney: Could either of you explain to me how 'os_vif.objects.network.Network' relates to 'nova.network.model.Network'?
13:16:57 stephenfin sorry - jaypipes ^
13:17:10 stephenfin I thought we were using the former in [1], but it seems we're not. What's the whole point of the os_vif version if we define our own model? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480676/
13:17:34 jaypipes stephenfin: the idea is to eventually get rid of the nova model.
13:17:46 jaypipes stephenfin: and have Neutron just return a serialized os-vif object.
13:18:04 jaypipes stephenfin: we're gradually getting there. but will be a while before we do.
13:18:20 stephenfin jaypipes: I'm guessing that means the 'neutron.objects.network.Network' model will go away then too?
13:18:22 stephenfin Ideally
13:18:52 jaypipes stephenfin: well, that may store some internal (to Neutron) stuff, so not sure...
13:18:58 stephenfin Well, maybe not, but neutron will translate 'neutron.objects.network.Network' -> 'os_vif.objects.network.Network' for sending over the wire
13:19:08 jaypipes stephenfin: os-vif objects are intended to be the shared model between nova and neutron.
13:19:17 jaypipes stephenfin: ya, zactly.
13:20:51 cdent bauzas: you can do something like the following. part of the trick is getting the name of the test right in the face of your discover path:
13:20:56 cdent .tox/functional/bin/python -m subunit.run discover -v nova/tests/functional/api/openstack/placement --load-list <(echo test_placement_api.allocations_check_usages.test_request) | subunit-trace
13:21:26 stephenfin jaypipes: Gotcha. Thanks for the info :)
13:22:52 bauzas cdent: okay
13:23:21 bauzas I need to look more at the subunit framework
13:23:35 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Store dns_domain value from neutron https://review.openstack.org/480676
13:23:35 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: metadata: Don't use nova-net DNS values with neutron https://review.openstack.org/480616
13:23:42 cdent that works for testtools.run as well. if you s/subunit/testtools/ is all good
13:23:52 cdent (and get rid of subunit-trace)
13:25:03 cdent bauzas: then I guess you'd hork pdb in there somewhere. What would your normal of doing that be?
13:25:49 bauzas I usually pdb.set_trace() somewhere and then I just python -m testtools.run the UT I wanna check
13:27:19 stephenfin bauzas: RE: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391060, I'm going to leave that til mriedem and melwitt come back to it, as they'd similar feedback and it's unchanged since
13:34:00 cdent bauzas: heh, turns out I wrote a faq about this a while ago: https://gabbi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html#is-gabbi-only-for-testing-python-based-apis
13:34:13 cdent whoops, wrong link: https://gabbi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html#how-do-i-run-just-one-test
13:37:07 jaypipes tox -efunctional && ./jay-get-breakfast.bash
13:37:29 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/nova master: Add Neutron port capabilities to devspec in request https://review.openstack.org/451777
13:48:49 bauzas stephenfin: fair enough
13:49:27 bauzas cdent: cool, I looked at the gabbi docs, but didn't find it
13:50:02 ildikov jaypipes: it could almost include breakfast and lunch... :)
13:51:11 dansmith jaypipes: that will get breakfast after the run, I think you want (tox -e functional&); ./jay-get-breakfast.sh
14:00:15 mriedem stephenfin: what happened to sfinucan?
14:01:21 stephenfin mriedem: I wanted cross-promotional, deal mechanics, revenue streams, jargon synergy
14:01:36 stephenfin i.e. I use 'stephenfin' everywhere else and wanted to switch here too
14:01:52 mriedem gah
14:02:56 stephenfin plus there's an 'e' missing from 'sfinucan' which has resulted in more than one incorrectly addressed email
14:03:01 cdent I'm suffering from brand dilution with this cdent/anticdent thing
14:03:25 stephenfin (that is also my Red Hat email alias, but not for long)
14:03:30 mriedem dansmith: i'm in a quandary if you have 5 minutes
14:03:53 mriedem otherwise i shall take it to the ML
14:03:57 dansmith mriedem: okay
14:04:08 stephenfin cdent: You should hire Liz Lemon - she's much better than me at this stuff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aocZo3oeNxw
14:04:39 mriedem dansmith: the extend volume change in nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454322/ - i started writing a tempest test for that yesterday, since there is also a cinder change,
14:04:53 mriedem the user (non-admin) can extend their volume in cinder, so like 1G->2G,
14:04:59 cdent stephenfin: she's probably busy
14:05:07 mriedem cinder will call the os-server-external-events API telling nova the volume attached to a server was resized,
14:05:21 mriedem we send that down to the compute to fiddle the os-brick bits (i'm channeling johnthetubaguy-speak here)
14:05:31 mriedem "fiddling bits" is a british term right?
14:05:47 dansmith mriedem: I believe it is yes
14:05:54 mriedem so i asked that an instance action get tracked on the nova side since this is all async,
14:05:57 mriedem that's done, all well and good,
14:06:00 edleafe stephenfin: I settled on 'edleafe' long ago for all my accounts. Not enough brain cells to keep track of different handles
14:06:12 mriedem problem comes in on the api user side trying to sort out when the actual operation is done on the nova side,

Earlier   Later