Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-16
19:51:22 dansmith mriedem: _I_ don't like that
19:51:25 mriedem oh
19:51:30 melwitt we both don't like it
19:51:33 dansmith I asked so someone could say "fuck no"
19:51:43 melwitt heh
19:52:21 mriedem was that "(1:17:41 PM) dansmith: melwitt: yeah, well, glad we agree on that, I'd like to rule that out right here and now :)" ?
19:52:29 dansmith yeah
19:52:36 mriedem because you were also talking about stashing the mapping in the context or the instance at the same time
19:52:50 dansmith yeah, but I meant the param thing
19:53:04 jaypipes mriedem, dansmith, cdent, edleafe, johnthetubaguy, bauzas, melwitt: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/decision-finding-shared-inventory
19:54:26 jaypipes mriedem, dansmith, cdent, edleafe, johnthetubaguy, bauzas, melwitt: feel free to vote and leave comments... adding that to the scheduler/placement session discussions at PTG
19:54:32 cdent jaypipes: thank you for writing that up. will digest properly tomorrow morning, unless I'm suddenly overcome with desire to think about it now (which is somewhat likely)
19:55:56 mriedem that bile yellow color hurts my eyes
19:56:38 jaypipes mriedem: then lucky for you you didn't see the shirt I was wearing this morning. cdent is still recovering.
19:56:45 cdent jaypipes: for completeness could you add a bit more info on why that particular question needs to be asked?
19:56:58 jaypipes cdent: yuppers.
19:56:59 cdent yeah, I'm going to have nightmares tonight. the combo is...
19:57:01 jaypipes cdent: will do.
19:57:07 mriedem were the nipples cut out?
19:57:23 mriedem because if so, sign me up
19:57:30 jaypipes mriedem: lol
19:57:52 mriedem dansmith: so it sounds like stashing the targeted context is the plan?
19:58:19 dansmith mriedem: potentially, until I find some reason to hate that more
19:58:27 cdent mriedem: great, thanks. I'm totally broken now.
20:00:05 mriedem i'm trying to think of an operatoin where we could have multiple instances in different cells
20:00:10 mriedem but i don't think that's possible right now
20:00:20 dansmith mriedem: it's not now for sure,
20:00:39 mriedem what apis take multiple instances anyway?
20:00:39 dansmith mriedem: and I was thinking of migrations of some sort, but that'll clearly require some special handling anyway
20:00:53 dansmith well, the events api, which is why I said what I did, but that one is already handles
20:00:55 dansmith *handled
20:01:03 mriedem ok
20:01:34 mriedem maybe we'll revive that spec to expose quiesce in the api for multiple instances, which could all be in different cells
20:01:36 mriedem :)
20:01:51 mriedem haha
20:06:17 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Verify project_id when quotas are checked https://review.openstack.org/435010
20:11:56 mriedem sdague: your spec update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/435016/ looks good to me
20:12:04 openstackgerrit Yuming Ma proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova BFV by reserving volume https://review.openstack.org/417541
20:12:07 mriedem it does clarify the logic
20:13:54 sdague it seems to be working on the happy paths, I'll need to put some other real testing in place to test the rest of the cases
20:17:55 openstackgerrit Yuming Ma proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova BFV by reserving volume https://review.openstack.org/417541
20:39:08 openstackgerrit Yuming Ma proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova BFV by reserving volume https://review.openstack.org/417541
20:40:21 mriedem anyone aware of a way to basically squash a series of changes into a single patch using git format-patch?
20:40:31 mriedem without first doing a git rebase to squash them into a single commit
20:42:16 mriedem nvm thanks google http://stackoverflow.com/questions/616556/how-do-you-squash-commits-into-one-patch-with-git-format-patch
20:46:33 cdent edleafe: you the light blue on jay's etherpad? I think we're running into similar mental blocks :(
20:46:44 edleafe dat's me
20:51:34 mriedem nova meeting in 9 minutes
20:59:42 openstackgerrit Maciej Szankin proposed openstack/nova master: Tests: remove .testrepository/times.dbm in tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/435111
21:00:14 mriedem it's time
21:35:52 openstack bug 1644248 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "Nova incorrectly tracks live migration progress" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1644248 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
21:35:52 cfriesen mriedem: you had proposed that I send in a stable/newton release note for bug 1644248....what's the process for that given that there won't be an equivalent commit in master or stable/ocata?
