Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-04
12:18:30 sdague yep
12:18:52 sean-k-mooney anyway it might just be a nice sideffect to get that fucntionality back
12:19:28 sean-k-mooney i used to jsut run in offline mode instad but that ment you still had to recreated the vms/netwoks/flavour ...
12:19:41 sean-k-mooney thats not hard jsut extra steps
12:21:40 alex_xu_ johnthetubaguy: sdague sfinucan appreciate if you can help this two easy api-ref changes https://review.openstack.org/461998 https://review.openstack.org/458738
12:22:20 sdague sean-k-mooney: yeh, let me know how it works. If we need some tweaks to make that use can solid for you, that would be cool
12:22:41 sdague there was so much hacktastic around getting screen to be reliable, I look forward to that code being deleted with fire
12:26:27 sshnaidm has anybody seen nova errors like: AttributeError: 'Instance' object has no attribute '_save_tags' ?
12:33:20 johnthetubaguy sshnaidm: I think I saw a bug and patch up for that somewhere
12:34:30 johnthetubaguy sshnaidm: I think gibi has this patch up: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450265/
12:34:57 johnthetubaguy dansmith: I wasn't sure about the object change in this one actually https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450265/
12:36:48 sshnaidm johnthetubaguy, thanks, so as I understand it's not critical, right?
12:37:38 johnthetubaguy sshnaidm: I believe so
12:47:07 sou Hey, I am stuck with an issue for past 2 days
12:47:15 sou I am trying a nova rebuild
12:47:20 sou and it fails all the time
12:47:44 sou with error: ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher [req-b5730d47-3c34-4949-9836-01139238f829 8a205b2aa31c4c1185a417c6e99e852c fcb05e141ede4164ab6db9ad0724a08e - - -] Exception during message handling: id
12:48:24 sou nothing else in logs
12:48:45 sou the exception is generated from /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/glanceclient/openstack/common/apiclient/base.py
12:48:52 sou line 494, in __getattr__
12:49:05 sou any one else has faced similar issue?
12:49:16 sou I am using Kilo version
12:49:43 sou compute nodes uses KVM and images are lvm
12:52:21 johnthetubaguy sou: please try #openstack, see channel topic
12:53:31 sou Thanks @johnthetubadguy
13:26:24 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for os-interface endpoint instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/459979
13:26:24 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for server-tags instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/461645
13:26:25 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Use plain routes list for server-migrations endpoint instead of stevedore https://review.openstack.org/461646
13:30:09 abhi89 johnthetubaguy: can we back port this fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460305/ to stable/ocata.. we were looking to have this change in this release in our product..
13:30:47 johnthetubaguy abhi89: I think that should be OK
13:31:07 dansmith johnthetubaguy: yes, as you said, and as convention in the code, the empty save handler is the right approach
13:33:01 abhi89 johnthetubaguy: grt.. i will cherry pick the fix to ocata..
13:33:24 gibi mriedem: hi! I could not attend on the nova meeting today, I left small notes on the agenda
13:33:32 mriedem gibi: ok thanks
13:45:34 mriedem gibi: do we need to call out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401992/ when it's approved?
13:46:54 mriedem melwitt: sdague: dansmith: looks like the use_journal=True thing was causing the cells job failures http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1580728
13:47:03 mriedem we should still get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461912 in though
13:48:44 dansmith mriedem: okay, I've yet to see my devstack patch fail with journald remoed
13:48:54 dansmith well, fail for a related reason anyway
13:49:13 abhi89 johnthetubaguy: please review cherry picked fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462561/ for stable/ocata
13:56:10 mriedem nova meeting in 4 minutes in #openstack-meeting
14:32:48 mtreinish kashyap: fwiw, I was talking about the grenade line there. It's not 100% obvious that it's there for making sure systemd isn't used on grenade
14:33:05 mtreinish I had to think it through out loud to understand the logic in that if
14:33:07 kashyap mtreinish: Noted. :-)
14:33:40 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.updateprop notification https://review.openstack.org/462576
14:34:56 nammo Hi How can I remove a RetryFilter?
