| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-10 | |||
| 21:20:49 | jroll | mriedem: so ironic wants to do a thing where we can tag ironic hosts with neutron networks, and make sure nova schedules instances to the hosts with matching networks. seems like nova's routed networks thing does that, but I don't understand what I would need to change to make that work for ironic. can you help with that or should I wait to bug johnthetubaguy ? | |
| 21:22:21 | mriedem | jroll: have you read through carl_baldwin's nova spec about working routed networks support into nova? | |
| 21:23:03 | mriedem | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/implemented/neutron-routed-networks.html | |
| 21:23:07 | jroll | mriedem: yeah, is it all just host aggregate based? | |
| 21:23:19 | mriedem | yeah basically | |
| 21:23:34 | jroll | hrm | |
| 21:23:40 | mriedem | neutron creates a resource provider for the network allocation pool | |
| 21:23:48 | mriedem | that's tied to a host aggregate | |
| 21:24:05 | mriedem | honestly i'd have to go back and read the spec too, it's been since newton | |
| 21:24:11 | jroll | I can only aggregate hosts, right, not nodes? | |
| 21:24:30 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 21:24:34 | mriedem | well, i think so | |
| 21:24:44 | jroll | ya, sounds right | |
| 21:24:58 | mriedem | we don't distinguish between hosts and nodes in the api | |
| 21:25:02 | jroll | yeah | |
| 21:26:02 | jroll | mriedem: I was just going through our priorities and making sure we had BPs and such approved for everything, this was the only one that did not. might have something coming this week, I guess, if they had ideas | |
| 21:26:18 | mriedem | you have 3 days | |
| 21:26:33 | jroll | exactly :P | |
| 21:26:35 | mriedem | and then the boy dies | |
| 21:26:41 | mriedem | oops, did i say that out loud? | |
| 21:26:45 | jroll | good, I didn't want him anyway | |
| 21:38:26 | mriedem | i guess we should care about https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/prep-for-network-aware-scheduling-pike,n,z at some point | |
| 21:38:29 | mriedem | given we didn't at all for ocata | |
| 21:41:40 | cdent | so many things | |
| 21:45:53 | mriedem | yeah too many things | |
| 21:53:20 | mtreinish | mriedem: +A | |
| 21:55:48 | mriedem | hells yes! | |
| 22:11:35 | mriedem | sdague: johnthetubaguy: alex_xu: for your tomorrow, jaypipes left some good comments in the spec to deprecate os-virtual-interfaces https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455023/ - mainly around trimming the fat on the existing response, which johnthetubaguy had also touched on back in newton or ocata when we talked about this | |
| 22:11:50 | mriedem | i'm just wondering how slim we want to get | |
| 22:23:28 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend spec for placement project/user association https://review.openstack.org/454352 | |
| 22:28:05 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend spec for placement project/user association https://review.openstack.org/454352 | |
| 22:28:26 | mriedem | rpodolyaka_afk: are you owning this spec for pavel now? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381912/ | |
| 22:30:37 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove aggregate uuid generation on load from DB https://review.openstack.org/448579 | |
| 22:33:53 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: 2.43: Remove Location header from createImage and createBackup responses https://review.openstack.org/455443 | |
| 22:48:52 | dtp | these shadow tables - do they store the state of records at every change, or only the final state of the record when it is deleted from its main table? | |
| 22:58:33 | mriedem | dtp: they are used during archive | |
| 22:58:43 | mriedem | the "deleted" records are moved from the main tables to the shadow tables | |
| 22:58:49 | mriedem | during nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows | |
| 22:58:58 | mriedem | so yeah final state | |
| 22:59:06 | dtp | cool, thanks | |
| 23:00:17 | mriedem | dtp: btw, when we get to the api part of that uuid in api bp, i think i'll let you do the os-services api which should be much more straightforward than the os-hypervisors api changes | |
| 23:00:19 | mriedem | i'll take the latter | |
| 23:00:30 | mriedem | since it's going to be more than just the uuid stuff in that one, it's basically a re-write | |
| 23:00:45 | dtp | ok | |
| 23:01:27 | dtp | do you want shadow_services.uuid indexed? | |
| 23:02:18 | mriedem | no | |
| 23:02:24 | mriedem | we don't query anything out of the shadow tables | |
| 23:02:30 | mriedem | so don't care about constraints or indexes there | |
| 23:16:10 | dtp | mriedem are you still tracking who's coming to boston? | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-11 | |||
| 00:13:24 | openstackgerrit | Dan Peschman proposed openstack/nova master: Add uuid to Service model https://review.openstack.org/453025 | |
| 02:06:29 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Deprecate multinic proxy API https://review.openstack.org/384261 | |
| 02:06:45 | alex_xu | mriedem: ^ updated | |
| 02:12:26 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Add Traits API to placement service https://review.openstack.org/376200 | |
| 02:40:40 | openstackgerrit | Spencer Yu proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Nova client should retry with Retry-After value https://review.openstack.org/447766 | |
| 03:18:43 | mriedem | alex_xu: thanks, a couple of small things were missed | |
| 03:18:51 | mriedem | but overall should be easy to fix and then i'm +2 | |
