Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-09
15:34:35 ianychoi mriedem, both: stable version craeation on Zanata & translation sync job for stablr branch
15:34:47 mriedem ok
15:34:50 EmilienM dansmith: we can't make this change at this stage of this cycle, we'll only do nova compute for now and if things work let's ship it in ocata and improve it in pike
15:34:56 sdague dansmith: ++
15:35:01 kashyap mriedem: I'll assume that fix wasn't backported to Mitaka, as it's security-only. Hence you must've down a downstream backport
15:35:20 mriedem kashyap: i think the L3 guys are working with the customer on the backport to their systems on mitaka
15:35:27 mriedem which....they could have screwed up for all i know
15:35:31 mriedem i've been trying to stay out of it
15:35:39 EmilienM dansmith: what you're asking has too much impact on different areas and we need to address it without stress & pressure (outside release week)
15:35:51 ianychoi mriedem, I am responsible for submitting a patch like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429409/ to support translation sync with stable branches also the cration for stable versions in Zanata
15:35:55 sdague mordred: did you figure out what cloud provided the keystone / az bug?
15:35:58 ianychoi (as I18n PTL)
15:36:04 sdague mordred: I mean keypair
15:36:20 mriedem ianychoi: ok
15:36:22 dansmith EmilienM: your call, but just seems like a recipe for other issues
15:36:31 ianychoi mriedem, by the way, auggy is still I18n - nova cross project liaison? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#I18n
15:37:14 EmilienM dansmith: in other words: "yes you're right but I don't have the time to do it now, the list of items to address your requests is to big if we want to release Ocata before the deadline"
15:37:29 ianychoi I know that some information on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#I18n seems old. I would like to update it as much as possible now
15:38:08 mriedem auggy: are you still i18n liaison?
15:38:25 mordred sdague: just responded to the bug asking that question
15:38:48 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Use admin context to create neutron ports https://review.openstack.org/357540
15:40:20 ianychoi Hmm.. no response now but so fine, since we are living with different timezone :)
15:41:11 ianychoi mriedem, then.. would it be fine if I create stable-ocata version in Zanata and support translation sync job with stable/ocata branch around release date?
15:41:44 ianychoi If there would be more concern (e.g., more early period), please tell me.
15:44:33 cdent macsz: looks like Eric is fixing that himself, yeah? Ought to be a one line fix (not counting tests). Thanks for finding that.
15:45:38 macsz macsz: yeah, just wanted to keep you posted, as the timeline for fixing anything crucial (if it has any chance to land for RC2) is rather short
15:46:43 cdent macsz: Do you think that should warrant a backport? It's not breaking anything too badly, is it?
15:48:18 mordred sdague: I have an unconfirmed hunch that it's fujitsu - the bug reporter has some other github repos related to the fujitsu-k5 cloud
15:48:27 mordred sdague: https://github.com/JonTheNiceGuy/k5-ansible-modules "As K5 is Availability Zone centric new modules were created to communicate with K5 which then bypass limitations in the Ansible Openstack os modules."
15:48:35 mriedem ianychoi: i'm fine with that, we just won't hold up the nova ocata rc2 on translations
15:48:36 macsz cdent: it isn't breaking anything, to be frank, rather just the error is not stated correctly, but it is also a really small change with impact close to 0
15:48:54 sdague mordred: ok, so crazy upstream fork that does something different with az
15:49:00 mordred yup
15:49:05 sdague I bet they are doing one of those fake federated models
15:49:15 sdague where the az is really a whole other openstack deploy
15:49:22 cdent macsz: I'm not the expert on these things (/me looks at mriedem ) but I reckon that breaking something is probably a reasonab bar at this point?
