Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-15
05:08:44 openstackgerrit Wei Cao proposed openstack/nova master: vmware: Change the VM Create spec https://review.openstack.org/444119
05:16:19 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/443357
05:25:42 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add api-ref for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/421760
05:42:12 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova master: Permit Live Migration of Rescued Instances https://review.openstack.org/308198
06:55:20 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova master: Standardization of VM diagnostics info API. https://review.openstack.org/355540
07:08:33 openstackgerrit Dinesh Bhor proposed openstack/nova master: Use HostAddressOpt for opts that accept IP and hostnames https://review.openstack.org/445782
07:11:32 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Live Migration of Rescued Instances https://review.openstack.org/347161
08:10:02 jichen alex_xu, hi have time for a quick talk?
08:10:29 alex_xu jichen: yea, sure, please
08:10:47 openstack Launchpad bug 1670978 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "most of extended server attributes returned in 2.3 api versions should not require admin role" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to jichenjc (jichenjc)
08:10:47 jichen https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1670978, this need a spec ,right? if any changes might need to be done
08:11:12 alex_xu jichen: 不需要
08:11:16 alex_xu sorry
08:11:19 alex_xu jichen: it needn't
08:11:26 jichen why ?
08:11:46 jichen API changes no spec needed any more ?
08:11:58 alex_xu jichen: it is only about change a default value of a policy rule from admin-only to owner_or_admin
08:12:54 jichen um... part of the return value affected ,I thought if we affect output format , this is API change?
08:13:33 alex_xu jichen: yea, that always confuse us, but actually, that can't be resolved by microversion, it should be resolved by capabilities API
08:14:09 alex_xu jichen: here is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386555/
08:14:12 jichen alex_xu: so this bug might need the API-WG discussion on cap talk settle down then continue?
08:14:24 alex_xu jichen: i think no...
08:14:29 jichen alex_xu: yeah, I knew this discussion
08:14:41 jichen ok, I will give another thought and see how to proceed this
08:14:44 alex_xu johnthetubaguy: ^ I think we needn't waiting for cap API, right?
08:15:19 alex_xu jichen: thanks, if johnthetubaguy also ensure this needn't waiting for cap API, then ping me when the patch ready
08:15:32 jichen ok
08:15:42 jichen another question
08:15:54 alex_xu jichen: yea, please
08:16:41 jichen https://review.openstack.org/307675, it's abandoned but this seems discussed before and a potential item? any discussion on PTG about it ?
08:17:15 jichen Change subject: Make API errors conform to API-WG schema
08:17:16 alex_xu jichen: there is no discussion about this in the PTG
08:17:40 jichen ok... I went through the ethpad and didn't find anything....
08:17:58 alex_xu jichen: yea, I didn't remember we bring that idea into the api meeting before PTG also
08:18:05 jichen so it might be restore back later after P , Q ... :) ?
08:18:20 alex_xu jichen: yea, first ensure someone commit to work on it
08:18:28 jichen I can't remember clearly but seems I saw it's discussed somewhere
08:18:43 alex_xu jichen: there is proposal add that into placement API
08:18:54 jichen ok, can you point me the link?
08:19:02 alex_xu searching the link
08:19:08 jichen ok, thanks~
08:19:25 alex_xu jichen: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418393/
08:19:36 alex_xu maybe co-work with that spec, and migrate the solution into the nova api
08:19:44 jichen alex_xu: great, thanks a lot~
08:19:51 jichen I will take a look :)
08:19:57 alex_xu jichen: np :)
09:00:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Make guest.BlockDevice only use the target dev of a disk https://review.openstack.org/402163
09:00:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: utils.get_disk return the target dev of the root device https://review.openstack.org/402716
09:39:20 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: allow owner to retrieve some data by default https://review.openstack.org/445844
09:41:33 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: allow owner to retrieve some data by default https://review.openstack.org/445844
09:44:53 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceList.get_by_instance_mapping_list() https://review.openstack.org/445141
09:51:23 mdbooth lyarwood: Morning. Can you point me at your series again?
