| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-26 | |||
| 15:02:21 | bauzas | cdent: cool then | |
| 15:02:21 | jaypipes | mdbooth: eventually, there will be a bit more structure there, when nested resource providers lands this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415920/ | |
| 15:02:37 | bauzas | cdent: FWIW the gabbi tests for allocations are a bit long to read :) | |
| 15:02:42 | cdent | mdbooth: we're trying to kill off nova-side use of placement-used ovos, especially when rcp not involved | |
| 15:02:47 | jaypipes | mdbooth: but we didn't want to depend on versioned objects defined in nova/objects/resource_provider.py within the virt driver layer. | |
| 15:03:13 | jaypipes | bauzas: compared to...? | |
| 15:03:30 | bauzas | jaypipes: for knowing which allocations to delete | |
| 15:03:40 | bauzas | anyway, patch is close to be up | |
| 15:03:58 | jaypipes | bauzas: no, I mean the gabbits are hard to read, compared to what? :) | |
| 15:04:19 | cdent | bauzas: see line 51 of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-newton-leftovers | |
| 15:04:20 | bauzas | compared to API docs :) | |
| 15:04:23 | mriedem | there is a note in there that the get allocations gabbits can't sub the left side of the json path b/c of a bug | |
| 15:04:40 | mriedem | they are working on api-ref | |
| 15:04:50 | cdent | s/they/we/ | |
| 15:04:57 | cdent | as in, all of us | |
| 15:05:13 | mriedem | us vs them | |
| 15:05:15 | mriedem | duh | |
| 15:05:31 | cdent | mriedem: are you the wolf or the dog today? | |
| 15:05:41 | mriedem | i meant, they as in 'people that aren't me' | |
| 15:05:42 | mriedem | :) | |
| 15:05:46 | mriedem | b/c i'm not being helpful | |
| 15:06:43 | cdent | the docs, although not yet published, are coming together nicely and look very nice and polished | |
| 15:08:21 | cdent | given sufficient time/energy/people it would be great to decompose the gabbi files into smaller pieces, been on the looking for volunteers todo list for months | |
| 15:10:41 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in floating_ip files https://review.openstack.org/459791 | |
| 15:12:11 | efried | mordred Just to be clear, for the endpoints-from-service-catalog stuff, you're suggesting changes in keystoneauth1 itself? | |
| 15:12:41 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: hi jay yes im familar with what at&t want to do we were talking about this at the PTG | |
| 15:12:47 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in migrations.py https://review.openstack.org/459727 | |
| 15:13:29 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: its been a while since i reviewd the code changes though so i need to see how its shaping up and what the apis will look like. | |
| 15:16:00 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: will you be in Boston? | |
| 15:16:19 | sean-k-mooney | i was not planning to be if i had a strong reason to go i could | |
| 15:16:56 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: heh, you know it's in <2 weeks right? :) | |
| 15:17:37 | sean-k-mooney | yep i know i do have a ticket for said event but others are going form my team just not me | |
| 15:18:04 | sean-k-mooney | i was not sure how much design was going to happen at the fourm now with the PTG | |
| 15:18:17 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova master: Delete inventory has its own method DELETE https://review.openstack.org/460147 | |
| 15:18:32 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: certainly less than the PTG. but if you were going to be there, I would propose meeting in person. | |
| 15:18:45 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: not a big deal though. we can always do a hangout. | |
| 15:18:57 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/POC Implement new attach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 15:20:06 | openstackgerrit | Kaitlin Farr proposed openstack/nova master: Parse algorithm from cipher for ephemeral disk encryption https://review.openstack.org/446072 | |
| 15:20:35 | sean-k-mooney | yep it would have been good to sync on things but ya im always up for a hangout's chat too | |
| 15:21:37 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: AT&T originally were proposing this as a nova change and i redirected it to neutron at the ptg. | |
| 15:22:03 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: k | |
| 15:22:29 | mordred | efried: I am - I think we should add a method to keystoneauth which registers options needed by "adapters" (which is keystoneauth term for a session mounted on a service endpoint) | |
| 15:22:54 | mordred | efried: so basically the parameters you need to create an adapter are the same parameters you need to find an endpoint from the service catalog | |
| 15:23:30 | mordred | and if we add them there, then we can just re-use that method ot register the right opts in all the places we want to let nova users put in all of the different filters | |
| 15:23:39 | mordred | (similar to how we use register_session_opts now) | |
| 15:24:04 | efried | mordred I dig it. Can you point me to something in the keystone source that'll give me a hint as to how an "adapter" differs from a "session" or an "auth"? | |
| 15:24:17 | mriedem | swebster: see my comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453938/2/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py after the fact - can you push a small change to update that code comment block for the migration = None case? | |
| 15:24:26 | mordred | one could also make the argument that an load_adapter_from_opts would be a nice equivilent method ot keystoneauth that we could use in the places we want just a plain keystoneuath REST interface | |
| 15:24:28 | openstackgerrit | Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Transform instance.live_migration_rollback notification https://review.openstack.org/402124 | |
