| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-02-24 | |||
| 14:42:48 | tonyb | sfinucan: okay so basically somehow the requirements repo is messed up I'll go through the history to work out exactly how we got into that state | |
| 14:43:17 | tonyb | but the bottom line is that what you want to do should have been okay but $human messed up | |
| 14:43:29 | sfinucan | tonyb: So it wasn't just me :) OK, cool | |
| 14:44:00 | sfinucan | If you do fix it though, we might want to knock Sphinx down to 1.4 temporarily, because 1.5 is broken with the latest pbr https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430618/ | |
| 14:54:08 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: ironic inventory reporting https://review.openstack.org/437602 | |
| 14:55:05 | jaypipes | cdent: hey, I'm getting the following error on the functional test I just added in ^ patch: http://paste.openstack.org/show/600383/ | |
| 14:55:28 | jaypipes | cdent: I got this when I created this functional test on the old nova/ironic patch but can't remember what I did to fix... | |
| 14:55:35 | jaypipes | cdent: any insight would be appreciated. | |
| 14:56:08 | jaypipes | cdent: specifically, it's this test: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437602/2/nova/tests/functional/compute/test_resource_tracker.py | |
| 14:56:17 | cdent | jaypipes: it ended up not being a problem with wsgi_intercept, I think it was a missing keystone related mock | |
| 14:56:30 | jaypipes | cdent: yeah, can't remember though... | |
| 14:56:38 | jaypipes | cdent: oh, shit... I know what it might be. | |
| 14:56:54 | jaypipes | I think we landed something yesterday that did a load_auth_from_conf() or something? | |
| 14:57:09 | gmann | http://logs.openstack.org/98/437898/1/experimental/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-devstack-plugin-nfs-nv/fb81298/logs/tempest.txt.gz#_2017-02-24_14_00_57_338 | |
| 14:57:22 | cdent | jaypipes: yeah | |
| 15:00:41 | mordred | rcarrillocruz: oh wow. I'm super excited about that | |
| 15:00:57 | smcginnis | jaypipes: Any chance you might have a few minutes to give the Cinder team (and Manila representation) a quick overview of the long term plan for placement-api? | |
| 15:01:16 | jaypipes | smcginnis: for sure. | |
| 15:01:28 | jaypipes | smcginnis: just wrapping up a little bug right now... | |
| 15:01:36 | jaypipes | smcginnis: maybe in about 30 minutes? | |
| 15:01:38 | smcginnis | jaypipes: We're in ATL 1-2 if you want to stop by when you have time. | |
| 15:01:45 | smcginnis | jaypipes: Sounds great, thanks! | |
| 15:01:47 | jaypipes | smcginnis: cool. | |
| 15:02:15 | jaypipes | cdent: think I got it... | |
| 15:02:27 | jaypipes | cdent: all goes back to the scheduler_client vs. report_client thing.... | |
| 15:02:35 | cdent | nnnngh | |
| 15:02:42 | jaypipes | cdent: I'm setting RT.report_client instead of RT.scheduler_client | |
| 15:04:17 | jaypipes | cdent: yep, that was it. | |
| 15:08:27 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: do you want to talk about accelerating sriov with dpdk? | |
| 15:09:26 | mriedem | ralonsoh: are you at the PTG? if so, show up to the nova room (georgia 9) to talk about your sriov stuff | |
| 15:09:42 | ralonsoh | I'm going now | |
| 15:11:03 | melwitt | dansmith: if the ClientRouter stuff isn't going to work, then I guess we'll need to revert https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326906 and then build upon the revert? | |
| 15:11:52 | dansmith | melwitt: I have a hack ready to push soon, but yeah, nearly a revert I think, but I will salvage some of what is there | |
| 15:12:06 | melwitt | okay | |
| 15:17:09 | mriedem | sfinucan: weren't you removing run_tests.sh from nova? | |
| 15:17:22 | sfinucan | mriedem: I did? | |
| 15:17:39 | mriedem | i thought you had a patch while you were cleaning up the unused venv and colorizer stuff | |
| 15:18:11 | mriedem | sfinucan: nevermind then, someone was asking me about removing it | |
| 15:21:01 | sfinucan | mriedem: Yeah, I'm pretty certain I did that and they've merged | |
| 15:21:40 | sfinucan | mriedem: Ah, no - I didn't do that one. I will https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:feat/tools-cleanup | |
| 15:21:41 | bauzas | sfinucan: you did the change for having a specific tox target for osprofiler ? | |
| 15:21:52 | sfinucan | bauzas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437055/ | |
| 15:22:49 | bauzas | sfinucan: to be fair, we need a specific job in infra that would run that target as a Depends-On | |
| 15:24:00 | sfinucan | bauzas: Yeah, I wasn't sure if it would run automatically because I added it to the default targets or no | |
| 15:24:36 | mriedem | sfinucan: i just told this person to deal with run_tests.sh | |
| 15:24:39 | mriedem | sfinucan: so let them | |
| 15:24:57 | sfinucan | (y) | |