21:36:44 mriedem cfriesen: just commit a release note to stable/newton with the known issue listed
21:37:39 cfriesen mriedem: okay, can do
21:42:11 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy https://review.openstack.org/391288
21:59:10 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count resources to check quota for cells https://review.openstack.org/416521
22:00:31 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.42 - Fix tag attribute disappearing https://review.openstack.org/429512
22:02:17 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.43: List/Show all server migration types https://review.openstack.org/430839
22:02:29 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.43 - Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/406707
22:02:43 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make servers API use cell-targeted context https://review.openstack.org/433362
22:02:49 dansmith melwitt: surprisingly little drama with unit and functional ^
22:02:56 dansmith we'll see how devstack likes it
22:04:41 melwitt dansmith: yeah, that's almost no change to the unit and functional. huh.
22:05:05 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: power_on/off and reboot https://review.openstack.org/427380
22:05:19 dansmith well, it kinda makes sense since I'm just making the set call a no-op for the simple cell fixture
22:05:22 dansmith although I'm surprised a bunch of functional tests didn't fail
22:05:26 dansmith but we'll see
22:06:19 melwitt yeah
22:06:20 mriedem bauzas: got it for you https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433855/
22:08:43 bauzas mriedem: heh
22:09:05 bauzas anyway, I promised a comment
22:12:02 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova master: Change tags to default field in Instance object. https://review.openstack.org/415298
22:12:55 cfriesen dansmith: regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265282/ if we remove the "name" and "id" from the flavor details, do we just display all of the flavor info when doing "nova list --fields flavor"? Currently it shows just the flavor ID.
22:21:44 zzfoo Unable to acquire lock on `/opt/stack/data/nova/instances/locks/nova-fd2836e4eef36d5483a37a5000a42a72fb95ea7c` due to [Errno 37] No locks available
22:21:44 zzfoo Hi, I'm trying to get live migration working. I have shared store setup and working with NFS though when i do a live migrate I get the following error in the nova-compute logs: error:
22:22:09 cfriesen does anyone know why I'm not getting an auto-generated Change-Id when creating a python-novaclient commit? Is this expected or did I mess something up?
22:22:25 zzfoo on the shared storage though that file has been created.
22:22:49 melwitt cfriesen: not expected. did you 'git review -s' first after you cloned python-novaclient?
22:23:07 melwitt you have to do it anytime you clone a new rep, afaik
22:23:10 melwitt *repo
22:23:19 cfriesen melwitt: it's entirely possible that I didn't
22:24:13 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: localdisk https://review.openstack.org/409401
22:24:51 melwitt cfriesen: you can try 'git review -s' in the repo dir, then 'git commit --amend' and then you should get a change-id
22:25:12 cfriesen melwitt: that seems to have done it. thanks
22:32:28 EmilienM mriedem: I took the freedom to write some thoughts on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ocata-retrospective - I'll probably have more later
22:32:56 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support for showing flavor details (v2.43) https://review.openstack.org/435141
22:33:50 mriedem EmilienM: ok, i expected it :)
22:40:10 mriedem hmm, what runs qemu-img info in a periodic?
22:40:16 mriedem get_available_resources?
22:42:15 cfriesen seems likely
22:42:29 mriedem so, i've seen this a few times lately,
22:42:39 mriedem the live migration job fails because we timeout waiting for an instance to spawn
22:42:43 mriedem and we get here http://logs.openstack.org/50/435050/1/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/49adcde/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_2017-02-16_22_22_11_143
22:42:51 mriedem 2017-02-16 22:22:11.143 14954 DEBUG nova.virt.libvirt.driver [req-025bf4d2-e5ba-4236-a334-f9eb98105ada tempest-LiveBlockMigrationTestJSON-793129345 tempest-LiveBlockMigrationTestJSON-793129345] [instance: 0ee93807-d206-4ddf-878c-efd1dd2eab3c] Instance is running spawn /opt/stack/new/nova/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py:2689
22:43:01 mriedem which calls spawn() on the libvirt driver
22:43:11 mriedem and after that, it's radio silence on that instance and request except for periodic tasks
22:43:26 mriedem i have a feeling we have some kind of deadlock or something in the libvirt driver's spawn flow
22:43:37 mriedem i've seen it since newton
22:47:37 cfriesen so you're thinking self._domain.createWithFlags() is triggering something wonky?
22:48:36 cfriesen or is there another async call before that?

Earlier   Later