Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-24
15:38:19 mriedem anthonyper: some of that is old news
15:38:22 mriedem anthonyper: see d571e03b5b67a401e7774988a84df3bef16273ad
15:38:28 mriedem https://github.com/openstack/tempest/commit/d571e03b5b67a401e7774988a84df3bef16273ad
15:38:38 mriedem tempest doesn't hardcode vda anymore in test_volume_boot_pattern
15:39:31 anthonyper mriedem: Thanks, I'll tests that and change the patch.
15:40:31 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix live-migrate usage of RequestSpec https://review.openstack.org/449690
15:41:35 openstackgerrit Anthony PERARD proposed openstack/nova master: Add exclusion list for tempest for a libvirt+xen job https://review.openstack.org/449687
15:43:18 mriedem johnthetubaguy: just fyi i added L137 in here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-TC-vm-baremetal-platform
15:43:38 johnthetubaguy mriedem: ah, cool
15:52:50 cdent alex_xu: I assume you're not around anymore today, but wanted to check before I do some rebasing of our combined stacks of code
15:54:57 mriedem johnthetubaguy: leakypipes: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/28
15:55:04 mriedem that might need to be two separate sessions
15:55:10 mriedem jgriffith: ildikov: Kevin_Zheng: ^
15:56:26 sdague johnthetubaguy: ok, I looked again at the new spec, I still thing you want to take it back even one step further. Let me throw a patch on top of it with an idea of tone.
15:56:55 ildikov mriedem: thanks
15:57:14 mriedem johnthetubaguy: sdague: since you guys are going to be decided forum sessions, let me know if i should split http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/28 into 2 sessions
15:57:19 mriedem *deciding
15:57:29 mriedem if they are 40 minute blocks, 20 minutes per topic is not enough
15:57:44 ildikov mriedem: the plan is 40 minutes long sessions
15:57:55 ildikov mriedem: I would say let's split that to two
15:58:01 sdague mriedem: yeh, I'd suggest splitting
15:58:09 mriedem ok
15:58:29 ildikov mriedem: johnthetubaguy: jgriffith: I got pointed to a multi-attach related forum session proposal: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/17
15:58:58 mriedem ildikov: yeah i already commented on it
15:59:00 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I don't get a vote in that, its some other sub team of the TC looking at that, I believe
15:59:36 ildikov mriedem: thanks
16:00:00 johnthetubaguy but yeah, better to split to start, and combine later if needed, I guess
16:00:28 leakypipes mriedem: agreed.
16:00:55 mriedem ok done http://forumtopics.openstack.org/
16:02:06 mriedem huh, apparently if you rename it's a new topic
16:02:10 mriedem and you can't delete a topic
16:02:12 mriedem because now i have 3
16:02:29 mriedem EmilienM: ttx: do you know how to delete http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/28 ?
16:02:54 EmilienM mriedem: Edit and Delete
16:03:08 mriedem thanks
16:03:08 mriedem ah nice
16:03:48 mriedem leakypipes: ah i see you created http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/26 so that probably covers what i was going to submit
16:03:51 leakypipes cdent: I'm sorry, I still don't understand what you're asking for.
16:04:08 leakypipes mriedem: ya
16:04:30 mriedem we probably need a separate topic for claims in the scheduler though, i'm not sure yet
16:04:40 mriedem but we didn't talk about it at the ptg
16:04:49 leakypipes mriedem: ++
16:05:07 cdent leakypipes: maybe sean-k-mooney can take a stab at describing it? otherwise, if you're still curious I'll try a very quick spike at it after I rebase some stuff to fix merge conflicts after that float fix
16:05:33 leakypipes cdent: well, lemme try one more thing and push it.
