| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-02-21 | |||
| 13:16:08 | jaosorior | gibi: I'll let you know when we do. But we would need pretty much these ones https://github.com/openstack/novajoin/blob/master/novajoin/notifications.py#L56 before we can migrate | |
| 13:20:57 | gibi | jaosorior: you can always help us transforming the floating ip notifications | |
| 13:21:21 | gibi | jaosorior: there are lot of examples already merged or up on review | |
| 13:21:55 | jaosorior | gibi: pass me some patchsets and I'll see what I can do. my plate is quite full at the moment but I could try to make some time. | |
| 13:23:04 | gibi | jaosorior: for example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/394511/ | |
| 13:23:55 | jaosorior | gibi: thanks | |
| 13:24:14 | gibi | jaosorior: here is the ocata topic with all the patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/versioned-notification-transformation-ocata | |
| 13:31:14 | openstackgerrit | Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova-specs master: change pci-passthrough-whitelist-regex spec to 644 https://review.openstack.org/436451 | |
| 13:34:11 | openstackgerrit | Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova-specs master: User-controlled SR-IOV ports allocation https://review.openstack.org/182242 | |
| 13:50:02 | mriedem | dansmith: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426926/ | |
| 13:58:52 | frickler | is there a placement-api client planned? from a deployers perspective, it would seem nice to have an easy way to check the data in the db | |
| 14:06:55 | mriedem | edmondsw: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100586.html | |
| 14:07:02 | mriedem | for the nova-network deprecation/removal talk at the newton midcycle | |
| 14:08:06 | mriedem | which reminds me that we need to remove the network CLIs from novaclient | |
| 14:18:59 | openstackgerrit | Gyorgy Szombathelyi proposed openstack/nova master: Use the keystone session loader in the placement reporting https://review.openstack.org/436475 | |
| 14:23:33 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Libvirt driver emulator threads placement policy https://review.openstack.org/427066 | |
| 14:34:56 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: add numa constraints for emulator threads policy https://review.openstack.org/385023 | |
| 14:34:59 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: return a CPU overhead if isolate emulator threads requested https://review.openstack.org/385364 | |
| 14:35:00 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: fit instance topology with cpus reserved onto cores https://review.openstack.org/400875 | |
| 14:35:01 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: virt: update overhead to take into account vCPUs https://review.openstack.org/385024 | |
| 14:35:04 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: make emulator threads to run on the reserved pCPU https://review.openstack.org/400878 | |
| 14:35:05 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: update numa usage incording the cpu reserved https://review.openstack.org/400877 | |
| 14:35:05 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: numa: take into account cpus reserved https://review.openstack.org/400876 | |
| 14:54:14 | openstackgerrit | Dinesh Bhor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Policy support for specific metadata keys https://review.openstack.org/436493 | |
| 14:54:52 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: WIP: Remove deprecated image commands/API bindings https://review.openstack.org/436494 | |
| 14:58:19 | mriedem | frickler: mlavalle has one somewhere, sec | |
| 14:59:20 | mriedem | frickler: https://github.com/miguellavalle/python-placementclient | |
| 15:00:07 | mriedem | i don't think that's the one i was thinking of, it doesn't have any code in it | |
| 15:00:52 | mriedem | cdent: do you remember where miguel's osc placement client plugin lives? ^ | |
| 15:01:33 | cdent | mriedem: yeah, one sec | |
| 15:01:41 | mriedem | https://github.com/miguellavalle/python-placementclient/tree/adding-grp-support | |
| 15:01:43 | mriedem | found it | |
| 15:01:49 | cdent | https://github.com/miguellavalle/python-placementclient | |
| 15:01:57 | cdent | more coke | |
| 15:02:10 | frickler | mriedem: cdent: ah, nice, thanks | |
| 15:02:18 | mriedem | cdent: yeah the branch was the key | |
| 15:02:21 | mriedem | master is mostly empty | |
| 15:03:38 | cdent | frickler: what we found in the resource tracker was that a client wasn't all that needed. keystoneauth makes it pretty easy | |
| 15:04:52 | mriedem | i think admins are still going to want something in osc | |
| 15:05:03 | mriedem | for linking aggregates to resource providers | |
| 15:05:15 | cdent | mriedem: yeah, sure, just noting it | |
| 15:05:20 | tittywai | hi... what country are you people from | |
| 15:06:04 | mriedem | tittywai: that's a very random question, is there context? | |
| 15:06:13 | edmondsw | tittywai lots of different ones | |
| 15:06:19 | frickler | it may be easy, but for an operator it would still be nice to have a command at the end of https://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/placement.html that confirms that all computes have successfully placed their data into the api | |
| 15:07:00 | tittywai | no what I mean is that.. where you are right now.. to be more specific... :P | |
