Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-28
21:50:31 mriedem yeah, and then the scheduler passing that into the resource provider GET query with the filter param right?
21:50:38 mriedem and something something aggregates fits in there too
21:50:53 mriedem so,
21:51:11 mriedem the immediate need for this is for scheduling with shared storage pools and aggregate resource providers right?
21:51:39 mriedem we have a separate bp for that - we could just tie this into that work and decouple the data model change from the REST API/scheduling fallout that will probably come from the traits spec
21:51:41 mriedem if that makes sense
21:52:16 dansmith scheduler asks for that trait to placement, but yeah
21:52:42 dansmith the immediate need is that we can't start reporting any shared pool resources (regardless of if we use them) until we can distinguish them from compute nodes
21:52:53 mriedem yeah, so let's do the traits data model change under https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shared-resources-pike
21:53:10 mriedem is that a fair compromise?
21:53:42 dansmith is that a paperwork hack?
21:53:47 dansmith I don't care how you justify it :P
21:54:52 mriedem it's a papercut
21:55:24 dansmith *rimshot*
21:55:34 mriedem jaypipes: oh sql wizard of yore, can you answer my question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376198/11/nova/db/sqlalchemy/api_migrations/migrate_repo/versions/041_resource_provider_traits.py@57 ?
21:57:02 mriedem cburgess: L33 here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-pike-cinder
21:57:12 cburgess mriedem Yes what?
21:57:16 mriedem cburgess: what was the outcome of that? wasn't it "roll this into johnthetubaguy's spec"?
21:57:23 cburgess Yes it was
21:57:49 mriedem hot
21:57:50 mriedem damn
21:58:15 cburgess mriedem See my comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373203/14
21:58:22 cburgess I need to re-review that though now.
21:59:07 mriedem thus concludes my nova/cinder recap email, yay
22:00:05 cburgess mriedem I'll review rev 15 of that spec today and update with any comments I have as it related to our spec that needs to be merged into this one.
22:00:21 mriedem super
22:09:17 cburgess mriedem Comments added. We still need to account for the changes that will impact BFV in the spec
22:12:56 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Default firewall_driver to nova.virt.firewall.NoopFirewallDriver https://review.openstack.org/439187
22:36:01 jaypipes mriedem: answered. sorry for delay.
22:36:13 jaypipes mriedem: I blame cburgess.
22:36:34 cburgess jaypipes Wait what did I do this time?
22:37:21 mriedem jaypipes: i'm not sure i understand your response
22:37:34 mriedem resource_provider_traits doesn't have a unique constraint defined, but it has 2 primary keys
22:37:47 mriedem do we not need a unique constraint because of those 2 primary keys?
22:38:28 cburgess A primary key is already unique. Why would you need to unique them again?
22:38:36 jaypipes cburgess: everything. you did everything.
22:38:45 mriedem it's the combo, but i think i'm just over thinking it
22:38:52 jaypipes mriedem: the primary key is unique and already contains trait and provider id, yes.
22:39:02 cburgess jaypipes I'm glad someone has finally realized that.
22:39:53 jaypipes mriedem: and the uniqueness isn't dependent on the order. In other words, the constraint of uniqueness over (trait, provider) applies implicitly to (provider, trait)
22:42:38 mriedem and we're doing a mapping table b/c you can have M:M
22:42:52 mriedem unlike inventories/resource_classes
22:43:06 mriedem a single inventory has a single resource class
22:43:11 mriedem but a resource provider can have multiple traits
22:43:19 mriedem and a trait can be used by multiple resource providers
22:43:28 mriedem used/exposed whatever
22:43:36 mriedem alright
22:44:19 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Add Traits related table to the api database https://review.openstack.org/376198
22:45:08 mriedem jaypipes: dansmith: ok +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376198/ now
22:49:57 jaypipes mriedem: yup, zactly correct.
22:50:06 jaypipes mriedem: and thanks for adding that blueprint to get this going.
22:50:18 dansmith jaypipes: left the +W for you
22:51:14 mriedem ok hosers i'll talk to you tomorrow
22:52:16 dansmith melwitt: *gasp* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438025/
22:52:33 dansmith looks like the gate is too busy to run my devstack patch against that, but at least it's passing the regular setup
22:53:40 jaypipes Wallaby'd.
