Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-18
12:52:26 jaypipes wznoinsk: the folks with experience with that would more likely be in #openstack-snaps
12:52:40 wznoinsk jaypipes, oh ok, thanks
12:53:30 jaypipes wznoinsk: and good morning :)
12:54:38 wznoinsk jaypipes, good morning to you too, must be v. early one for you?
12:55:02 jaypipes wznoinsk: nah, not too bad. 7:50am
12:57:04 wznoinsk that peace and quiet time when everybody else hasn't woken up to bother you ;-) anyways, have a good one, I'm going for lunch myself
12:58:15 jaypipes sahid: make that 5 straight hours of meetings and PRs...
12:58:33 jaypipes wznoinsk: heh, remember I have 3 pugs that are *always* bothering me :)
12:58:53 sahid jaypipes: ok thanks jay, sorry to rush you on it but i'm little bit scrary with the ff comming
12:59:19 jaypipes sahid: understood. have you found more cores to look at the bottom two patches in that series? sfinucan maybe?
12:59:43 sahid jaypipes: he is in holidays this week
13:00:13 jaypipes sahid: ah. perhaps you can reach out to another core? maybe mriedem or sdague?
13:00:17 jaypipes or bauzas?
13:01:17 sahid jaypipes: yes sure i see dansmith commenting on one of the patch, then i remember johnthetubaguy interested on this feature and perhaps mriedem
13:01:28 alex_xu nova api meeting is running
13:01:44 jaypipes sahid: dansmith is out for a while (he's adventuring in Eastern Oregon in the mountains) :)
13:02:21 sahid oh i see
13:03:46 sahid johnthetubaguy, mriedem one of you guy have a moment to review the feature emulator threads ? it's basically reserving a pCPU to make running emulator threads
13:04:39 johnthetubaguy still recovering from a nasty bug, but starting to get through my review queue, I had hoped to get to that one
13:07:42 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add release note and docs for filter/sort whitelist https://review.openstack.org/421760
13:14:03 snikitin johnthetubaguy: Hi John! I heard that you are good in Xen. Could you add this xen related patch into your review queue, please? :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399613
13:49:13 EmilienM owalsh: hey! so I have quick updates about Placement service
13:49:24 owalsh EmilienM: shoot
13:49:28 EmilienM owalsh: the service was working fine in our CI (tripleo & puppet) a few days ago
13:49:32 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [py35] Fixes to get more tempest tests working https://review.openstack.org/421911
13:49:48 EmilienM owalsh: and I've noticed yesterday that nova-compute fails to register the resource again
13:49:49 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP] ignore me - trying experimental jobs https://review.openstack.org/421209
13:50:02 EmilienM it tries in loop though, but it doesn't work
13:50:15 EmilienM I tried to reproduce it locally but it worked, I'm a bit confused why it fails in CI
13:50:20 EmilienM I can provide logs
13:50:30 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/66/421366/1/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/f138bcc/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-01-17_17_45_52_920
13:50:49 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP] ignore me - trying experimental jobs https://review.openstack.org/421209
13:50:50 EmilienM cdent, bauzas ^ just fyi
13:51:59 owalsh EmilienM: hrmm, so it would suggest a timing issue, but it tries in a loop... for how long?
13:52:26 EmilienM owalsh: I don't think it's a timing issue this time but let me check
13:52:44 EmilienM owalsh: if you remember, the first time I reported this issue was because we didn't have this loop than dansmith did
13:52:54 EmilienM but now we have the loop and it still fails to register
13:53:39 markus_z mriedem: Did I clear up your doubts on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347471/ ? The test hook behaves as expected IMO.
13:54:14 EmilienM owalsh: I would like to find in logs where it tries to register is and the trace of failure
13:54:22 EmilienM owalsh: "Unable to refresh my resource provider record" is not enough
13:56:26 EmilienM owalsh: I'm creating a launchpad bug
14:00:03 EmilienM owalsh: do you see something weird in the nova.conf? https://paste.fedoraproject.org/529703/14847479/
14:00:49 gmann johnthetubaguy: alex_xu Kevin_Zheng +1 on putting sort_key one last on series
14:01:04 openstack Launchpad bug 1657467 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "placement: unable to refresh compute resource provider record" [Undecided,New]
14:01:04 EmilienM owalsh: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1657467
14:01:23 owalsh EmilienM: auth_urls is IPv6 loopback... does that work???