| 15:25:13 | bauzas | sfinucan: I doubt we run UTs in the gate by calling tox without args :p | |
| 15:25:18 | sdague | EmilienM: I left some debugging comments in the trippleo bug, I think at this point we need a keystone person to help figure out what's coming back | |
| 15:27:38 | openstackgerrit | Ryan Rossiter proposed openstack/nova master: Remove run_tests.sh https://review.openstack.org/437947 | |
| 15:30:15 | EmilienM | sdague: ok thanks | |
| 15:30:49 | EmilienM | mriedem, sdague: could we revisit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428424/ please? | |
| 15:30:55 | sdague | EmilienM: there is also no user identity being logged in the logs for API calls, so it's hard to figure out what is happening | |
| 15:30:59 | EmilienM | I think tripleo jobs bring good feedback | |
| 15:32:54 | rcarrillocruz | johnthetubaguy: oh, that for linking, that makes sense | |
| 15:36:53 | sdague | EmilienM: I'm definitely -1 on per commit runs of that | |
| 15:40:58 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Reserve NUMA nodes with PCI devices attached https://review.openstack.org/364468 | |
| 15:42:45 | EmilienM | sdague: did you read the commit message, | |
| 15:42:47 | EmilienM | ? | |
| 15:42:53 | EmilienM | "The theory here is that Nova devs are going to dig through these," | |
| 15:43:04 | EmilienM | you're wrong, if you read the commit message, I said the opposite | |
| 15:43:19 | EmilienM | " The | |
| 15:43:21 | EmilienM | job would be non-voting for now, please don't ignore it and report | |
| 15:43:23 | EmilienM | failures on #tripleo or ping EmilienM on #openstack-nova. If nobody | |
| 15:43:25 | EmilienM | replies shortly or don't give feedback on the failure, you can ignore | |
| 15:43:27 | EmilienM | it and move forward in your review process. Though we hope it can be | |
| 15:43:29 | EmilienM | useful to track some bugs." | |
| 15:45:04 | sdague | EmilienM: right, you've said now nova devs are responsible to report issues back | |
| 15:45:30 | EmilienM | sdague: in which room are you? | |
| 15:45:38 | sdague | I'm generally against all that kind of project linkage, we spent so much time decomposing that | |
| 15:46:22 | EmilienM | sdague: let's talk about this thing face to face so we can find a solution | |
| 15:46:28 | sdague | EmilienM: the nova room. But you either get to have me actually figure out this keystone issue, or spend time not convincing me to agree to this | |
| 15:46:31 | sdague | so pick | |
| 15:49:55 | jroll | mriedem: y'all doing priorities/deadlines today? | |
| 15:51:40 | mriedem | jroll: maybe this afternoon | |
| 15:51:48 | mriedem | we're not even close to being done with topics | |
| 15:51:56 | jroll | word, put ironic at the top for me. kthx. | |
| 15:52:23 | jroll | I won't be here this afternoon, so will check the output, thank you :) | |
| 15:52:36 | mriedem | jroll: ironic at the top of the nova priority list? | |
| 15:52:45 | jroll | mriedem: yep | |
| 15:52:47 | mriedem | ok done | |
| 15:52:52 | jroll | \o/ | |
| 15:54:21 | mriedem | kevinbenton: do you have a link to the etherpad for the nova/neutron/os-vif xp session that happened on tuesday? | |
| 16:01:25 | nicodemus_ | hello | |
| 16:02:07 | nicodemus_ | is it possible to create two AZs, one that points to the rotational disks of the computes and another that points to the SSD disks on the same compute nodes? | |
| 16:02:39 | nicodemus_ | Or should I have half the computes with SSD in one AZ, and the other half with spinning disks in another AZ? | |
| 16:07:01 | bauzas | nicodemus_: one host can be in two aggregates, but it can be exposed as only one AZ | |
| 16:08:53 | nicodemus_ | bauzas, ok... so I should separate the disks among compute nodes, in order to have a single type ok disk per compute | |
| 16:08:56 | nicodemus_ | right? | |
| 16:09:16 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Reserve NUMA nodes with PCI devices attached https://review.openstack.org/364468 | |
| 16:20:46 | mriedem | dansmith: jaypipes: we're going to start moving again on misc stuff | |
| 16:25:34 | mriedem | jroll: we're tlaking about virt and metal in the same region | |
| 16:26:17 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 16:26:18 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358 | |
| 16:27:35 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach/detach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 16:27:36 | openstackgerrit | Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Remove check_attach https://review.openstack.org/335358 | |
| 16:29:39 | kevinbenton | mriedem: it's not clear to me there was one | |
| 16:29:49 | kevinbenton | mriedem: i came into the room an ianw was already talking about specs | |
| 16:30:02 | mriedem | yeah i couldn't find anything | |
| 16:30:07 | kevinbenton | mriedem: so i'm not sure if someone was capturing things in etherpads | |