| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-19 | |||
| 16:21:07 | dansmith | bauzas: I don't get that reference, but.. probably? | |
| 16:21:18 | rfolco | cdent, that helped. Thanks. | |
| 16:21:42 | melwitt | dansmith: you don't know ... harry potter?? | |
| 16:21:48 | cdent | rfolco: add me to the review(s) when stuff's ready please, so I can be sure to look at them and also to add them to the weekly email | |
| 16:21:55 | dansmith | melwitt: never seen it | |
| 16:22:01 | melwitt | omg | |
| 16:22:14 | bauzas | melwitt: seriously, he doesn't loose a lot | |
| 16:22:17 | dansmith | melwitt: well, I watched five minutes of it, and couldn't handle it | |
| 16:22:35 | dansmith | LOTR and harry potter, I just can't stomach | |
| 16:22:49 | bauzas | dansmith: dammit, the platform 9 3/4 was shown at 10 mins after the beginning | |
| 16:22:58 | dansmith | oh well :) | |
| 16:24:10 | bauzas | either way, I have to change my glasses this week | |
| 16:24:23 | bauzas | so probably I'll review better | |
| 16:25:56 | dansmith | bauzas: in my defense, the tests did add a cell, but I neglected to create the instance in the new cell, so .. I intended to have coverage to prove I was doing the right thing, I just failed.. twice | |
| 16:35:52 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Mock timeout in test__get_node_console_with_reset_wait_timeout https://review.openstack.org/458161 | |
| 16:37:32 | mriedem | dansmith: is this for the server groups thing? | |
| 16:37:41 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 16:38:13 | mriedem | could just write a functional test instead, | |
| 16:38:21 | mriedem | i'm finding that's easier with some of the api driven stuff and multi-cell | |
| 16:38:43 | dansmith | mriedem: this one is basically functional.. uses the actual db | |
| 16:38:57 | dansmith | mriedem: it didn't catch it because I made the same mistake in the test as the code | |
| 16:45:10 | melwitt | mriedem: I wonder if there's a bug in the backoff looping timer, it doesn't make sense that it wouldn't time out at all | |
| 16:45:34 | melwitt | it's supposed to end early if the backoff would put it over the specified timeout | |
| 16:46:14 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make server groups api aware of multiple cells for membership https://review.openstack.org/457338 | |
| 16:46:15 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up ClientRouter debt https://review.openstack.org/444487 | |
| 16:46:15 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Sort CellMappingList.get_all() for safety https://review.openstack.org/443174 | |
| 16:46:18 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add workaround to disable group policy check upcall https://review.openstack.org/442736 | |
| 16:46:21 | mriedem | melwitt: i didn't dig into how the jitter stuff works in there | |
| 16:46:41 | melwitt | yeah. I'm looking at it out of curiosity | |
| 16:46:50 | mriedem | melwitt: i figured maybe there was a bug in the fake stub method logic | |
| 16:47:00 | mriedem | but didn't dig into it | |
| 16:47:06 | melwitt | hm, yeah | |
| 16:47:32 | melwitt | I was thinking we shouldn't be doing real timeouts anyway, but it doesn't make sense that it wouldn't time out that way too | |
| 16:50:24 | openstackgerrit | Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova master: Implement ScaleIO image backend https://review.openstack.org/407440 | |
| 16:53:50 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Fix typo in deprecate-os-hosts spec https://review.openstack.org/458165 | |
| 17:13:45 | dansmith | gdi py35 | |
| 17:41:16 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate os-hosts API https://review.openstack.org/456504 | |
| 17:41:29 | mriedem | ^ is doctastic | |
| 17:54:42 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/458185 | |
| 17:56:29 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-vif master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/451049 | |
| 18:12:54 | openstackgerrit | Steve Noyes proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cinder V3 Detach calls https://review.openstack.org/438750 | |
| 18:19:19 | dansmith | I see melwitt pushed up the revised quotapalooza | |
| 18:19:44 | dansmith | I'm glad, but also sad, 'cause now we have to review it | |
| 18:21:06 | mriedem | i think my afternoon just got busy with something else... | |
| 18:22:44 | mriedem | do we want/need to get the placement usages API stuff in first? | |
| 18:22:49 | mriedem | before counting quotas? | |
| 18:23:05 | dansmith | I think she's got it so it can count inefficiently without placement | |
| 18:23:06 | dansmith | iirc | |
| 18:23:24 | mriedem | alright | |
