| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-03-21 | |||
| 11:10:34 | alex_xu | sdague: checking | |
| 11:11:19 | cdent | alex_xu: the reason, in that case, that you didn't get 500 error that the original bug fixed is because when you use -d with curl, it automatically sends a content-type header and the error that was being protected against was when there was no content-type header. do you think there's something wrong with the new patch? | |
| 11:11:58 | sfinucan | sdague: Two small indentation things. Otherwise TrivialFix | |
| 11:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: update i18n guide for nova https://review.openstack.org/447528 | |
| 11:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: remove log translation from nova.api.metadata https://review.openstack.org/447466 | |
| 11:16:42 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in agents.py https://review.openstack.org/445208 | |
| 11:17:05 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in aggregates.py https://review.openstack.org/445230 | |
| 11:17:07 | openstackgerrit | Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: PoC: Pick PCI devices with unique tags https://review.openstack.org/448008 | |
| 11:19:18 | alex_xu | sfinucan: nothing i found from me, you can +w directly as you mention it is trivialfix | |
| 11:20:09 | sfinucan | alex_xu, sdague: Sure. Done. | |
| 11:20:33 | alex_xu | cdent: i didn't finish the review yet, just want to figure why those code are there first | |
| 11:20:47 | Dinesh_Bhor | sfinucan: Hi, I just rebased the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445782/ could you please take a look at it? | |
| 11:26:37 | EmilienM | dansmith, jaypipes: good morning! here are the new logs with more debug: http://logs.openstack.org/22/447522/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/7563947/logs/undercloud/var/log/ (using https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447520/) | |
| 11:42:14 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: delete more i18n log markers https://review.openstack.org/448019 | |
| 11:45:42 | openstackgerrit | Shunli Zhou proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox from unit/cells/test_cells_messaging.py https://review.openstack.org/448021 | |
| 12:10:20 | openstackgerrit | Radoslav Gerganov proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: add support for different firmwares https://review.openstack.org/448034 | |
| 12:19:43 | alex_xu | cdent: just done the review, more comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447625/ | |
| 12:20:02 | cdent | thanks alex_xu will look in a second | |
| 12:20:30 | alex_xu | cdent: thanks | |
| 12:28:52 | jaypipes | EmilienM: in meeting hell for 2.5 hours. will try to look into that ASAP. | |
| 12:50:48 | jroll | VCPU 'min_unit': 4 | |
| 12:50:57 | jroll | and the flavor does not have 4 | |
| 12:51:03 | jroll | that would exclude that RP, right? | |
| 12:52:32 | cdent | jroll: if flavor wants 2, it would not land on the rp with min_unit of 4 | |
| 12:52:39 | jroll | nod | |
| 12:52:45 | jroll | joy! | |
| 12:53:39 | jroll | so it seems we want to give baremetal resources a lower min_unit, but still create allocations for all of the resources on that baremetal machine | |
| 12:53:43 | jroll | (to get the old behavior) | |
| 12:56:10 | cdent | jroll: I thought you didn't want that kind of under subscription, but I guess that's not the case? | |
| 12:57:01 | jroll | cdent: we've always left the user a choice, with the "exact" scheduler filters | |
| 12:57:38 | jroll | I believe flavors should match exactly, others (tripleo, yahoo, ?) don't want that | |
| 12:58:37 | jroll | so I think the answer for now is undersubscribe, use the exact match filters as before if one wants the exact match, and then the resource class stuff will eliminate the discussion | |
| 12:59:13 | cdent | ok, then yeah, the current min_unit setting in jay's new code isn't going to allow that | |
| 13:01:56 | jroll | making a note in the bug report, will write a patch shortly after | |
| 13:07:01 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: remove i18n log markers from nova.api.* https://review.openstack.org/448082 | |
| 13:07:37 | cdent | edleafe is an awkward test | |
| 13:07:56 | cdent | wave something near him, and awkwardness is measured | |
| 13:08:45 | edleafe | cdent: I'm not a test! | |
| 13:08:56 | cdent | how do you know? | |
| 13:09:10 | cdent | maybe you are but no one told you | |
| 13:09:44 | edleafe | Sorry, that sounds too much like those late night "wow, man!" conversations from college | |
| 13:10:05 | cdent | dood | |
| 13:10:31 | cdent | maybe _everyone_ is a test (for different things) | |
| 13:11:32 | edleafe | and... and... maybe we're all tests in some giant alien CI... heavy | |
| 13:11:34 | cdent | wave something near jaypipes get back a report on which normal form you got going on | |
| 13:12:05 | EmilienM | mriedem: fyi, I posted a link before you connected: http://logs.openstack.org/22/447522/1/check-tripleo/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha/7563947/logs/undercloud/var/log/ | |
| 13:12:10 | EmilienM | mriedem: new logs with the debug patch | |
| 13:12:21 | EmilienM | mriedem: (and good morning :-)) | |
| 13:12:23 | jaypipes | cdent: third. | |
