Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-02
17:46:00 mriedem mdbooth: i'm going through your nfs mount patch now
17:46:05 mriedem mdbooth: so don't drop off yet
17:46:09 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/428285
17:46:14 alex_xu mriedem: ^ done
17:46:18 mriedem thanks
17:46:21 openstackgerrit Maciej Szankin proposed openstack/nova master: conf: mark glance.api_servers opt as required https://review.openstack.org/428241
17:46:24 alex_xu np
17:46:38 dansmith melwitt: yeah, I think we should be good there
17:47:24 melwitt sweet
17:53:46 johnthetubaguy jaypipes: the joys!
17:54:06 johnthetubaguy jaypipes: I have a concern on this ironic patch still: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404472
17:54:25 johnthetubaguy jaypipes: but something tells me I am miss understanding the resource tracker sequence
17:55:17 diana_clarke sfinucan: thanks a bunch for reviewing that!
18:02:24 sfinucan diana_clarke: np :)
18:02:25 mriedem mdbooth: lyarwood: before i go further, some comments/questions inline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383859/13/nova/virt/libvirt/volume/mount.py
18:09:43 BobBall johnthetubaguy / mriedem FYI I believe https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428180/ will fix the Citrix XenServer CI
18:10:26 mriedem cool
18:10:28 BobBall johnthetubaguy / mriedem: A dodgy Cinder commit meant that "older" versions of pvs would all fail (as they don't have the newly required option) - the check for the version was broken.
18:11:11 BobBall We will monitor the CI after this cinder commit is merged and let you know the results and when we'd like to re-start voting.
18:11:16 mriedem sure
18:11:31 openstackgerrit Maciej Szankin proposed openstack/nova master: conf: resolved TODOs in compute configuration https://review.openstack.org/426793
18:11:43 mriedem i guess if LVM.supports_pvs_ignoreskippedcluster was just set to False
18:11:56 mriedem because of the old pvs
18:12:05 mriedem *lvm
18:13:03 BobBall Actually it was always returning true... LVM.supports_pvs_ignoreskippedcluster was *meant* to be reading a property with a method behind it (using self.supportsXXX) but LVM.supportsXXX is the method itself so that was not None.
18:13:11 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add step-by-step examples for Cells V2 setup https://review.openstack.org/427981
18:13:13 BobBall oh sorr I mis-read.
18:13:33 BobBall Couldn't "set" it because it's just a method on the class
18:20:29 mriedem mdbooth: lyarwood: done with that review, only real questions are in that mount module
18:21:20 jaypipes johnthetubaguy: +W from me on you disk_gb patch.
18:28:53 openstack Launchpad bug 1659266 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Disk allocation for instance is not good with swap" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Tanvir Talukder (tanvirt16)
18:28:53 mriedem is anyone working a fix for this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1659266
18:29:18 mriedem bauzas: ^ you reported it
18:29:29 EmilienM 2 questions :
18:29:53 mriedem (1) who is your daddy and (2) what does he do?
18:29:53 EmilienM 1. Where [cells] section needs to be configured (on which services, eg: nova-api? etc)
18:30:04 mriedem EmilienM: cells config is only for cells v1
18:30:06 mriedem you don't care about it
18:30:14 EmilienM 2. Do we *need* cells/enable= true in Ocata,
18:30:17 mriedem no
18:30:19 EmilienM amoralej: ^
18:30:27 mriedem [cells] is all about cells v1
18:30:44 EmilienM mriedem: ok
18:30:49 amoralej thanks mriedem
18:30:55 EmilienM yeah thx
18:31:01 mriedem i'll update the config option help to make that more clear
18:31:09 EmilienM mriedem: we're unable to spawn VMs anymore
18:31:28 EmilienM maybe you'll know why
18:31:47 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/15/424915/8/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-centos-7/b29f35b/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-02-02_12_57_00_754
18:32:16 amoralej mriedem, we getg "Instance 6a26cec0-3769-44b6-851c-b77359897e07 could not be found." kind of errors in certain tempest tests
18:32:38 EmilienM mriedem: we're deploying trunk
18:32:41 EmilienM with UC
18:33:17 johnthetubaguy jaypipes: thanks!
