Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-23
01:08:13 openstackgerrit Ngo Quoc Cuong proposed openstack/nova master: Remove translation of log messages https://review.openstack.org/466957
01:46:46 openstackgerrit John Haan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume_type with BDM paramter https://review.openstack.org/466595
02:00:07 mriedem dansmith: looks like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464059/ is happy
02:26:28 mriedem efried: it's starred but i'm shot, ping me about it tomorrow
02:27:08 mriedem efried: and review this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459753/ since you asked me to review something
02:28:49 mriedem xenserver ci seems to have gone nuts
02:54:25 jichen mriedem: hi, sorry, could you please help in guide some 3rd CI related questions?
02:59:19 mriedem jichen: if you're not proposing a driver in-tree then running after patches merge is fine, it's really up to you as it's all external to nova
02:59:31 mriedem jichen: i don't see value in reporting CI results to nova changes for an out of tree driver
03:00:35 jichen mriedem: we want to make it in tree just like powervm did in last cycle, we knew CI is the mandatory work that we need to show
03:01:07 mriedem jichen: powervm worked on that for about 2 years i think
03:01:23 mriedem btw, which z driver is this for? because there are at least 3 z-related drivers
03:01:24 jichen mriedem: so some of my colleagues thought the only request is to report 'gate' result while my understanding is we need report in 'check' work
03:01:49 mriedem jichen: there is no guide really
03:01:59 jichen mriedem: https://github.com/openstack/nova-zvm-virt-driver is the one we are working on
03:02:18 mriedem honestly no one upstream is even thinking about adding zvm in tree because it hasn't come up
03:03:10 jichen mriedem: actually we have been work on open source for a few years but our CI is not ready and need more resource, we knew CI is mandatory so we didn't bring it up until now
03:03:27 mriedem i think you might have asked me about this in barcelona? or someone did in atlanta?
03:03:34 mriedem the zHPM (?) thing also came up
03:03:39 mriedem which is a different team
03:03:52 mriedem and zKVM still never started any CI, which they talked about doing since Paris
03:04:12 jichen yes, they are from India team and you can think they zHPM are barematel on z
03:04:52 mriedem jichen: well, nothing is going to happen in pike,
03:04:59 jichen there are 3 different hypervisors z/VM is old one and last for some big customers like ADP etc, zKVM is a new one and libvirt based , DPM (zHPM) is more like a barematel thing
03:05:17 mriedem i think we've previously told z driver people and huawei fusionsphere people to follow what the powervm team did,
03:05:25 jichen mriedem: yes, I know, so we want to bring this out at next PTG
03:05:56 jichen mriedem: ok, for the CI , we need to be as good as or better to PowerVM, need 'check' for every patch, right?
03:06:36 mriedem i'd need to ask thorst or efried what they were doing, but i thought their ci was pretty solid on their out of tree driver first, including on check queue changes
03:07:01 mriedem but their driver is also quite different from the zvm driver i believe, but honestly i don't really know anything about the zvm driver architecture,
03:07:03 mriedem so i can't really say
03:07:26 mriedem this probably needs some advertising on the dev ML first
03:07:46 mriedem if you guys have summit sessions / slides / whatever that might be a good start
03:08:38 jichen ok, we do have some thing there, I already drafted a WIP spec there, I will try to collect whatever info needed and send in the ML
03:08:48 jichen thanks a lot for your info and guide
03:15:28 mriedem jichen: sure, sorry i can't be of more help. i'd talk to thorst and the powervm team about their experience.
