| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-05 | |||
| 16:27:17 | mordred | efried: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479818 is worth looking at - it's right in the midst of all of the discovery work | |
| 16:29:34 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cinder v3 detach to swap_volume https://review.openstack.org/456971 | |
| 16:29:35 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Remove check_detach https://review.openstack.org/446671 | |
| 16:29:36 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 16:29:57 | dansmith | efried: solidarity my brother. | |
| 16:35:25 | dansmith | mriedem: have you done any looking at this yet? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416521/ | |
| 16:35:26 | dansmith | doesn't look like it | |
| 16:40:45 | mriedem | dansmith: i looked at the LOC | |
| 16:40:51 | mriedem | and then i looked away | |
| 16:40:55 | mriedem | because i was flying over the pacific | |
| 16:41:08 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:59:20 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Always refresh cache when checking extensions https://review.openstack.org/480674 | |
| 16:59:21 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use dns_domain value from neutron in os-vif wiring https://review.openstack.org/480676 | |
| 16:59:21 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add '_has_dns_extension' function https://review.openstack.org/480675 | |
| 17:01:12 | dansmith | mriedem: cells meeting? | |
| 17:01:18 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 17:09:58 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: stephenfin running neutron ext-list on master also dos not have the dns extention enabled by default | |
| 17:18:10 | sean-k-mooney | igordcard: o/ | |
| 17:19:19 | melwitt | dansmith: what did you mean by "get back the instance" before conductor is called? like if they did a GET and got an instance that was made from a BuildRequest? | |
| 17:20:24 | dansmith | melwitt: well, I mean: I do a create, I get back my instance uuid, which previously meant that I passed my quota check already, so I could wait for it to either go active or error | |
| 17:20:49 | dansmith | melwitt: now, I get that back, and for a split second, the instance continues to be in my list, but then goes away | |
| 17:20:53 | dtp | mriedem was your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464280/ for me? | |
| 17:21:00 | melwitt | oh | |
| 17:21:18 | melwitt | hmm | |
| 17:21:33 | dansmith | melwitt: I have scripts that poll instance list for the instance I just created | |
| 17:21:41 | dansmith | which will be confused as the instance will now just disappear | |
| 17:22:09 | dansmith | melwitt: definitely a behavioral change, so I think going to error instead of deleted is required here, right? | |
| 17:22:25 | dansmith | which will put them over budget by one, but it's a shell of an instance anyway | |
| 17:23:57 | melwitt | dansmith: yeah, I need to look at it in more detail bc what I'm doing there is deleting the record from the instances table, which isn't what you would have been seeing in your instance list prior to conductor finishing its work. but whatever exception handling that happens from the OverQuota raise might probably wipe out the BuildRequest that was giving the instance back before | |
| 17:24:25 | dansmith | you're following the same pattern as the other resources, but those are created and deleted synchronously | |
| 17:24:57 | dansmith | melwitt: yeah, I think the buildreq will be gone, but you're not wiping out the instance record, | |
| 17:24:57 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: stephenfin so if i deploy designate i get dns-integration added when i run neutron ext-list | |
| 17:25:03 | dansmith | melwitt: you're setting it to deleted | |
| 17:25:12 | dansmith | melwitt: which is still findable via the instance map until purge | |
| 17:25:14 | melwitt | yeah, I know. the instances table record is created synchronously there too, it's just that prior to that, a BuildRequest is used to present an instance to keep the same behavior we had before moving instance create to conductor | |
| 17:25:25 | dansmith | melwitt: synchronous to the api call Imea | |
| 17:25:28 | dansmith | *I mean | |
| 17:25:43 | melwitt | okay, yeah | |
| 17:26:33 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: stephenfin this adds some dns field to the port info http://paste.openstack.org/show/614483/ | |
| 17:26:52 | melwitt | dansmith: so yeah, probably that's the only thing we can do, set it to ERROR | |
| 17:26:58 | dansmith | melwitt: aye | |
| 17:27:16 | dansmith | melwitt: and we need an instance action or fault message or something so people can tell why | |
| 17:27:29 | dansmith | melwitt: otherwise they'll just go create again, which I guess will probably fail immediately, but still | |
| 17:28:00 | melwitt | dansmith: right. yeah, good point | |
| 17:32:44 | melwitt | dansmith: I have a crazy idea of maybe counting BuildRequests as part of the instances count. not sure if there's any gotchas there | |
| 17:33:01 | melwitt | to make it so we dont return an instance if we go over quota during a race in the first place | |
| 17:33:07 | dansmith | melwitt: meaning counting both and taking the sum? | |
| 17:33:31 | melwitt | yeah | |
