Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-06-12
11:28:15 cdent roger that
11:32:30 tyrefors Hi. I'm trying to migrate some instances from a Liberty compute node that uses NFS for instances to a Mitaka compute node (in the middle of an upgrade) that uses local disc for instances, but I'm getting some errors that I can't find a solution to: NBD in tunnelled migration is currently not supported
11:32:39 tyrefors Anyone have some smart tips for me?
12:20:45 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/472814
12:23:18 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: explain payload inheritance in notification devref https://review.openstack.org/453667
12:23:19 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add snapshot id to the snapshot notifications https://review.openstack.org/453077
12:31:29 openstackgerrit Matt Wisch proposed openstack/nova master: Corrected compute_monitors setting help https://review.openstack.org/468538
12:41:34 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.updateprop notification https://review.openstack.org/462576
12:43:09 openstackgerrit Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Nova Quobyte volume driver to mount via systemd-run https://review.openstack.org/432344
13:05:38 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: fix memory locking limit https://review.openstack.org/472633
13:05:46 openstackgerrit Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova master: Delete all inventory has its own method DELETE https://review.openstack.org/460147
13:13:14 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.update_metadata notification https://review.openstack.org/460625
13:20:31 openstackgerrit Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Removes potentially bad exit value from accepted list in Quobyte volume driver https://review.openstack.org/453537
13:27:27 bauzas edleafe: I have to pick my daughter at school and go to some doctor thingy
13:27:35 bauzas edleafe: so I'll miss the scheduler meeting
13:27:45 mriedem artom_: i'm confused on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468319/ - you said it's already fixed in ocata, but then why was it a problem on master (pike)? or was it not a problem on pike, and only an issue in newton?
13:28:08 bauzas edleafe: I left some comments on jaypipes's spec, basically agreeing with the direction but needing some clarifications
13:28:33 bauzas edleafe: apart from that, nothing urgent in my pipe, and I did read cdent's weekly status
13:28:53 bauzas edleafe: I should be back in 1h 1/2-ish
13:28:55 bauzas \o
13:30:25 edleafe bauzas: ack
13:30:44 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: remove related pinning from __init__ of InstanceNUMATopology https://review.openstack.org/408242
13:30:44 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: remove cpuset_reserved from __init__ of InstanceNUMATopology https://review.openstack.org/466030
13:30:45 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: remove pagesize from __init__ of InstanceNUMATopology https://review.openstack.org/408241
13:34:00 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: remove ugly local import https://review.openstack.org/450787
13:34:01 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: remove get_nw_info_for_instance from compute.utils https://review.openstack.org/451387
13:35:33 mriedem artom_: nvm, you're right, wtf https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400763/
13:37:46 cdent rfolco: when you say "the new tests are still dependent of this change" which change do you mean?
13:38:37 rfolco cdent, hey. those tests were created to check resource generation after delete and put.
13:39:08 rfolco cdent, so, without the current change, the new tests won't work. Makes sense ?
13:39:35 cdent no, because you haven't changed anything on the placement server side in that patchset
13:39:35 mriedem sfinucan: are you aware of any way to share a subset of dedicated cpus for an instance, e.g. my vm wants 8 vcpus, it is willing to share 2 of them but needs 6 of them dedicated just to itself.
13:39:51 cdent rfolco: you've only changed the client side
13:40:04 cdent and the gabbi tests don't interact with the client side
13:40:10 sfinucan mriedem: No, it's all or nothing
13:40:32 mriedem ok, thanks for confirming
13:41:14 rfolco cdent, well, I'm confused, because I had to increase the expected resource gen for each of those tests
13:42:00 cdent rfolco: because of changes that are already merged, yes?
13:42:27 cdent (when you added the DELETE method to the server)
13:44:27 artom_ mriedem, you had me doubting myself for a second there
13:44:39 artom_ I didn't hallucinate the code being duplicated
13:44:52 rfolco cdent, so why we actually do those increments like self._resource_providers[rp_uuid]['generation'] = cur_rp_gen + 1 ?
13:45:22 mriedem artom_: heh yeah i hadn't seen the actual code in that ocata backport yet
13:45:46 rfolco cdent, I remember after that suggestion on previous patchset, I had to change the gabbit tests and increase resource gen
13:45:48 cdent rfolco: because we can assume that on the server side the generication has incremented, because that's what happens when you do a write. the client side adjustment is to help keep the client side cache in sync
13:45:58 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: utils: Replace 'utf8' with oslo.utils equivalent https://review.openstack.org/466799
13:46:45 rfolco cdent, fair. I'll address the new tests in a separate patch. Thanks.