| 03:20:19 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix api-ref for create servers response https://review.openstack.org/451673 | |
| 03:25:34 | mriedem | tommylikehu: re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453272/3/specs/pike/approved/nova-support-attached-volume-extend.rst@26 nova does not yet support volume multiattach upstream | |
| 03:25:38 | mriedem | so a VM is correct there | |
| 03:27:13 | tommylikehu | mriedem: thanks | |
| 03:39:06 | openstackgerrit | Bob Ball proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: device tagging https://review.openstack.org/333781 | |
| 03:41:04 | mriedem | tommylikehu: mgagne: comments inline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453272/3 | |
| 03:55:45 | tommylikehu | mriedem: great, thanks! | |
| 04:35:32 | openstackgerrit | Mathieu Gagné proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova support for attached volume extend https://review.openstack.org/453272 | |
| 05:10:35 | openstackgerrit | Mathieu Gagné proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova support for attached volume extend https://review.openstack.org/453272 | |
| 05:42:24 | openstackgerrit | Mathieu Gagné proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova support for attached volume extend https://review.openstack.org/453272 | |
| 05:51:31 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Deprecate multinic proxy API https://review.openstack.org/384261 | |
| 06:07:52 | openstackgerrit | Lei Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add sync traits command for placement https://review.openstack.org/450125 | |
| 06:16:13 | nirendra | Hi, Nova placement API checks for max_units which is local_gb for the host. This makes allocation_ratio useless. So if I'm trying to create a VM with 80GB root disk and disk_allocation_ratio as 100, it fails for a host which does not have 80GB local storage | |
| 06:16:26 | nirendra | Is this a known bug? I couldn't find one in Launchpad | |
| 07:16:20 | openstackgerrit | YuYang proposed openstack/nova master: VMware:fix get VM root device conditional verify https://review.openstack.org/454441 | |
| 07:20:26 | openstackgerrit | YuYang proposed openstack/nova master: VMware:fix get VM root device conditional verify https://review.openstack.org/454441 | |
| 07:49:58 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Parameter verification for servers-actions (1/4) https://review.openstack.org/455563 | |
| 07:52:13 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Fix HTTP 500 raised for getColsolelog for stopped instance https://review.openstack.org/455183 | |
| 07:55:49 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Parameter verification for servers-actions (2/4) https://review.openstack.org/455568 | |
| 08:00:30 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Parameter verification for servers-actions (3/4) https://review.openstack.org/455570 | |
| 08:04:57 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Parameter verification for servers-actions (4/4) https://review.openstack.org/455573 | |
| 09:03:15 | d9k | when instance is destroyed neutron deletes ipsets while nova is modifying iptables and https://ptpb.pw/16S8 happens, acquiring neutron-ipset lock in (network/linux_net.py) IptablesManager._apply seems to fix the problem | |
| 09:15:19 | jsheeren | hi, question: is it possible to limit image A to be only able to use flavor X and Y, image B only flavor Z? | |
| 09:28:42 | prabhuraj | Hi team, Someone could review the following changes : | |
| 09:28:48 | prabhuraj | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397471/ | |
| 09:29:05 | prabhuraj | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397459/ | |
| 09:40:10 | BobBall | Howdy - Trying to use device tagging I'm getting an "Invalid input for field/attribute networks" - nova cli says I need to use ",tag=<value>" but schema validation fails if I add it. Openstack cli doesn't seem to support tags (According to help text anyway)... | |
| 09:40:19 | BobBall | Can someone remind me how to use tagging? | |
| 09:41:45 | johnthetubaguy | openstack cli doesn't support microversions yet | |
| 09:41:53 | johnthetubaguy | afaik | |
| 09:42:09 | johnthetubaguy | did you try with nova client? | |
| 09:42:21 | BobBall | Yes - that's what failed the schema validation when running it | |
| 09:44:38 | BobBall | http://paste.openstack.org/show/606121/ - I'm clearly using the wrong syntax | |
| 09:45:08 | BobBall | (or device tagging is broken...) | |
| 09:49:15 | abhi89 | johnthetubaguy: can you please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455118/2 | |
| 09:58:13 | johnthetubaguy | BobBall: that doesn't seem good | |
| 09:58:29 | BobBall | OK - so the nova client does not now support nova microversion 2.42 - for some reason 7.1.0 was installed | |
| 09:59:00 | BobBall | it's just weird that novaclient 7.1.0 lists tag in the help text but doesn't support the microversion which introduced the API | |
| 09:59:04 | johnthetubaguy | BobBall: try do the full debug and see what version is requested | |
| 09:59:10 | johnthetubaguy | yeah, thats... inconsistent | |
| 09:59:25 | johnthetubaguy | probably only got some of the patches landed | |
| 09:59:33 | BobBall | nova client is requesting 2.41 - which doesn't support tagging... *jumps with joy* | |
| 09:59:54 | johnthetubaguy | BobBall: did you try explicitly request the new version, it might be we couldn't raise the maximum at that point | |
| 10:00:14 | BobBall | Yes - python-novaclient says it's not supported. | |