Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-23
18:54:04 mriedem why it's that way, you'd have to ask vish or someone
18:54:44 sdague or mordred or jaypipes
18:54:47 mordred I don't think it needs to change -since it's clearly documented and has obviously been implemented on purpose -- I've got the conversion call written on my side now
18:54:54 mriedem yeah no sh*t, *those* guys
18:55:01 mordred jaypipes: oh - you're here ... can you tl;dr me? ^^
18:55:35 jaypipes mordred: ya, me here.
18:55:37 mordred mriedem: would I be safe in assuming that anywhere nova takes a date it's gonna be in that format and not full ISO?
18:55:56 mriedem i don't know where else we take a date
18:56:51 mriedem the compute api ref has a standard description for fields in the response that are a datetime
18:57:41 mriedem e.g. https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/api-ref/source/parameters.yaml#L1648
18:57:58 jaypipes sdague: I have no part in the making of os-simple-tenant-usage...
18:58:58 sdague mordred: the best recollections I've got are there are at least 3 different time formats because people picked things oddly (all predates me)
18:59:20 sdague I think the oslo utils actually take any of them and digest into the same thing
18:59:39 sdague that was an early markmc push from when I first showed up
19:02:52 mordred edleafe: ah - that probably makes sense
19:03:07 mordred sdague: nod. hrm - I should ping markmc and ask him what he remembers
19:03:41 mordred I mostly found it weird since we ALSO use the iso8601 library in OpenStack ... so doing work to support a subset of ISO 8601 just seems weird
19:04:32 sdague when did iso8601 get added?
19:04:41 sdague you have to realize, a lot of this code is 2012 era stuff
19:08:41 sdague mordred: simple tenant usage is 7726b3d763a136347f2324e630f0a3cdc60a045b (Aug 2011)
19:08:59 sdague iso8601 is 7726b3d763a136347f2324e630f0a3cdc60a045b (Mar 2011)
19:09:20 sdague it just looks like simple tenant usage was written to python date format and straight to db
19:09:53 mordred sdague: man - 2011 was a long time ago
19:09:57 sdague yep
19:10:00 sdague git log -S for the win
19:10:04 mordred ++
19:10:45 mriedem efried: did you see that nova-specs docs on longer build?
19:10:56 mriedem /home/user/git/nova-specs/doc/source/specs/juno/implemented/pci-passthrough-sriov.rst:412:Citation [VIF_DETA] is not referenced.
19:11:01 mordred sdague: fwiw - today I added a default value to shade for "start" of 2010-07-06 - since it's impossible for an openstack cloud to have usage going back before that :)
19:12:41 mriedem *no longer
19:13:35 efried mriedem "nova-specs docs on longer build"?
19:13:51 efried oh...
19:13:53 mriedem http://logs.openstack.org/81/461481/3/gate/gate-nova-specs-docs-ubuntu-xenial/9e65575/console.html#_2017-05-23_18_19_21_056047
19:13:55 mriedem and local
19:14:06 mriedem started in the last 24 hours
19:15:08 mriedem the citations in that file all look ok to me
19:15:22 efried jaypipes Thanks, will peruse.
19:15:42 efried mriedem Sorry, what does "nova-specs docs no longer build" mean?
19:15:49 jaypipes efried: peruse. persue. do with it what you may :)
19:16:02 mriedem efried: you asked jaypipes to review your nova-specs patch, right?
19:16:04 mriedem he approved it,
19:16:06 mriedem it failed in the gate,
19:16:13 mriedem meaning the docs job for nova-specs is broken
19:16:22 sdague mordred: nice
19:16:23 efried mriedem Oh.
19:16:25 mriedem looking at logstash, something changed in the last 24 hours
19:16:30 mriedem my guess is some upstream library
19:16:38 efried Not by design
19:16:43 efried or because I'm a bad, bad person.
19:16:49 mriedem i recreated locally
19:16:57 mriedem i'm checking to see which packages changed in the last 24 hours
19:17:14 mriedem but it's nearly nap:30 here and i'm having a hard time caring
19:23:56 mriedem i don't see any recent package releases that look related
19:26:34 mriedem efried: it's sphinx 1.6.1
19:27:03 efried mriedem Cool, guess nova-specs doesn't get auto-updates to requirements from g-r.
19:27:12 mriedem nova-specs doesn't use upper-constraints
19:27:14 efried mriedem Shall I propose that?
19:27:23 mriedem no
19:27:33 efried (the !1.6.1, that is, not adding the bot)
19:27:35 mriedem well, it's on purpose for some reason
19:28:11 mriedem i've go the thing local
19:28:13 mriedem just writing the bug
19:29:06 cdent edleafe: quick! rewrite placement to use etcd while I feed jaypipes crunchie bars
19:29:08 mriedem i don't really know why we don't use upper-constraints for building nova-specs docs really
19:29:13 jaypipes melwitt: tell James I'm going to hire a choir of angels to sing to him. :)
19:30:09 sdague mriedem: it just never got there
19:30:38 sdague the assumption I think is it was just fast enough to locally fix
19:30:39 melwitt jaypipes: lol :)
19:30:53 mriedem sdague: i don't even know that the docs jobs would use it anyway
19:30:57 mriedem since they don't do tox -e docs
19:31:03 mriedem i think they do build_sphinx directly right?
19:31:06 jaypipes cdent: nom nom!
19:31:07 sdague mriedem: yeh, good point, I don't know
19:35:08 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Blacklist sphinx 1.6.1 https://review.openstack.org/467367
19:38:21 openstackgerrit christopher.uhler proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt volume driver for Veritas HyperScale https://review.openstack.org/443951
19:40:34 mriedem UK things
19:40:43 mriedem probably have toffee in them
19:41:49 melwitt heh
19:44:26 penick @jaypipes congrats on the fiber rich bug smash
19:45:00 mriedem dansmith: looks like you dropped something in the rebase https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460616/5
19:46:16 openstackgerrit Lucian Petrut proposed openstack/nova master: [wip] Hyper-V: accept Glance vhdx images https://review.openstack.org/467369
19:46:55 dansmith mriedem: hmm, not sure how that happened, but okay
19:47:04 mriedem also,
19:47:13 mriedem _find_service was removed in ps4 but not ps5
19:47:56 dansmith oh, I see, you pushed to my set
19:47:58 dansmith I didn't realize, sorry
19:51:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: re-Allow adding computes with no ComputeNodes to aggregates https://review.openstack.org/460616
19:51:56 cdent penick: you get a gold star
19:51:56 dansmith mriedem: how about that?
19:52:09 penick ;)
19:53:35 mriedem god damn we should restrict updating an instance until it's active
19:53:40 edleafe penick: was going to respond to the list, but you used all the good puns
19:54:10 melwitt mriedem: I thought we did that already. or was that only tags
19:54:11 edleafe penick: couldn't think of a clever way to say that crap doesn't stick to porcelain, but sure seems to stick to nova
19:54:18 mriedem melwitt: tags
19:54:21 mriedem look at this fing mess https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L2732-L2782
19:54:51 dansmith mriedem: did you mean to remove the line range when referring to the thing that is a fing mess?
19:55:03 melwitt hah that
19:55:14 mriedem line range is in there
19:55:55 dansmith mriedem: what I meant was, you could say "just look at this fing mess" with this link and be quite valid: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py

Earlier   Later