03:16:51 jichen mriedem: thanks a lot for your help and we will try to make PTG/summit and show more info there
03:21:59 openstackgerrit Ngo Quoc Cuong proposed openstack/nova master: Remove translation of log messages https://review.openstack.org/466995
03:31:12 openstackgerrit John Haan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume_type with BDM paramter https://review.openstack.org/466595
03:33:18 mriedem ha ^
03:36:24 mriedem cburgess: ^
03:36:51 mriedem cburgess: i think if you can get enough different cloud providers to open separate specs to pass through the volume type, at some point we just have to give in
03:37:15 mriedem it's in page 45 of the nova core dungeon master's guide
03:50:53 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: List/show all server migration types (1/2) https://review.openstack.org/430608
04:04:28 openstackgerrit falseuser proposed openstack/nova master: [BugFix] Change the condition to delete a resizing instance https://review.openstack.org/463466
07:06:19 openstackgerrit Ngo Quoc Cuong proposed openstack/nova master: Remove translation of log messages https://review.openstack.org/466995
07:34:25 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate unused policy from policy doc https://review.openstack.org/465505
07:45:58 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: List/show all server migration types (2/2) https://review.openstack.org/459483
08:03:59 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend the "list-show-all-server-migration-types" spec https://review.openstack.org/460847
08:26:25 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: network: update pci request spec to handle trusted tags https://review.openstack.org/458820
08:26:25 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: configure trust mode for vfs https://review.openstack.org/458514
08:26:26 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: network: add command to configure trusted mode for VFs https://review.openstack.org/458513
08:32:29 sfinucan johnthetubaguy, alex_xu: Could you take a look at [1] as it's blocking 4 other patches [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461630/
08:33:49 sfinucan oomichi too ^
08:35:29 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI use os-xenapi v2 in nova https://review.openstack.org/453493
09:32:08 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Fix parameter order in os-services.inc https://review.openstack.org/467099
09:47:19 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Send out notifications when instance tags changed https://review.openstack.org/459923
09:54:14 openstackgerrit Felipe Alfaro Solana proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Implements: blueprint nova-lxd-profiles https://review.openstack.org/467104
09:57:14 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for os-migrations endpoint instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/461628
09:59:50 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for os-migrations endpoint instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/461628
10:02:09 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for os-services endpoint instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/460818
10:09:48 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.resize_prep notification https://review.openstack.org/465081
10:18:30 openstackgerrit Vu Cong Tuan proposed openstack/nova master: Repair links in Nova documentation https://review.openstack.org/467114
11:15:36 artom o_O
11:16:05 artom https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400763/3 merged without unit tests
11:16:30 artom Is that legit? We're allowed to do that? I'd have though making sure the exception is caught would be a good test
11:32:54 sfinucan artom: Hmm, yeah. It should have tests, yes
11:47:48 sfinucan sdague: If I want to check out a particular commit of nova and run it with Devstack, I simply check it out and reboot all nova services with 'systemctl restart devstack@n-*', right?
11:48:10 sfinucan (First time tinkering with it since the systemd changes went in)
11:48:21 sdague yep
11:50:08 sfinucan cool
12:16:46 openstackgerrit Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova master: Implement ScaleIO image backend https://review.openstack.org/407440
12:17:06 ftersin mdbooth: hi. did you have a chance to look at ^^^^ ?
12:18:25 mdbooth ftersin: Only very briefly, I'm afraid. I'm stuck on downstream work right now. It's top of my review list, though.
12:22:46 ftersin mdbooth: ok, i understand. Probably you might review it by part. E.g. driver.py at the first, or whatever you assume is the most 'suspicious' and requires attention
12:23:14 mdbooth ftersin: That is indeed where I started :)
12:23:54 ftersin mdbooth: to let us an opportunity to discuss and to rework complex things not being in rush
12:24:06 ftersin cool
12:24:07 mdbooth Incidentally, if the driver could be confined to imagebackend.py I'd be in favour pretty much on your word that it works.
12:24:21 mdbooth IIRC it's a bit differenty in a couple of places, though.
12:25:22 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/467170
12:29:18 ftersin mdbooth: i think there are 3 kings of changes in driver.py. the 1st is trivial, i.e. the adding 'sio' into some places where 'rbd', 'lvm', etc already exist
12:30:07 ftersin the 2nd is intended to map/unmap feature. it cannot be removed but might be reworked
12:30:58 ftersin the 3rd one are some side changes, which might be separated into different patches or patch series
12:31:21 openstackgerrit Felipe Alfaro Solana proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Implements: blueprint nova-lxd-profiles https://review.openstack.org/467104
12:31:26 mdbooth ftersin: Are the side changes generally applicable, or specific to this driver?
12:33:43 ftersin both. e.g. the fix of swap device is generally applicable, but the filtering of disk_info items (to prevent use them as files) is required for SIO driver
12:34:07 ftersin however it is required for Cinder driver as well
12:34:20 ftersin it or some other solution of the problem
12:35:18 mdbooth ftersin: If you have time, I'd appreciate splitting them out, I think. I'll review without, though.
12:35:43 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: Add strict option to discover_hosts https://review.openstack.org/467218
12:38:21 ftersin mdbooth: i proposed a series, which resolve that problem separately: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:disk_info_processing
12:50:47 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Exclude deleted service records when calling hyervisor statistics https://review.openstack.org/467220
12:56:39 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: Add strict option to discover_hosts https://review.openstack.org/467218
13:00:26 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: configure trust mode for vfs https://review.openstack.org/458514
13:11:44 mriedem ahoy matey
13:11:49 mriedem (s)
13:11:57 cdent is it talk like a pirate day again?
13:12:12 asettle Yar
13:12:15 asettle it is
13:12:45 cdent since I'm in cornwall, I claim authenticity

Earlier   Later