| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-02-02 | |||
| 13:05:19 | lyarwood | mdbooth: thanks, I'll wait for dansmith and mriedem to come online before I recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427267/ again | |
| 13:08:11 | mdbooth | johnthetubaguy: Do you think you'll get around to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383859/ before release? Fixes NFS, and makes doing the same for other filesystem-backed drivers trivial. See glusterfs follow-on for eg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423402/ | |
| 13:08:13 | gcb | sfinucan, mriedem: As I know we have been preparing for final octata release, Can we still merge python 3 unit tests patches now ? | |
| 13:09:00 | mdbooth | johnthetubaguy: So the NFS change is somewhat complex because it includes infrastructure applicable to all filesystem-backed volume backends. | |
| 13:09:16 | sfinucan | gcb: They're pretty low risk (unit test only) but I think we're only accepting critical bugfixes and doc patches at the moment | |
| 13:09:23 | mdbooth | It's pretty well tested, though. | |
| 13:09:38 | sfinucan | The Pike window will be open tomorrow though | |
| 13:10:02 | mdbooth | It's a bug. Are we passed the bugfix window? | |
| 13:10:10 | mdbooth | past | |
| 13:10:33 | mdbooth | That said, if I can get it into Pike I'll take it and propose for backport. | |
| 13:10:49 | mdbooth | I just want to land the damned thing. | |
| 13:11:13 | gcb | sfinucan: thanks, got it. The only two patches to make all unit tests work on Python 3.5 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1482633 | |
| 13:11:28 | gcb | it's okay to make them merge into Pike :) | |
| 13:11:51 | sfinucan | gcb: Perfect. I'll take a look tomorrow or Monday :) Will be good to get that all closed off | |
| 13:12:21 | gcb | sfinucan: cool, thanks | |
| 13:18:21 | sfinucan | johnthetubaguy: Took a gawk. Makes sense to me | |
| 13:24:33 | jaypipes | morning folks | |
| 13:24:35 | bauzas | mriedem: FWIW, we have another related problem | |
| 13:24:57 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1659266 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Disk allocation for instance is not good with swap" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Tanvir Talukder (tanvirt16) | |
| 13:24:57 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1659266 | |
| 13:25:10 | bauzas | but fixing that could be difficult given we already have allocations | |
| 13:25:17 | sfinucan | trinaths: Not sure if you got a response to your question or not. Have you tried building an instance with a NUMA topology but without hugepages? | |
| 13:28:10 | mriedem | gcb: sfinucan: mdbooth: we shouldn't be putting things into the gate or check queue that don't need to be, py3 unit test cleanup included | |
| 13:28:41 | sfinucan | mriedem: Morning. That's what we thought | |
| 13:28:57 | gcb | mriedem: ack | |
| 13:31:32 | mdbooth | lyarwood: I'm just going to grab coffee. Want to talk about swap_volume in a few minutes? | |
| 13:31:43 | lyarwood | mdbooth: sure | |
| 13:31:48 | mriedem | bauzas: is that related to the thing that johnthetubaguy has a patch up for? | |
| 13:32:06 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428120/ | |
| 13:32:47 | sfinucan | mriedem, bauzas: That's the one, yes | |
| 13:33:04 | bauzas | mriedem: not really but the same problme | |
| 13:33:20 | bauzas | mriedem: honestly, MHO is that we should not use GBs for disk resources but rather bytes | |
| 13:33:37 | bauzas | or KB | |
| 13:33:43 | bauzas | if that's too big | |
| 13:33:54 | bauzas | but, we have lots of ceilings like the one I wrote | |
| 13:34:11 | mriedem | dansmith: melwitt: hmm, lyarwood's patch failed in the gate on the cells inst delete/create race thing http://logs.openstack.org/67/427267/2/gate/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/e4e67b3/console.html#_2017-02-02_11_48_07_755243 | |
| 13:34:28 | bauzas | mriedem: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py#L148 | |
| 13:34:49 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427782/ | |
| 13:35:07 | mriedem | which merged at 7:34pm | |
| 13:35:29 | mriedem | and lyarwood's change failed at 2017-02-02 11:48:07.755243 | |
| 13:35:51 | lyarwood | mriedem: twice, I think the previous run also hit this a few hours before that | |
| 13:36:07 | mriedem | lyarwood: well i could see it hitting before the other fix was merged, | |
| 13:36:14 | mriedem | but i'm worried if it hit after the fix was merged | |
| 13:36:37 | mriedem | i think ES is backed up too so we probably can't tell if the hits have dropped off after the fix merged | |
| 13:36:49 | mriedem | yeah we can't tell http://status.openstack.org//elastic-recheck/index.html | |
| 13:36:52 | mriedem | everything is backed up | |
| 13:37:25 | lyarwood | mriedem: http://logs.openstack.org/67/427267/2/gate/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/cc0ed47/console.html#_2017-02-02_05_45_00_341186 was the other hit | |