| 15:07:26 | mriedem | tittywai: many people are currently at the PTG in Atlanta, GA in the US | |
| 15:08:12 | bauzas | frickler: I think it's a bit premature to have that, given we also need to cut the current methods we use into a different module at least | |
| 15:08:36 | bauzas | frickler: a separate try was https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417111/ | |
| 15:08:56 | tittywai | mriedem: thanks for the info | |
| 15:09:01 | tittywai | im from sg | |
| 15:09:06 | mriedem | bauzas: frickler just wants to know they are fully upgraded i believe | |
| 15:09:16 | mriedem | so that all computes are reporting into placement so the filter scheduler starts using placement | |
| 15:09:27 | bauzas | um ok | |
| 15:09:56 | mriedem | so i guess nova hypervisor-list wc matches placement resource-provider-list | |
| 15:10:02 | mriedem | or something like that | |
| 15:10:05 | mriedem | frickler: please confirm | |
| 15:10:23 | mriedem | frickler: also, check out the "nova-status upgrade check" command | |
| 15:10:44 | mriedem | frickler: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/man/nova-status.html#upgrade | |
| 15:10:51 | mriedem | that might help you in the meantime | |
| 15:11:05 | satyar | hi mriedem | |
| 15:11:10 | frickler | nova-status: command not found -- for Newton | |
| 15:11:17 | mriedem | frickler: new in ocata | |
| 15:12:32 | markus_z | mriedem: Now is a bad time to ask you about the newton backport for serial console https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406898/ right? | |
| 15:12:34 | frickler | we are currently doing Newton deployments but want to make sure we have the placement-api in place there properly, so that the upgrade to Ocata will be easier | |
| 15:12:45 | mriedem | markus_z: yup | |
| 15:12:47 | mriedem | satyar: hi | |
| 15:13:00 | markus_z | np, I'll ask again next week | |
| 15:13:19 | bauzas | mriedem: I see | |
| 15:13:24 | mriedem | frickler: yeah. you could install nova ocata in a venv and run it against newton with your full nova.conf | |
| 15:13:36 | mriedem | nova.conf from the control node | |
| 15:13:56 | bauzas | frickler: you wanna get that from an API call ? | |
| 15:14:14 | bauzas | frickler: because it's fairly simple to just DB query that if you don't cells | |
| 15:14:23 | bauzas | for Newton I mean of course | |
| 15:14:42 | mriedem | you can curl request to the placement endpoint | |
| 15:14:51 | mriedem | there are a few ways to skin this cat | |
| 15:14:55 | bauzas | as well | |
| 15:15:03 | bauzas | given you have a valid token of course | |
| 15:20:48 | frickler | yeah, so I guess I'll script something together with that | |
| 15:57:47 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Verify project id for flavor access calls https://review.openstack.org/435432 | |
| 16:20:48 | bauzas | reminder for non-English native bug reporters, please think of people who don't speak your language | |
| 16:20:50 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1666148 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova set-password instancesname return 409 error" [Undecided,New] | |
| 16:20:50 | bauzas | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1666148 | |
| 16:21:25 | bauzas | désolé, je ne parle pas le chinois et j'ai aussi essayé de googler | |
| 16:22:40 | bauzas | hah, that's just a google footer telling the bug reporter did translated automatically their report... | |
| 16:33:15 | openstackgerrit | Pushkar Umaranikar proposed openstack/nova master: Placement api: set custom json_error_formatter in resource_class https://review.openstack.org/430463 | |
| 16:34:25 | openstackgerrit | Pushkar Umaranikar proposed openstack/nova master: Placement api: set custom json_error_formatter in resource_class https://review.openstack.org/430463 | |
| 16:43:00 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: WIP: Remove deprecated image commands/API bindings https://review.openstack.org/436494 | |
| 16:59:14 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove deprecated image commands/API bindings https://review.openstack.org/436494 | |
| 17:04:05 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove deprecated image commands/API bindings https://review.openstack.org/436494 | |
| 18:31:32 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Verify project id for flavor access calls https://review.openstack.org/435432 | |
| 18:54:16 | diana_clarke | mriedem: Have you seen any patches go by to fix these warnings? They're getting really annoying ;) http://paste.openstack.org/show/598407/ | |
| 18:54:24 | diana_clarke | (If not, I can look into it) | |
| 18:55:52 | mriedem | diana_clarke: no, i think it's actually an issue in the openrc created in devstack | |
| 18:55:57 | mriedem | i assume it's setting OS_TENANT_ID | |
| 18:56:44 | diana_clarke | mriedem: Okie dokie. I'll look into it then. I just assumed someone else probably got to it already, but perhaps not. | |
| 19:10:53 | dansmith | alaski: just thought you might want to know.. I just started the first ever instance in a second cell(v2) | |
| 19:11:30 | gmann | gibi: bauzas I am ok to add that tests in tempest but few inline comment and yes we can reduced the testing bits if that really saving time and resource - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374887/12 | |
| 19:11:31 | melwitt | dansmith: did you have to do anything more than the cell-aware compute node get? | |
| 19:12:01 | dansmith | melwitt: yes, lots | |