23:00:30 masber hi
23:00:46 dansmith infra says nodepool is jammed up, fyi to anyone waiting
23:01:26 masber anybody knows why when I do "nova image-create --poll ..." the image size is 0?
23:01:53 masber I am following this document --> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/5/html/End_User_Guide/cli_migrate_instances.html#create_snapshot
23:02:10 masber and this one --> https://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/cli-use-snapshots-to-migrate-instances.html
23:02:38 dansmith masber: that first document is about icehouse, which is ancient. nova image routines are deprecated, and this is not a support channel (please see topic)
23:11:30 masber dansmith, sorry, I couldn't get help on #openstack channel
23:11:57 masber so i was wondering if I could get some ideas from here as the people is specialised on nova...
23:12:01 masber apologise again
23:46:48 melwitt dansmith: woot \o/
23:53:32 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: ironic inventory reporting https://review.openstack.org/437602
23:54:27 jaypipes dansmith: ok dokey :) ^^ hopefully I got it right this time.
23:54:41 jaypipes heading back to hotel from office... biab.
23:58:00 cburgess jaypipes Yick another week of travel right after PTG?
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-01
00:43:00 jaypipes cburgess: yup.
01:20:20 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova master: Port binding based on events during live migration https://review.openstack.org/434870
04:12:36 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/439329
04:16:08 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/439361
04:50:13 gaoyuan who is unicell
05:21:13 prometheanfire so, upgrades broken due to a db rename?
05:31:47 prometheanfire getting this isn't that helpful :|
05:31:48 prometheanfire Unable to sync cell0 schema: (psycopg2.OperationalError) FATAL: database "nova_cell0" does not exist
05:31:48 prometheanfire Cell0 is already setup
05:32:10 prometheanfire is it still calling the setup even if it's already set up?
06:01:49 openstackgerrit MarkMielke proposed openstack/nova master: DiskFilter handling for free space less than zero https://review.openstack.org/430091
06:25:55 prometheanfire the nova_cell0 db creation was non-obvious, might want to update the ocata release notes / install guide
06:26:02 prometheanfire working now at least :D
06:33:49 prometheanfire docs don't mention placement being needed by compute hosts either
06:41:59 gaoyuan who is gorian
06:48:45 prometheanfire what port does placement go on by default?
07:43:21 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: live-mig: Add claims and proper resource tracking https://review.openstack.org/244489
07:43:24 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: pass libvirt reference methods to migration https://review.openstack.org/328997
07:43:25 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: live-migrate updates NUMA and cpus in the XML https://review.openstack.org/286744
07:45:58 Gorian gaoyuan, just me - why ?
07:46:18 Gorian 374 people in this channel, and you are wondering why I am? :P
08:09:30 openstackgerrit MarkMielke proposed openstack/nova master: DiskFilter handling for free space less than zero https://review.openstack.org/430091
08:25:26 openstackgerrit MarkMielke proposed openstack/nova master: DiskFilter handling for free space less than zero https://review.openstack.org/430091
08:27:02 bauzas good morning Nova
08:34:58 openstackgerrit Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] OVS acceleration https://review.openstack.org/398265
08:39:09 ftersin johnthetubaguy: hi. could you please look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304715/ , i tried to address your comments, but not sure the result is what you wanted, since you didn't answer on my questions there
08:43:06 johnthetubaguy ftersin: we discussed at the PTG adding a cinder ephemeral disk driver, would that work for you?
08:49:19 ftersin johnthetubaguy: it will consume volumes which will be a bit different than running instances w/o cinder at all
08:50:05 johnthetubaguy ftersin: the user's Nova API calls would be identical, its just the code creating the disks would create volumes in Cinder.
08:51:39 ftersin johnthetubaguy: moreover, that solution is just discussed, but not implemented yet. From the other side we have that solution, which is implemented for previous OS versions as well, and integrated to JuJu and Fuel via corresponding charms/plugins

Earlier   Later