| 17:33:38 | dansmith | I don't think you can do that naively unless you filter out the dupes, because we do have dupes for a bit right? | |
| 17:33:49 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: if i boot a new instace after designate is there it correct populates the server name from the create command into the hostname and fqdn fields http://paste.openstack.org/show/614486/ | |
| 17:34:07 | dansmith | melwitt: we create the instance and then delete the buildreq so the api code starts looking at the actual instance, IIRC | |
| 17:34:19 | melwitt | dansmith: hm, I didn't realize it dupes | |
| 17:34:25 | melwitt | yeah | |
| 17:34:29 | melwitt | dangit | |
| 17:34:31 | dansmith | melwitt: two different databases, so it can't be atomic | |
| 17:52:31 | jaypipes | bauzas, cdent, dansmith: sorry for being absent today, guys :( been struggling with allergies all day. can't seem to shake em. | |
| 17:53:17 | cdent | jaypipes: hot baths and spicy foods | |
| 17:53:35 | jaypipes | cdent: yes, but not together. | |
| 17:53:46 | cdent | spicy foods in the hot tub! | |
| 17:54:03 | dansmith | jaypipes: s'okay, I'm allergic to florida too | |
| 17:54:12 | jaypipes | dansmith: ack | |
| 17:55:40 | dims | LOL | |
| 18:26:37 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/nova master: Read Neutron port 'binding_profile' during boot https://review.openstack.org/449257 | |
| 18:49:40 | ildikov | mriedem: hi | |
| 18:50:13 | ildikov | mriedem: patches are nice and green if you would happen to have time to review: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/cinder-new-attach-apis :) | |
| 19:18:29 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix error message when support matrix entry is missing a driver https://review.openstack.org/480708 | |
| 19:22:22 | openstackgerrit | Rick Bartra proposed openstack/nova master: Add policy granularity to the Flavors API https://review.openstack.org/449288 | |
| 19:46:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add ability to signal and perform online volume size change https://review.openstack.org/454322 | |
| 19:47:19 | efried | mordred https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479818 looks like exactly a case where your new stuff needs to be used. | |
| 19:47:42 | mordred | efried: yup. if you don't beat me to it - I'll write a patch | |
| 19:48:04 | efried | mordred And all the supporting code is merged at this point? | |
| 19:48:12 | efried | And in a ksa release that's percolated through g-r? | |
| 19:48:36 | mordred | efried: yes - merged. no - not released yet - need to respond to some reviews on the docs update patch | |
| 19:48:55 | mordred | efried: and I was hoping I could get the service-types support in | |
| 19:49:13 | efried | mordred Then the novaclient patch has to wait for that, neh? | |
| 19:49:50 | mordred | efried: yah - although if it's urgent we could likely talk to folks about cutting a release once the docs patch lands, then doing another one once service-types is in | |
| 20:33:51 | openstackgerrit | Mathieu Gagné proposed openstack/nova master: Add ability to signal and perform online volume size change https://review.openstack.org/454322 | |
| 22:57:04 | openstackgerrit | Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Only setup iptables for metadata if using nova-net https://review.openstack.org/480765 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-06 | |||
| 00:37:25 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add ability to signal and perform online volume size change https://review.openstack.org/454322 | |
| 01:27:00 | Kevin_Zheng | ping mriedem | |
| 01:27:21 | mriedem | pong | |
| 01:29:50 | Kevin_Zheng | Hi, about tag creation | |
| 01:29:54 | Kevin_Zheng | http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/objects/tag.py#n70 | |
| 01:30:33 | Kevin_Zheng | it is a class method and takes ['tag1','tag2'] as param | |
| 01:30:44 | Kevin_Zheng | so I think it cannot be used directly | |
| 01:30:54 | mriedem | because we have a TagList, | |
| 01:31:01 | mriedem | so you'd have to convert the TagList to a list of simple tags | |
| 01:31:15 | mriedem | tags = [tag.tag for tag in tags] | |
| 01:31:18 | mriedem | something like that right? | |
| 01:31:26 | Kevin_Zheng | besides, build_request contains TagList.obj so I build taglist in API layer | |
| 01:31:27 | Kevin_Zheng | yes | |
| 01:32:32 | mriedem | i wonder if people would be ok with checking the type for the tags parameter in TagList.create | |
| 01:32:42 | mriedem | and if it's a TagList, convert it to a simple form | |
| 01:33:27 | mriedem | it's just a lot more efficient to do it that way in a single call if we have multiple tags for the server | |
| 01:34:00 | mriedem | because every separate tag create call does this extra _check_instance_exists_in_project db query | |
| 01:34:02 | mriedem | and context switch | |
| 01:34:28 | Kevin_Zheng | you mean do it in objects/tag.py? | |
| 01:34:53 | mriedem | well that would abstract the check which would be nice and clean, but people might not like that, like dansmith | |
| 01:35:25 | mriedem | otherwise we could just convert the TagList to a simple list in the conductor method | |
| 01:35:37 | mriedem | i think passing the TagList object from the compute api to conductor is still ok and what we want | |