09:53:37 lyarwood mdbooth: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bug/1489581 & https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/cinder-new-attach-apis
09:54:15 lyarwood mdbooth: the first two are just nice to have, we've been trying to get a uuid added for bdms for ages
09:54:52 mdbooth lyarwood: K. I'll ask a series of dumb questions throughout the morning in all likelihood
09:55:06 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Make server_external_events use an optimal number of db queries https://review.openstack.org/445142
09:55:54 lyarwood mdbooth: np and thanks for looking at this
10:05:25 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova-specs master: TinyFix: Changed type of CPU ID from 'String' to 'Integer' in diagnostics spec https://review.openstack.org/445855
10:19:11 ildikov lyarwood: hi
10:19:45 ildikov lyarwood: are the BDM patches ready for review?
10:20:10 lyarwood ildikov: yes, mdbooth is going over them now
10:20:31 ildikov lyarwood: I saw on the priority etherpad that they are still listed under subteam review, but if you fixed Matt's comments, etc then I'll move them to ready
10:20:48 ildikov lyarwood: great, I'll move them on the etherpad too
10:20:56 ildikov lyarwood: tnx
10:21:42 mdbooth lyarwood: Do you happen to know why we don't refer to bdms by the primary key (id)?
10:22:04 mdbooth We don't do that anywhere, so this isn't an outlier
10:22:10 mdbooth Just wondering if you know why
10:23:04 lyarwood I wasn't aware that we ever did that so no, if we did I don't know why we stopped
10:24:31 mdbooth I suppose the db's primary key isn't universally unique...
10:24:52 lyarwood yeah, as we are moving towards multiple dbs etc I guess we needed uuids
10:27:32 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate the Cinder API v2 support https://review.openstack.org/444253
10:27:47 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove keypair server extension https://review.openstack.org/396611
10:27:57 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Another poc for removing stevedore for nova api https://review.openstack.org/445864
10:29:35 arslanq hi guys, i am confused about live migration of VMs. What is the requirement of live migration does it require shared storage ?
10:32:08 rpodolyaka arslanq: it does not. libvirt can 'block migrate' the storage for you
10:32:22 rpodolyaka arslanq: that being said, shared storage is highly recommended
10:33:16 MasterofJOKers https://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/compute-configuring-migrations.html#block-migration
10:37:58 arslanq rpodolyaka: Thanks, i am facing some errors on block migration. i'll get back to you
10:50:43 openstackgerrit Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.trigger_crash_dump notification https://review.openstack.org/396225
11:04:05 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Delete nic metadata when detaching interface https://review.openstack.org/435387
11:04:05 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622
11:04:06 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100
11:04:07 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Delete disk metadata when detaching volume https://review.openstack.org/435082
11:04:11 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941
11:04:12 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021
11:04:13 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520
11:09:53 asettle Morning bauzas and johnthetubaguy - Brian seems to be having issues with his CentOS install (which, he htinks is environment related). Is there anyone in here that could test on CentOS or RHEL for us?
11:09:58 asettle We're 2/3rds there
11:17:11 openstackgerrit Maxim Nestratov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: reintroduce runtime image type detection https://review.openstack.org/363547
11:26:51 mnestratov mdbooth: hi
11:27:01 mnestratov regarding ^^
11:27:22 mdbooth mnestratov: Yeah, I don't think I'm ever going to like that :(
11:28:09 mdbooth I'm very much in favour of multi-backend support, though.
11:28:14 mdbooth Just not with static config.
11:28:14 mnestratov and I repeat what I just aksed in review - how do we change current default behavir?
11:28:54 mnestratov *behavior
11:29:28 mdbooth 2 things: associate the backend in use somehow with the bdm, so it lives with the instance not with the host config
11:29:49 mnestratov I'm fine with it
11:30:10 mdbooth Second: configure a *default* somehow, or pass it in the api in a driver-agnostic way
11:30:32 mdbooth Advantage of doing the former is that you can change your mind about the latter

Earlier   Later