15:49:33 macsz cdent: i guess
15:49:45 macsz cdent: well, let's just leave it :)
15:49:50 mordred sdague: yah. there are people who can't get past the fact that in openstack the word "region" means what the word "az" means in amazon
15:50:02 mordred like it REALLY drives them completely batty
15:50:29 ianychoi mriedem, I see thanks! I will create stable-ocata version for nova and support translation sync around your rc3 or final release, but it would be much better if nova-i18n liaison will notify rc3 and final release to me :)
15:51:03 sdague mordred: yeh, well, we do have a lot of non overlapping grouping constructs that are weird
15:51:10 mordred we do for sure
15:51:18 mordred but making a fork which redefines them doesn't really help anybody
15:51:24 sdague mordred: ++
15:53:54 mriedem ianychoi: to be clear, we have rc1 now, and are working to rc2 by 2/16
15:54:02 mriedem ianychoi: so i don't plan on an rc3
15:55:07 ianychoi mriedem, thanks than I will consider with nova rc2 rather than rc3
15:56:12 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: live-mig: Add claims and proper resource tracking https://review.openstack.org/244489
15:56:15 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: pass libvirt reference methods to migration https://review.openstack.org/328997
15:56:17 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: live-migrate updates NUMA and cpus in the XML https://review.openstack.org/286744
15:56:58 mordred sdague: yup. verified. I have responded, hopefully in such a way as to not make the dude hate me too much
16:00:48 sfinucan johnthetubaguy: I forget - are we killing the feature that uses these opts? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323313/13/nova/conf/libvirt.py
16:01:11 sfinucan ...or was that something else
16:01:45 pkoniszewski avolkov: hey, are you around?
16:04:12 mriedem sfinucan: this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429798
16:04:31 sfinucan mriedem: Aye, that's the one
16:04:59 avolkov pkoniszewski hi
16:05:35 pkoniszewski avolkov: could you briefly describe what you have changed in the lm claims patch?
16:06:19 avolkov I just rebased, main change is service version from 16 to 17, because of placement api
16:06:28 pkoniszewski ah, okay
16:06:49 pkoniszewski asking whether i need to change something in my local changes
16:06:54 pkoniszewski still working on rollback issue
16:11:46 pkoniszewski avolkov: thanks a lot of this! will save me some time :)
16:11:54 pkoniszewski for this
16:12:36 mriedem sdague: i've got all of those backports up https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ice78a0982bcce491f0c9690903ed2c6b6aaab1be,n,z
16:15:46 mriedem ildikov: smcginnis: for the nova/cinder meeting today i mostly wanted to just talk about PTG planning
16:16:00 smcginnis mriedem: +1
16:16:04 mriedem we know the local.conf passthrough in infra is already on the infra agenda
16:16:10 mriedem for testing with cinder v3
16:16:26 ildikov mriedem: sounds good
16:16:47 ildikov mriedem: I talked to the infra guys briefly about that patch, they were very positive about the progress
16:18:01 mriedem johnthetubaguy: on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429798/ is the live migration progress timeout mostly just an issue for live block migrations?
16:18:14 pkoniszewski mriedem: for all of them
16:19:02 ildikov mriedem: can we at some point look into the remove check_attach patch too?
16:19:21 pkoniszewski its just wrong, doesnt matter whether it is block live migration or live migration
16:19:25 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Placement api: set custom json_error_formatter in allocations https://review.openstack.org/395194
16:19:52 ildikov mriedem: I need to figure out one notification test failure, but it would be great to have the other parts figured out too so we can merge it and finally move on
16:20:02 sdague mriedem: bam!
16:20:13 mriedem ildikov: yeah i was just looking it up
16:20:14 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.remove_host notification https://review.openstack.org/396211
16:20:14 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform aggregate.add_host notification https://review.openstack.org/396210
16:20:33 ildikov mriedem: cool, tnx
16:20:59 mriedem sdague: thanks
16:25:25 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform missing delete notifications https://review.openstack.org/410297
16:26:47 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I think its technically a problem for all live-migrations
16:26:55 johnthetubaguy mriedem: but the block migrations have it worse
16:27:10 johnthetubaguy mriedem: heh, what pkoniszewski said
16:29:05 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove **kwargs passing in payload __init__ https://review.openstack.org/418489
16:29:05 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor InstancePayload creation https://review.openstack.org/418488
16:29:16 mriedem johnthetubaguy: ok, +W
16:29:25 mriedem johnthetubaguy: i've also sent a heads up to the operators list
16:29:46 johnthetubaguy mriedem: awesome, thanks
16:29:58 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I can get the backport in the queue to speed that up
16:30:47 mriedem johnthetubaguy: already done
16:31:06 johnthetubaguy oh. cool, thanks
16:39:42 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Rework get_number_of_serial_ports https://review.openstack.org/407174
16:39:42 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Rework '_get_cpu_topology_constraints' https://review.openstack.org/407173
16:39:43 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Log when conflicting image/flavor metadata found https://review.openstack.org/407175
16:48:12 auggy mriedem: if someone else wanted to do the i18n liaison they could. There really wasn't anything to do.

Earlier   Later