| 15:24:33 | mordred | efried: absolutely! one sec ... | |
| 15:25:09 | swebster | mriedem: no problem, will do | |
| 15:25:37 | mordred | efried: so - if you start from here: https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/master/keystoneauth1/loading/__init__.py#L31-L32 | |
| 15:25:46 | efried | mordred And next question: Where do I propose changes? review.openstack.org via https://git.openstack.org/openstack/keystoneauth ? | |
| 15:26:13 | efried | mordred Yuh, found that, and saw how it was being used by other groups (cinder, ironic). | |
| 15:26:18 | mordred | efried: you can see this: https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/master/keystoneauth1/loading/session.py | |
| 15:26:37 | mordred | so I believe what would be wanted is a similar keystoneauth1/loading/adapter.py | |
| 15:27:25 | mordred | the actual adapter code is here: https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/master/keystoneauth1/adapter.py - which lists the different adapter constructor params - I'm not sure all of those need to be conf options though | |
| 15:28:16 | mordred | efried: I'd say for your purposes, https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/master/keystoneauth1/adapter.py#L32-L37 are the ones that want conf options | |
| 15:28:56 | efried | mordred Except service_name, which people thought was useless? | |
| 15:29:07 | mordred | https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/master/keystoneauth1/adapter.py#L38 is useful once you're actually calling get_endpoint - but I think that's a different nova-level thing not a conf option | |
| 15:29:43 | mordred | efried: yes - I do wish service_name would diaf, but I think also johnthetubaguy made a good point mentioning it - just because I don't like it doesn't mean that people out there may not have used it for something | |
| 15:30:18 | mordred | efried: for instance, in the infra account for rackspace public cloud, there actually used to be 2 entries for "compute" - because of history with pre-openstack rackspace | |
| 15:30:25 | mordred | and we had to use service_name to get it to pick the right one | |
| 15:30:44 | mordred | so if we're adding the conf_options to keystoneauth, we might as well be complete :) | |
| 15:30:59 | efried | mordred Fair enough. | |
| 15:31:31 | efried | mordred At a glance here, I would need to have the union of [session opts] with these adapter opts, right? | |
| 15:31:36 | openstackgerrit | Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Transform instance.live_migration_rollback notification https://review.openstack.org/402124 | |
| 15:31:36 | mordred | efried: fwiw, I recently wrote a spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459405/ - which explains this entire thing in excruciating detail | |
| 15:31:51 | efried | ooo | |
| 15:31:54 | mordred | in case you've ever wanted to learn _WAY_ more about what's going on here than any human should know | |
| 15:31:58 | efried | That'll be helpful. | |
| 15:32:09 | cdent | "explains" | |
| 15:32:34 | mordred | efried: yah - each service grouping needs the session opts and the adapter opts in order to fully desscribe how to connect to a service | |
| 15:32:56 | mordred | efried: the sesion opts obvs go to the Session, and then the adapter opts are how the service endpoint is found | |
| 15:32:59 | mordred | cdent: :) | |
| 15:33:09 | mordred | cdent: ooh! you made reviews for me - I'm excited | |
| 15:33:22 | cdent | mordred: i'm afraid they are disappointingly short | |
| 15:34:01 | swebster | mriedem: do you recommend updating that existing review, or should I start a new branch/review for the comment change? Since the original change already got merged | |
| 15:34:04 | efried | mordred I believe I understand. This is just what I was looking for. Ima have questions for you later about os-client-config (once you get out of cdent-land) | |
| 15:34:24 | cdent | Yay! I have a land, how do I get there? | |
| 15:35:03 | efried | cdent Take the red pill | |
| 15:35:39 | mriedem | swebster: the existing review is merged | |
| 15:35:46 | mriedem | so it has to be new | |
| 15:35:51 | jbernard | mriedem: im not sure either | |
| 15:35:59 | swebster | mriedem: thx | |
| 15:36:02 | mriedem | jbernard: i pushed a rev of the d-g change with tracing | |
| 15:36:04 | jbernard | mriedem: ahh, you added a recheck, thanks | |
| 15:36:28 | jbernard | mriedem: something unrelated appears to have merged, the graph is not looking good this morning | |
| 15:37:48 | mordred | efried: cool - let's definitely chat later about the occ things - I'll ping when I'm done with the next round of updates on this spec | |
| 15:38:08 | efried | mordred Roger wilco, and thanks. | |
| 15:38:16 | mordred | cdent: one of your feedbacks brings up a thing that morgan had mentioned too and I came up with a good idea for making it better - so while short, they are helpful! | |
| 15:38:54 | jbernard | mriedem: http://logs.openstack.org/32/459832/1/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-devstack-plugin-ceph-ubuntu-xenial/85d7f13/console.html#_2017-04-26_14_11_03_609997 | |
| 15:39:02 | jbernard | mriedem: looks like maybe it's being skipped over | |
| 15:39:24 | mriedem | artom: why not also setting capabilities for vmware and ironic drivers in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415520/29 ? | |
| 15:40:05 | efried | Is it a done thing to refer to a nova blueprint from another project? (For these keystoneauth changes, I would be referring to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-service-catalog-for-endpoints, which is listed under project nova) | |
| 15:40:21 | efried | Would the blueprint have to be tagged to be registered under keystone as well, and approved there? | |
| 15:40:23 | mriedem | jbernard: oh | |
| 15:40:24 | mriedem | {plugin-repo} | |
| 15:40:27 | mriedem | rather than ${plugin-repo} | |
| 15:40:53 | artom | mriedem, err, whoops. Not sure why that happened | |