18:35:56 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Clarify the [cells] config option help https://review.openstack.org/428344
18:35:57 mriedem melwitt: dansmith: ^
18:37:06 mriedem EmilienM: that trace says the bdm is invalid
18:37:37 EmilienM bdm?
18:37:40 mriedem EmilienM: because the volume isn't found http://logs.openstack.org/15/424915/8/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-centos-7/b29f35b/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-02-02_12_56_57_274
18:37:45 mriedem bdm == block_device_mapping
18:37:48 EmilienM Block Device Mapping
18:37:49 EmilienM ok
18:38:01 EmilienM well, it worked yesterday
18:38:13 mriedem EmilienM: did it work with devstack? :P
18:38:19 openstack bug 1659266 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Disk allocation for instance is not good with swap" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1659266 - Assigned to Tanvir Talukder (tanvirt16)
18:38:19 johnthetubaguy mriedem: I can put something up for that bug 1659266
18:38:26 mriedem johnthetubaguy: thanks
18:38:30 EmilienM mriedem: I was about to say it but well...
18:38:38 johnthetubaguy I have to run, soon, but lets see what can be done
18:38:50 mriedem johnthetubaguy: you're not allowed to leave
18:38:55 mriedem sally will understand
18:38:55 EmilienM mriedem: FYI we're delaying TripleO release because upgrades are not working currently from Newton to Ocata
18:39:07 EmilienM mriedem: we hope to solve blockers by next week :/
18:39:14 johnthetubaguy mriedem: you haven't met the conductor, she is scary
18:41:15 mriedem EmilienM: my wild guess would be something related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427782/
18:41:22 mriedem which merged last night
18:41:33 mriedem EmilienM: but would also mean you don't have things setup for cells v2
18:42:07 EmilienM mriedem: do you run experimental job sometimes?
18:42:12 EmilienM it seems like you're not
18:42:44 EmilienM mriedem: I think we are pretty well covered for cells v2 but I'll need to confirm
18:43:00 diana_clarke EmilienM: I've run it, but I've yet to see it pass ;(
18:43:28 EmilienM diana_clarke: where?
18:43:48 diana_clarke EmilienM: for example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420186/
18:44:10 diana_clarke (it's not recent, but people are running it)
18:44:52 EmilienM diana_clarke: cool
18:46:49 dansmith I run it too on occasion, but it takes a long time, fails often, and the logs are harder to sift through
18:47:03 EmilienM dansmith: ping me when it fails
18:47:06 EmilienM I'm happy to help
18:47:26 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Stop swap allocations being wrong due to MB vs GB https://review.openstack.org/428352
18:48:07 EmilienM dansmith: any idea about my bug mentioned above ^
18:48:33 dansmith EmilienM: I looked a bit earlier, but I saw no debug logs to help track anything down
18:49:27 EmilienM dansmith: no debug on http://logs.openstack.org/15/424915/8/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-centos-7/b29f35b/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-02-02_12_56_57_274 ?
18:49:32 johnthetubaguy jaypipes: mriedem: its a quick cut and refactor from the previous fix, hopefully, at least thats what the unit tests suggested: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428352
18:49:58 EmilienM dansmith: could it be related to cells again?
18:50:05 dansmith EmilienM: no, I was looking at another run that had no debug, periodic maybe?
18:50:21 EmilienM dansmith: yeah periodic but this one has debug ^
18:51:24 dansmith EmilienM: ah, I hadn't seen that volume error, and no that's not cells related AFAIK
18:51:57 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Stop swap allocations being wrong due to MB vs GB https://review.openstack.org/428352
18:52:05 EmilienM dansmith: could it be related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427782/ ?
18:52:55 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: hack ironic with resource providers https://review.openstack.org/426296
18:53:44 dansmith EmilienM: not the volume error for sure no

Earlier   Later