| 13:15:14 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1674236 in tripleo "CI / promotion: Nova isn't aware of the nodes that were registered with Ironic" [Critical,Triaged] | |
| 13:15:14 | jroll | mriedem: EmilienM: see my comment here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1674236 | |
| 13:17:57 | EmilienM | jroll: thanks, well explained | |
| 13:20:47 | edleafe | jaypipes: I was going to say 'ab' | |
| 13:22:10 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor: remove _items() in nova/api/openstack/compute/attach_interfaces.py https://review.openstack.org/447698 | |
| 13:22:32 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add description to policies in agents.py https://review.openstack.org/445208 | |
| 13:24:07 | sfinucan | sdague: Could you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430909/ and successors when possible, please? | |
| 13:24:40 | sdague | sfinucan: why are you making a change like this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430717/6/nova/conf/netconf.py ? | |
| 13:25:10 | sfinucan | sdague: It makes the addition of deprecated lines easier for me | |
| 13:25:23 | sdague | why? | |
| 13:25:25 | sfinucan | plus, there's precedent for making everything in '/conf' ultra-consistent | |
| 13:25:34 | sfinucan | I can simply bulk copy-paste | |
| 13:27:10 | sfinucan | but the "making everything in /conf ultra-consistent" is big enough. I've enough of those done that the little differences between each start to get annoying, heh | |
| 13:27:24 | mriedem | jroll: yeah good catch, _compute_node_to_inventory_dict in the old flow hardcodes min_unit to 1 | |
| 13:27:33 | bauzas | EmilienM: mriedem: I'm around to help, could you please tell me the current situation ? | |
| 13:27:43 | mriedem | bauzas: jroll is working on the change | |
| 13:28:11 | openstack | bug 1674236 in tripleo "CI / promotion: Nova isn't aware of the nodes that were registered with Ironic" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674236 | |
| 13:28:11 | jroll | bauzas: read bug 1674236 | |
| 13:28:26 | sdague | sfinucan: honestly, that's kind of exactly the whitespace over eagerness that we stopped doing a couple of years ago. We made E12* non enforcing for a reason. | |
| 13:29:10 | sfinucan | yup, I'd completely agree...outside of '/conf' | |
| 13:29:37 | sdague | no, anyway, we don't want different rules in different places | |
| 13:29:46 | sfinucan | I want to enforce the "consistency is key" mindset in there, in the hopes that it will deliver consistency in the end result | |
| 13:29:52 | sfinucan | which, for the most part, it has been doing | |
| 13:30:42 | sdague | well, I disagree that over prescribed code indentation really impacts useful end user docs :) | |
| 13:31:01 | sfinucan | but it does describe people's mindsets going in there | |
| 13:32:05 | sfinucan | Also, I've done enough of work with that aspect of nova to surely justify the benefit of the doubt | |
| 13:33:23 | bauzas | jroll: mriedem: okay, gaining context :) | |
| 13:33:31 | sdague | I fought really hard against the whitespace wars in the past of people being overly prescriptive, I'm not really interested in bringing that mindset back for any reason | |
| 13:35:40 | openstackgerrit | Jim Rollenhagen proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic: hardcode min_unit for standard resources to 1 https://review.openstack.org/448098 | |
| 13:36:09 | jroll | EmilienM: cdent: bauzas: this should definitely fix the bug, trying to figure out now if I need to change allocations code as well so we don't schedule two (undersubscribed) instances to one node | |
| 13:36:33 | EmilienM | jroll: would you recommend us to change something in tripleo also? | |
| 13:37:06 | jroll | EmilienM: well, I believe flavors should always exactly match nodes, but tripleo not doing that is a "feature", so I'd leave it alone | |
| 13:37:19 | EmilienM | ok | |
| 13:37:26 | EmilienM | jroll: thank you! | |
| 13:37:40 | jroll | np :) | |
| 13:37:54 | EmilienM | jroll: I'm going to try this one | |
| 13:38:11 | jroll | EmilienM: thanks | |
| 13:40:15 | EmilienM | jroll: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447522/ - I'll let you know how it foes | |
| 13:40:17 | EmilienM | goes* | |
| 13:41:31 | jroll | thanks | |
| 13:41:54 | bauzas | EmilienM: jroll: okay, beginning to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448098/ FWIW | |
| 13:43:00 | EmilienM | bauzas: thx | |
| 13:44:02 | bauzas | jroll: oh, excellent catch on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448098/1/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py | |
| 13:44:38 | jroll | bauzas: yeah, was fun | |
| 13:44:43 | bauzas | I think it's a situation where the scheduler is still needed until we implement all the features per the placement engine | |
| 13:44:47 | jroll | we are going to have to change how we do allocations here though :( | |
| 13:45:21 | bauzas | jroll: why so ? you're telling placement to accept returning RPs that have more resources | |
| 13:45:25 | bauzas | jroll: ah I see | |
| 13:45:33 | jroll | :P | |
| 13:45:41 | jroll | yeah, we don't want to leave free resources there | |
| 13:45:41 | bauzas | jroll: so you would create an allocation that would eat all the left resources ? | |