13:46:54 artom_ Anyways, I'm supposed to be on PTO and I have two toddlers running around, I shouldn't even be here
13:47:02 cdent rfolco: no, thank you
13:47:14 jaypipes bauzas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473377/ is the initial work around the alternative allocation requests implementation.
13:47:28 rfolco cdent, no? :)
13:47:33 lyarwood mriedem / artom_ ; what on earth, that was a webui cherry pick as it had recently been modified, I assumed gerrit wouldn't allow you to do something like this but nvm...
13:47:49 cdent rfolco: as in: no need to thank me, you're the one doing the hard work here
13:48:31 rfolco cdent, heh thank you for the patience and guidance on placement api stuff.
13:55:11 edleafe Scheduler subteam meeting in 5 minutes in #openstack-meeting-alt
13:55:34 openstackgerrit Matt Wisch proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Corrected compute_monitors and non_inheritable_image_properties help text https://review.openstack.org/468538
14:01:02 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add snapshot id to the snapshot notifications https://review.openstack.org/453077
14:01:02 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: explain payload inheritance in notification devref https://review.openstack.org/453667
14:03:19 dansmith mriedem: that graceful pass was hiding 17 tests that didn't know about BuildRequest
14:05:42 mriedem dansmith: in the scheduler meeting, but i'm going to have to parse your replies in there
14:08:46 sfinucan jaypipes: Quick q: do online migrations need a corresponding upgrade reno? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469147/
14:09:07 jaypipes sfinucan: I don't think so... mriedem? ^
14:09:38 mriedem not really if it's all internal state changery - people are expected to run online data migrations each upgrade
14:09:57 openstackgerrit Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Increase test coverage https://review.openstack.org/473479
14:32:33 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old service version check for mitaka https://review.openstack.org/472395
14:40:15 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add key_name field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/463002
14:41:19 hferenc hi all
14:41:25 hferenc just one small thing
14:41:35 hferenc can someone please put this patch into his/her review queue?
14:41:40 hferenc https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464002/
14:41:41 cdent jaypipes: I didn't get a chance in the meeting to respond on the pushing wips or debate on spec first: i say go ahead and push wips as long as we're all flexible enough to tolerate some change
14:42:13 alex_xu jaypipes: the traits integration you mentioned is that the GET /allocation_requests support traits?
14:43:18 mriedem dansmith: ok want to talk about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472395/2/nova/conductor/manager.py@484 ?
14:43:34 mriedem er
14:43:35 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472395/2/nova/conductor/manager.py@a487
14:43:45 dansmith mriedem: see my update?
14:44:06 dansmith mriedem: you're right, we should always raise there now,
14:44:21 dansmith and we were covering up some legacy tests with that, including one checking specifically for "old api" nodes
14:45:44 jaypipes alex_xu: yes, but also the integration of traits into flavors...
14:46:05 alex_xu jaypipes: cool, ++ for that :)
14:49:07 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add BDM to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/448779
14:50:12 mriedem dansmith: did you see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472395/2//COMMIT_MSG@9 ?
14:50:34 mriedem i think it's checking for newton api, not liberty
14:51:08 dansmith mriedem: I didn't, but I looked up the history, let me go check
14:54:03 sdague dansmith: can you look at this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466658 - because you were on the original patch
14:54:13 dansmith mriedem: it's checking for >=12, which means 11 is the one it is concerned about
14:54:31 dansmith mriedem: 11 was 86a80062
14:55:12 dansmith which added compute rpc 4.12, which was "early newton" I guess
14:55:16 dansmith but not final
14:56:02 mriedem service version 11 was newton https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287997/
14:56:12 rmk Someone pasted code with a comment from me in it. What did I break this time? :(
14:56:21 mriedem anyway, that's not how i read the commit message
14:56:23 dansmith mriedem: it was during newton, notfinal newton
14:56:35 mriedem dansmith: that change is in stable/newton
14:56:37 dansmith mriedem: but yes, I think it needs to be "newton checking for mitaka api"
14:56:47 dansmith mriedem: yes, I know
14:56:52 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.resize_prep notification https://review.openstack.org/465081
14:57:32 dansmith mriedem: the title is "check for mitaka" so I think I got that right and then just wrote the rest of the commit message later and was off by one
14:57:48 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: is the intenet to model traits request as an extention fo the flavor extra spec or will a new mechanisume be introduced to model this
14:58:00 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old service version check for mitaka https://review.openstack.org/472395

Earlier   Later