16:06:02 cdent k
16:07:50 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/nova master: Read Neutron port 'binding_profile' during boot https://review.openstack.org/449257
16:09:13 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Set 'size' during image create with FakeImageService https://review.openstack.org/449702
16:09:13 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for local delete with an attached volume https://review.openstack.org/449334
16:09:43 mriedem sdague: ^ you'd probably appreciate that bottom change
16:11:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Regression test for local delete with an attached volume https://review.openstack.org/449334
16:11:38 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Set 'size' during image create with FakeImageService https://review.openstack.org/449702
16:13:05 mriedem superdan: pep8 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449640/
16:13:31 superdan mriedem: yeah I have it fixed, as waiting for the run to finish before I pushed it up again
16:13:34 superdan and was on a call
16:13:38 mriedem ok
16:13:39 sdague johnthetubaguy: while I'm doing that, you want to hit this easy thing - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448019/
16:13:40 superdan here
16:13:47 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove legacy regeneration of RequestSpec in MigrationTask https://review.openstack.org/449640
16:15:05 johnthetubaguy sdague: got my head in the policy spec still, adding that to the queue
16:17:58 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Allow PUT and POST without bodies https://review.openstack.org/447625
16:17:59 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Add Traits API to placement service https://review.openstack.org/376200
16:17:59 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Enable attach traits to ResourceProvider https://review.openstack.org/376201
16:18:01 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Add Trait and TraitList objects https://review.openstack.org/376199
16:19:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove dead code https://review.openstack.org/449708
16:30:22 openstackgerrit Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in tenant_networks.py https://review.openstack.org/449714
16:34:08 cdent leakypipes: while waiting for some tests to run I made a hack to do demo what I was thinking of. it can probably cleaned up monstrously, but shows the idea: https://github.com/cdent/pony
16:35:13 leakypipes cdent: lol, very similar to what I put together locally.
16:35:29 cdent leakypipes: ah, good, so we are understanding one another then?
16:36:06 leakypipes cdent: would seem so.\
16:36:15 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/446674
16:36:24 cdent praise be or something
16:40:25 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova-specs master: New intro https://review.openstack.org/449722
16:40:33 sdague johnthetubaguy: what about something like that?
16:42:14 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Idempotent PUT /resource_classes/{name} https://review.openstack.org/448791
16:46:07 johnthetubaguy sdague: looking
16:48:41 johnthetubaguy sdague: thanks I will roll that into the patch I have cooking at the moment
17:02:35 tojuvone johnthetubaguy, Hi I had other things going like floorball. Looks that somehow I did not receive your comments in the patch.
17:04:27 johnthetubaguy tojuvone: added a follow on patch, but I don't really like my ideas in there now, after catch up with sdague on the direction he was suggesting before
17:05:31 tojuvone johnthetubaguy, ok, thanks
17:06:58 openstackgerrit Anthony PERARD proposed openstack/nova master: Add exclusion list for tempest for a libvirt+xen job https://review.openstack.org/449687
17:22:22 openstackgerrit Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in simple_tenant_usage.py https://review.openstack.org/449742
17:27:57 EmilienM can we nova ephemeral disk using rbd backend be encrypted with key manager like Barbican? I know it's doable with LVM but not sure about rbd
17:29:22 cdent BobBall_: is this still a thing: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/394857/
17:39:36 tojuvone johnthetubaguy, sdague, bauwser Thanks and sorry if wasted your time around the host maintenance.
17:41:15 cfriesen when running "openstack server migrate" will that do a cold migration? If so, is there any way to do a live migration without specifying the destination compute node?
17:41:26 leakypipes cdent, figleaf, alex_xu, sean-k-mooney: OK, try this on for size: https://review.openstack.org/448282 and https://review.openstack.org/448283
17:41:35 sdague tojuvone: I mostly don't want to waste your time iterating here if we're not going to do it
17:41:51 sdague and I feel like we said we weren't going to do this a while ago
17:43:12 tojuvone sdague, Yes, agree
17:44:39 johnthetubaguy cfriesen: do you try passing host=None or null? it might be an openstack client limitation (https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=live-migrate-server-os-migratelive-action-detail#live-migrate-server-os-migratelive-action)
17:46:29 johnthetubaguy tojuvone: sdague: I agree it probably makes sense for OpenStack to support that use case, its just the preferred implementation/architecture has 99% or 100% of the code changes outside of Nova.
17:46:35 tojuvone sdague, good you stop it there again and can focus doing just what talked already back in Austin without wasting anybody time on something more
17:47:07 johnthetubaguy what we said in austin was?
17:48:07 tojuvone Well, if I recall was around to have something as simple as linking
17:48:48 openstackgerrit Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to nova/policies/shelve.py https://review.openstack.org/449763
17:49:14 sean-k-mooney leakypipes: that looks really good to me.
17:49:23 tojuvone Everytim I just touched the review it went bigger and bigger
17:49:43 leakypipes sean-k-mooney: that's more in-line to what you were envisioning?
17:49:56 sean-k-mooney leakypipes: ya it is
17:50:41 johnthetubaguy tojuvone: right, I am not sure the link is useful enough by its-self, disabled host probably is enough for the state in Nova.

Earlier   Later