Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-01
23:03:03 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: placement: RT now adds proper Ironic inventory https://review.openstack.org/404472
23:03:14 edleafe jaypipes: mriedem: ^^ tests should be fixed now
23:03:24 jaypipes edleafe: ty ed!
23:06:40 mriedem can you list servers with a query parameter with a 'none' value, to make it equate to NULL in the db query, i.e. GET /servers/?terminated_at=none
23:06:41 mriedem ?
23:07:27 mriedem i guess let's find out
23:18:15 tonyb cdent, mriedem: who did the placement stuff in devstack? and is the placement implementation/upgrade from mitaka -> newton -> ocata in devref documented
23:19:04 mriedem tonyb: cdent did the devstack patches,
23:19:12 tonyb mriedem: okay
23:19:34 tonyb cdent: shoudl expect strange questions in his future
23:19:40 mriedem and http://docs-draft.openstack.org/67/427367/3/check/gate-nova-docs-ubuntu-xenial/de76755//doc/build/html/placement.html
23:19:43 mriedem for devref
23:19:56 mriedem see 'deployment' and 'upgrade notes'
23:20:37 tonyb Thanks!
23:21:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Fix the terminated_at field in the server query params schema https://review.openstack.org/427964
23:21:31 mriedem oomichi: gmann: alex_xu: Kevin_Zheng: ^
23:21:33 mriedem sdague: ^
23:21:53 mriedem fwiw, filtering instances by those datetime fields doesn't seem to work anyway
23:22:18 mriedem i have an instance created at 2017-02-01T23:14:26Z according to nova show, but nothing is returned from:
23:22:25 mriedem curl -s -H "X-Auth-Token: $OS_TOKEN" http://9.5.124.95:8774/v2.1/servers?created_at=2017-02-01T23:14:26Z
23:24:10 mriedem oh interesting it's a regex
23:24:11 mriedem curl -s -H "X-Auth-Token: $OS_TOKEN" http://9.5.124.95:8774/v2.1/servers?created_at=^2017-02-01.*
23:24:13 mriedem ^ works
23:29:50 armax mriedem: is the large ops job running for nova changes?
23:29:59 mriedem armax: the large ops job doesn't run anymore
23:30:03 mriedem as far as i know
23:30:09 armax mriedem: ok, thanks for confirming this
23:30:13 mriedem which reminds me, i was going to kill that stuff from d-g
23:30:18 armax you mean https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228636/2/stackrc?
23:30:37 mriedem nope
23:30:47 mriedem there is some stuff in d-g about the large ops job
23:30:51 armax mriedem: ok
23:30:53 mriedem which i was going to clean out since we don't run that job anymore
23:31:15 armax what about that one? do we want to go back and keep a simpler API_WORKERS expression?
23:31:29 armax I am thinking of setting the minimum num of workers to 1
23:31:39 Kevin_Zheng mriedem: so you are suggesting separate Reno with API ref patch?
23:31:46 armax that cuts the amount of RSS memory per service quite a bit
23:32:00 armax and should give us some headroom at least for now
23:32:01 mriedem Kevin_Zheng: at this rate, i think we'll probably want to decouple the release note from the rest of that change
23:32:04 armax what do you reckon?
23:32:27 mriedem armax: maximum you mean?
23:32:51 mriedem right now default in devstack is nproc / 2 right?
23:33:10 Kevin_Zheng mriedem: ok, will do it, holiday is over :)
23:33:22 mriedem armax: btw, i'm pretty sure that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228636/ was all changed after that
23:33:53 mriedem although that was a long time ago so i might be mixed up on when those changes all happened, mtreinish might remember
23:34:29 mriedem Kevin_Zheng: cool. you'll probably want to check the comments/questions in parameters.yaml because it looks like some things are missing, but i might be confused about what's supposed to be in the server query parameter list
23:34:34 mriedem and if that's just sort keys or also filter keys
23:35:04 mriedem i assume that maybe some things were left out of the list in the api-ref if they are things that technically work but we don't want people using, like image_ref
23:35:08 mriedem gmann: ^
23:35:40 armax mriedem: the outcome of the expression really depends on the number of processors devstack runs in
23:36:07 mriedem armax: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/086232.html
23:36:16 mriedem for your historical enjoyment
23:36:20 Kevin_Zheng mriedem: ok
23:36:30 armax mriedem: thanks :)
23:37:01 armax mriedem: I am trying to figure out what’s the best strategy to set the API_WORKERS variable
23:37:26 mriedem armax: you should probably talk to sdague and mtreinish about that
23:37:35 mriedem since they were dealing with that heavily the last time we had an OOM issue
23:37:54 armax indeed, I was hoping I’d have a concrete proposal first
23:38:47 armax I don’t particularly fancy the idea of reducing the number of workers deliberately, but we’re in a bit of a bind
23:38:48 mriedem dude,
23:38:55 mriedem just wave your hands in the ML
23:39:14 mriedem maybe you'll hook someone :)
23:39:15 armax we did, but maybe not high enough
23:39:22 mriedem jump and wave at the same time
23:39:24 mriedem and scream
23:41:05 armax I’ll give it a shot
#openstack-nova - 2017-02-02
00:00:03 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Fix the terminated_at field in the server query params schema https://review.openstack.org/427964
00:05:03 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Handle NotImplementedError in _process_instance_vif_deleted_event https://review.openstack.org/427974
01:22:09 oomichi mriedem: cool, nice catch
01:31:22 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/427978
01:37:32 mriedem woot
01:37:32 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427782/ is merged
01:37:41 mriedem hopefully we see that bug drop off
01:38:03 mriedem the postgres fix is merged too https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427667/
01:40:08 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/427978
01:46:12 melwitt mriedem: I had forgotten I said I'd write up step-by-step examples for setting up cells v2, so I did it just now. do you think it's too late for that?
01:53:24 mriedem no
01:53:37 mriedem link?
01:53:43 mriedem we really needed some upgrade steps
01:53:46 mriedem but i'll take anything
01:53:52 melwitt yay good. one sec, getting some sphinx warnings
01:54:28 melwitt "Title level inconsistent" I'm trying to figure out what level is one step smaller than ~~~~~ for a section
01:59:15 mriedem ----- ?
01:59:56 mriedem melwitt: ^
02:00:02 mriedem Cells V2 ======== Manifesto ~~~~~~~~~ Proposal --------
02:00:13 melwitt yeah, I think you're right. thanks
02:03:17 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add step-by-step examples for Cells V2 setup https://review.openstack.org/427981
02:04:49 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/427978
02:04:53 melwitt mriedem: ^
02:05:22 gmann Kevin_Zheng: looks like you are back, updating doc patch as per mriedem comments ?
02:08:13 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Trivial Fix typo in schema https://review.openstack.org/427983
02:08:44 Kevin_Zheng gmann: yeah I'm trying to
02:09:33 gmann Kevin_Zheng: thanks, please let me know any help. we should get those last bits in this week
02:10:32 Kevin_Zheng gmann: sure
02:10:35 Kevin_Zheng Thanks
02:15:15 gmann Kevin_Zheng: terminated_at is fixed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427964/
02:15:55 Kevin_Zheng Yeah just saw it
02:16:23 gmann ok
02:20:42 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/426636
02:21:09 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Abort Cold Migration https://review.openstack.org/334732

Earlier   Later