14:35:12 nammo I removed it from nova.conf but it still exists
14:37:49 bauzas manjeets__: pull it out from enabled_filters
14:38:05 bauzas oops
14:38:08 bauzas nammo: ^
14:38:40 nammo bauzas: Thanks for your response
14:38:40 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Transform aggregate.update_metadata notification https://review.openstack.org/460625
14:38:52 nammo I did it but it still show up in logs
14:39:00 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: test for agg association not sharing https://review.openstack.org/461901
14:39:00 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: tests for non-shared with shared https://review.openstack.org/461899
14:39:01 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: shared resources when finding providers https://review.openstack.org/461574
14:39:01 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: test non-shared out of inventory https://review.openstack.org/461900
14:39:02 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: get providers sharing capacity https://review.openstack.org/460798
14:39:21 jaypipes dansmith: fixed that silly copy/paste error in the functional test ^^
14:39:26 jaypipes dansmith: thx for your reviews!
14:40:12 dansmith jaypipes: did you see the rest? I think I had a -1 on all of them
14:40:21 nammo bauzas: I restarted n-sch, n-cond
14:40:29 nammo Is that sufficient?
14:40:38 bauzas nammo: only n-sch
14:41:58 nammo bauzas: No it is not working for me :(
14:44:43 nammo bauzas: http://paste.openstack.org/show/608874/
14:46:51 jaypipes dansmith: I've fixed some issues. with regards to the long code comment, where do you want me to put that stuff?
14:47:17 dansmith jaypipes: I dunno, it was just an idea.. I'd like to avoid moving the actual db query code elsewhere
14:47:54 bauzas jaypipes: FWIW, I was reviewing your bottom change, but I was thinking about using Workbench
14:47:55 jaypipes dansmith: right... I moved that code into the module-level scope per your request.
14:48:11 bauzas jaypipes: because $sql
14:48:25 dansmith jaypipes: yep, I saw, and I appreciate that. I'm referring to edleafe and cdent's desire to see it moved farther away
14:48:54 jaypipes dansmith: oh. sorry, do you agree with that?
14:49:29 dansmith jaypipes: agree with what? I just said I didn't want to see that code move out, so if we need to make things smaller, maybe we should move the comments out
14:50:51 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.update_metadata notification https://review.openstack.org/460625
14:51:22 cdent I'm not wed to the idea of moving it out, is fine in the same file, but I find huge python files difficult to think about
14:51:44 jaypipes dansmith: right, and I was asking where you'd like to move the SQL comments.
14:51:57 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: test for agg association not sharing https://review.openstack.org/461901
14:51:57 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: tests for non-shared with shared https://review.openstack.org/461899
14:51:58 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: shared resources when finding providers https://review.openstack.org/461574
14:51:58 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: test non-shared out of inventory https://review.openstack.org/461900
14:52:10 dansmith jaypipes: and I said "I dunno" :P
14:52:19 dansmith jaypipes: my preference would be to not move things out of that file
14:52:30 jaypipes dansmith: ah, sorry, I missed that. :)
14:52:39 bauzas cdent: jaypipes: dansmithwhat needs to move ?
14:52:56 bauzas I'm fine with leaving ORM code as it is
14:53:09 bauzas if that's the point
14:58:04 jaypipes bauzas: the discussion is not around the ORM code but rather there is a discussion about how long the code comment with SQL is on that function.
14:58:20 bauzas well
14:58:22 bauzas okay
14:58:29 bauzas not sure it's a problme
14:58:54 bauzas when I wrote the long docstring, I also fixed the comment when I changed the calls
14:59:19 bauzas that's why I'd like to at least pdb your change for verifying the SQL query
14:59:39 mriedem won't we want the big ass sql comment for the complicated orm code?
14:59:51 mriedem as dansmith said earlier in the week, this is all fine but i won't be debugging it :)
14:59:52 bauzas it's just part of a reviewer duty /me shrugs
15:00:00 dansmith there is no question about ORM stuff AT ALL
15:00:12 dansmith it's about where to put these comments about the sql
15:00:22 bauzas tbc, I'm fine with the current situation
15:00:34 bauzas having large docstrings is good wit hme

Earlier   Later