| 13:39:18 | mriedem | yeah that's before the fix was merged | |
| 13:39:21 | mriedem | so not a surprise | |
| 13:39:32 | mriedem | but failing 3 hours after the merge worries me | |
| 13:39:41 | lyarwood | mriedem: ah did it land at 7:34am? | |
| 13:39:47 | mriedem | pm | |
| 13:39:51 | lyarwood | mriedem: you said pm above | |
| 13:39:58 | lyarwood | mriedem: that's 05:45am | |
| 13:40:02 | mriedem | oh yeah | |
| 13:40:12 | lyarwood | anyway | |
| 13:41:18 | nmathew- | hi all | |
| 13:41:35 | nmathew- | can anybody point to a material on flavors | |
| 13:41:38 | mriedem | lyarwood: apparently the times in the zuul log don't match up with what's in the gerrit ui | |
| 13:41:55 | mriedem | nmathew-: http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/compute-flavors.html | |
| 13:42:00 | mriedem | docs.o.o has a search box | |
| 13:44:07 | nmathew- | mriedem, say I not enabling hugepages in flavors, I can stil enable that by kernel parameters to that vm kernel | |
| 13:44:31 | nmathew- | mriedem, what is the difference between specifying in flavors and not specifying in flavors? | |
| 13:44:54 | lyarwood | nmathew-: see the topic, if you have questions like that #openstack is a better place to ask :) | |
| 13:45:17 | nmathew- | ok | |
| 13:45:25 | nmathew- | oh sorry | |
| 13:45:33 | lyarwood | nmathew-: np at all | |
| 13:46:06 | mriedem | so looking at my fix for the delete/create race bug, | |
| 13:46:07 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427775/1/nova/conductor/manager.py | |
| 13:46:23 | mriedem | i see that debug log message hit 3 times in the n-cond logs on a run of that patch http://logs.openstack.org/75/427775/1/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/c906c15/logs/screen-n-cond.txt.gz#_2017-02-01_16_14_03_273 | |
| 13:46:31 | mriedem | so it's obviously catching the issue | |
| 13:46:51 | mriedem | dansmith: bauzas: ^ so i'm thinking we should probably just get that in given the time | |
| 13:53:10 | cdent | mriedem: unless you're already on it, I'll fix the nits in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427367 | |
| 13:53:48 | mriedem | i'll get it quick | |
| 13:55:41 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: add upgrade notes to the placement devref https://review.openstack.org/427367 | |
| 13:55:42 | mriedem | sfinucan: bauzas: ^ fixed the typo | |
| 13:56:20 | bauzas | mriedem: okay, let's merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427775/1 then | |
| 13:57:23 | sfinucan | mriedem: Job. Done. | |
| 13:57:26 | mriedem | i wonder if it would be better to destroy the build request right before creating the instance? | |
| 13:57:53 | mriedem | but, i don't really want to ponder that today | |
| 13:58:17 | bauzas | mriedem: possibly | |
| 13:58:24 | bauzas | mriedem: the main issue I see here is timing | |
| 13:58:45 | bauzas | so let's merge your change is quite impactless and think about the best approach for Pike | |
| 14:00:41 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: FWIW, I think its best to create the instance first, so we don't "loose" the instance, although marking the build request in someway that stops deletes might make sense, maybe thats the cell mapping entry? | |
| 14:01:24 | johnthetubaguy | hmm, I can't 100% remember the ordering now | |
| 14:02:07 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: this one the openstack ansible folks I spotted feels nasty, but we totally could back port it later, I believe | |
| 14:02:47 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428120/ right? | |
| 14:02:50 | mriedem | i left some comments in there | |
| 14:03:00 | mriedem | there is a bug report i think that fits the same thing already | |
| 14:03:03 | mriedem | i've marked it rc1 | |
| 14:06:36 | alex_xu | johnthetubaguy: I think gmann is right on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428071, we agreed on we have filter which match the name in the API representation, but that will be done in the future with microversion. | |
| 14:11:54 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: the bug is different I think, the bug talks about the allocation, this my bug is about the inventory (due to the reservation) | |
| 14:12:09 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1661258 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Deleted ironic node has an inventory in nova_api database" [Undecided,New] | |
| 14:12:09 | jroll | mriedem: fyi this one looks fun https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1661258 | |
| 14:13:41 | mriedem | jroll: damn | |
| 14:13:52 | jroll | it might actually be easy | |
| 14:13:53 | mriedem | jroll: will need cdent, edleafe and/or jaypipes to look at that one | |
| 14:14:02 | jroll | mriedem: thank you for pinging them :P | |
| 14:14:17 | mriedem | i was thinking the periodic update would remove the inventory for the removed node but vdrok said in the bug that it didn't | |
| 14:14:22 | cdent | joy | |