Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-08
18:17:24 sfinucan However, I'm not sure what the plan is for weighers and what the migration path is when we move to resource providers, so I'd definitely like jaypipes' input
18:17:42 sfinucan For now though, it's late and the Lego Batman movie isn't going to see itself :)
18:18:16 sean-k-mooney sfinucan: nice i must go see that soon.
18:18:28 sean-k-mooney sfinucan: let me know if its any good :)
18:21:10 bauzas mriedem: I +W'd https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442723/1 but I think we could possibly have follow-ups
18:21:14 bauzas see commentqs
18:21:25 openstackgerrit Dan Peschman proposed openstack/nova master: No API cell up-call to delete consoleauth tokens https://review.openstack.org/415922
18:21:58 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add functools.wraps to wrapper https://review.openstack.org/443175
18:22:08 mriedem dansmith: no ice_t?
18:22:28 dansmith mriedem: if I can't have my fun you can't either
18:22:45 mriedem works for me
18:22:52 bauzas dansmith: wow, chilling at the series https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441461/8
18:23:04 dansmith the first time it came up, I was going to rename it to gangsta_rapper
18:23:06 sean-k-mooney inc0: what is the actully error that ye are seeing with libvirt 2.5?
18:23:20 dansmith bauzas: all but one tempest test is passing with multiple cells with that series :)
18:23:33 bauzas \o/
18:23:37 bauzas heh for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443175/3/nova/conductor/manager.py
18:23:41 dansmith and I had that working before, but broke it in cleanup
18:23:46 bauzas that remembers me some comment I made :)
18:25:09 bauzas dansmith: any reason why you added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443175/3/nova/conductor/manager.py as a top patch and not just modified https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438022/15 ?
18:25:21 sean-k-mooney inc0: oh appolgies my libvert is 1.3.1 for some reason i guess i dont have the cloud archive enabled
18:25:22 dansmith bauzas: yes, see the comments
18:25:26 bauzas oh ok
18:25:30 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/nova master: Replace obsolete vanity openstack.org URLs https://review.openstack.org/443266
18:25:32 dansmith bauzas: I would eat all infra re-pushing for that nit
18:26:20 bauzas dansmith: um ok
18:26:23 mriedem dansmith: comments inline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438022/15
18:29:36 dansmith mriedem: replies inline.. I'd tack the log fix into the rapper fix if it were me, but your call
18:30:09 dansmith if you want it fixed, I'll just squash that nit patch into this one
18:30:20 dansmith fixed pre-merge I mean
18:31:13 mriedem dansmith: question about the decorator on build_instances - that's not just cellsv1, it's also reschedules from the compute manager - but at that point we're already targeted right?
18:31:40 dansmith mriedem: right, and so we can't actually look up there, so the target would have to be graceful and fail, yet it'd be ugly
18:31:49 dansmith mriedem: that goes back to the cell conductor instead of super
18:32:13 mriedem oh yeah, need that diagram
18:32:44 mriedem so i'm ok with fixing the log thing in the rapper patch, but can you also put a comment in that patch for both the build_instances thing and mdbooth's question that had a long explanation?
18:32:55 dansmith yep
18:33:00 mriedem word homey
18:33:31 mriedem also,
18:33:38 mriedem no one mentioned your flock of seagulls reference
18:33:41 mriedem pick a genre
18:33:52 dansmith mriedem: I know, I thought that was amusing :)
18:34:00 mriedem i got it though
18:34:59 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #4: full flavor https://review.openstack.org/391288
18:35:14 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: console https://review.openstack.org/409402
18:35:50 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Address minor feedback in superconductor targeting https://review.openstack.org/443175
18:36:17 dansmith mriedem: at least I was decade consistent
18:36:23 dansmith afaik, nobody calls them "rappers" anymore
18:36:32 dansmith but they did around the seagulls timeframe
18:36:32 mriedem what are they called now?
18:36:54 dansmith um, I dunno, "Hip Hop Artists" ?
18:37:12 mriedem yeah maybe
18:37:14 mriedem gdi kids
18:37:16 mriedem *gd
18:37:19 dansmith I feel like if someone said "who's your favorite rapper" nowadays you'd get laughed at, but in the 80s that was a serious question
18:37:34 mriedem "umm, vanilla ice, duh!"
18:37:44 dansmith I'm sure that was the right answer in heartland america :)
18:38:00 mriedem oh psh
18:38:25 mriedem odb
18:38:27 mriedem snoop?!
18:38:54 dansmith snoop was on the trailing end of calling them rappers I think
18:38:57 dansmith I'm thinking more like "sir mix a lot" or "ice cube"
18:39:04 mriedem oh yeah, too $short
18:39:06 dansmith definitely ice-t, he was an early mover
18:39:07 mriedem oops
18:39:09 mriedem Too $hort
18:39:22 mriedem filthy, filthy lyrics
18:40:20 JayF I think I found your favorite rapper: http://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/nova.html
18:41:17 mriedem heh
18:41:29 artom The shame of being the *fifth* most poplar person named Nova
18:41:53 JayF lol
18:42:12 artom Being sixth and last isn't too bad, it means nobody knows or cares about you
18:42:20 edleafe This is more mriedem's style: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yerCiByca4
18:42:36 artom But second to last... Someone cares just enough to give you hope, and then it's all dashed when you find out it's meaningless
18:44:42 mriedem edleafe: need i remind you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5Fgp-KihIA
18:45:11 edleafe mriedem: ARRRGGGH! Not twice in two days!
18:45:17 mriedem my wife accused me of being angry and dissatisfied with everything all the time last night, and i said, oh yeah, would an angry guy have this song within an arms reach?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5Fgp-KihIA
18:45:47 dansmith heh
18:46:34 edleafe mriedem: of course he would - to torture his victims with!
18:50:39 mriedem alright back to work
19:20:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Address minor feedback in superconductor targeting https://review.openstack.org/443175
19:20:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Sort CellMappingList.get_all() for safety https://review.openstack.org/443174
19:20:50 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_by_instance_uuids() to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/443292
19:20:50 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add workaround to disable group policy check upcall https://review.openstack.org/442736
19:20:51 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make server_groups determine deleted-ness from InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/443293
20:04:09 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_by_instance_uuids() to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/443292
20:04:09 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Sort CellMappingList.get_all() for safety https://review.openstack.org/443174
20:04:10 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make server_groups determine deleted-ness from InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/443293
20:04:10 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Address minor feedback in superconductor targeting https://review.openstack.org/443175
20:04:11 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add workaround to disable group policy check upcall https://review.openstack.org/442736
20:24:22 jaypipes mriedem: sorry, been out for a few hours dealing with a couple things. yes, ComputeNode.stats is where that stuff lives, IIRC.
20:26:38 mriedem dansmith: this one is a bit hairy https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442162/
20:26:42 mriedem but pretty sure _find_service is busted
20:27:08 mriedem jaypipes: np. want to get this in? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415885
20:30:54 dansmith mriedem: there's a reason I did it that way, give me a sec to remember
20:30:58 dansmith mriedem: but I commented on the others
20:34:03 jaypipes mriedem: sure, gimme a sec
20:35:19 dansmith mriedem: I'm not sure, it works locally and in the gate in the not-first cell looking for n-cpu
20:35:29 dansmith but I'm having trouble fetching the context from my brain
20:36:54 dansmith oh, no, wait
20:36:55 dansmith I bet that is only in the path of service delete,

Earlier   Later