| 18:23:25 | dansmith | we really can't miss landing this this cycle, so whatever makes the most sense time-wise I guess | |
| 18:23:29 | mriedem | i wanted something easier to review | |
| 18:23:40 | melwitt | sorry peeps | |
| 18:23:41 | mriedem | oh we can miss it | |
| 18:23:48 | mriedem | we can miss it real good | |
| 18:28:37 | hypothermic_cat | lyarwood: mriedem: johnthetubaguy: this one for the new detach flow is ready for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438750/ | |
| 18:28:45 | hypothermic_cat | I will add it to the etherpad too | |
| 18:29:25 | mriedem | ok | |
| 18:29:46 | mriedem | hypothermic_cat: doesn't the commit message need updating? | |
| 18:31:30 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: bah, yes, that should be too :) | |
| 18:31:42 | mriedem | let me go through the rest first | |
| 18:31:54 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: or well, actually I updated it | |
| 18:32:07 | mriedem | "for each case of terminate_connection" is wrong | |
| 18:32:45 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: but I can remove the "overview" part from it as it seems to be confusing | |
| 18:33:14 | mriedem | yeah, just don't change anything yet | |
| 18:39:17 | mriedem | hypothermic_cat: there you go, comments inline | |
| 18:41:35 | mriedem | hypothermic_cat: i'm confused about the changes, are they not in a series? | |
| 18:42:14 | mriedem | you're going to have conflicts if those aren't done in a series | |
| 18:42:19 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: I tried not to have a like 8 patches long series to be able to get more hands on the code, etc | |
| 18:42:25 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: that's a pain to maintain | |
| 18:42:31 | mriedem | conflicts aren't fun either | |
| 18:42:48 | hypothermic_cat | these are small changes there won't be that much conflict | |
| 18:42:59 | hypothermic_cat | I have a few that have a common base | |
| 18:43:12 | mriedem | ok i was thinking more about the crud operations in nova/volume/cinder.py | |
| 18:43:25 | mriedem | those are common and should be at the bottom of the series | |
| 18:43:36 | hypothermic_cat | if we can get the base in then there's at least two IIRC that can be independent from the rest for instance | |
| 18:44:00 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: those are only in this base detach patch right now | |
| 18:44:31 | mriedem | ok i asked for the attachment_update one to be split out of that change | |
| 18:44:34 | mriedem | until it's used | |
| 18:44:36 | hypothermic_cat | mriedem: I should've marked the other as WIP, will do that a bit later | |
| 18:44:40 | mriedem | which is why i figured things were in a series | |
| 18:45:18 | hypothermic_cat | hmm, I think we don't even use that right now, so I might simply need to delete it | |
| 18:45:29 | hypothermic_cat | as we have delete and create for things like swap | |
| 20:18:25 | openstackgerrit | Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use config types to parse XML for instance disks https://review.openstack.org/410667 | |
| 20:18:26 | openstackgerrit | Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use config types to parse XML for root disk https://review.openstack.org/411941 | |
| 20:18:26 | openstackgerrit | Feodor Tersin proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add missing tests for utils.find_disk https://review.openstack.org/414750 | |
| 20:18:43 | jaypipes | mriedem, dansmith: any chance either of you would be able to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448282/ and series? :) | |
| 20:19:45 | dansmith | jaypipes: like you're looking for odds or what? | |
| 20:19:49 | dansmith | I'd say about 33% | |
| 20:20:18 | jaypipes | dansmith: fair enough :) | |
| 20:21:55 | mriedem | jaypipes: once i get my state of the union for pike-1 email done | |
| 20:22:14 | jaypipes | cheers | |
| 20:28:31 | dansmith | jaypipes: say yes to my comment on the bottom patch and I will approve | |
| 20:29:52 | jaypipes | dansmith: you mean like this? https://github.com/openstack/os-traits/blob/master/os_traits/__init__.py#L27 | |
| 20:30:18 | dansmith | jaypipes: but accessible from the command line | |
| 20:30:36 | jaypipes | dansmith: sure I can add that. | |
| 20:30:37 | dansmith | maybe just make this do it: "python -mos_traits" | |
| 20:31:00 | jaypipes | dansmith: yep, I can add a patch that does that. | |
| 20:31:30 | dansmith | jaypipes: ack, +W | |
| 20:31:34 | jaypipes | cheers | |
| 20:32:55 | openstackgerrit | Steve Noyes proposed openstack/nova master: Update detach to use V3 Cinder API https://review.openstack.org/438750 | |