14:01:47 EmilienM owalsh: of course, why not?
14:02:04 alex_xu gmann: johnthetubaguy I guess for now, the policy one have more thing to do. maybe the policy one is last one
14:02:34 EmilienM owalsh: it works for all services like tha.
14:02:38 EmilienM that*
14:03:00 gmann alex_xu: but, sort_key ignore list seems controversial which might take time
14:03:13 johnthetubaguy alex_xu: yeah, what gmann said
14:03:55 gmann alex_xu: johnthetubaguy need to go to bed, ll check logs and patches tomorrow.
14:04:02 alex_xu gmann: johnthetubaguy ok, got it, that works for me
14:04:11 alex_xu gmann: see you tomorrow
14:04:32 owalsh EmilienM: just fishing for something that might differ from running locally
14:09:06 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 map_cell_and_hosts https://review.openstack.org/421420
14:09:06 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 map_instances https://review.openstack.org/421404
14:09:07 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 simple_cell_setup https://review.openstack.org/421333
14:09:07 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 verify_instance https://review.openstack.org/421436
14:09:08 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 delete_cell https://review.openstack.org/421459
14:09:08 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 map_cell0 https://review.openstack.org/421384
14:09:09 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 list_cells https://review.openstack.org/421458
14:09:09 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 discover_hosts https://review.openstack.org/421442
14:09:10 openstackgerrit Diana Clarke proposed openstack/nova: nova-manage docs: cell_v2 create_cell https://review.openstack.org/421444
14:09:30 eglynn cdent: are the placement API logs normally found under /logs/nova ?
14:10:01 cdent eglynn: the logs only show up after it has actually had its first request
14:10:12 cdent so if the resource-tracker can't see the service, it will never make a request
14:10:16 cdent and never make a log entry
14:10:46 eglynn a-ha, /me was wondering why none to be found under http://logs.openstack.org/66/421366/1/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/f138bcc/logs/nova
14:11:13 cdent it's one of the side effects of being hosted under mod-wsgi
14:11:52 jaypipes eglynn: heyo, how are you Eoghan? :)
14:11:55 takashin alex_xu: Could you review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408955/ again?
14:12:07 eglynn jaypipes: all good :) ... and you?
14:12:11 EmilienM eglynn, cdent: yes logs are in /var/log/nova
14:12:12 cdent eglynn, EmilienM : the presenting error "The placement API endpoint not found." suggests either that the rt can't reach keystone, or that keystone is not yet up to date
14:12:15 EmilienM they always were at least
14:12:24 jaypipes eglynn: busy as always, which is good :)
14:12:28 EmilienM cdent: it worked 2 days ago :(
14:12:31 eglynn indeed
14:12:35 EmilienM cdent: I can show you logs, a sec
14:13:33 EmilienM cdent: here are logs from 5 days ago:
14:13:35 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/66/420166/2/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/591bf96/logs/nova/
14:13:43 EmilienM you can see nova placement api log, and everything works
14:14:11 EmilienM we haven't changed anything on this topic https://github.com/openstack/puppet-nova/commits/master
14:15:18 cdent EmilienM: http://logs.openstack.org/66/420166/2/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/591bf96/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-01-13_21_20_29_245
14:16:00 EmilienM cdent: credentials are created by Puppet, we never changed that since December
14:16:12 EmilienM let me show the logs
14:16:14 cdent I don't dispute that
14:16:31 cdent all I'm saying is that the logs you pointed to me as being successful are saying they have bad credentials
14:16:35 EmilienM http://logs.openstack.org/66/420166/2/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/591bf96/logs/puppet-20170113_212224.txt.gz#_2017-01-13_21_21_14
14:16:44 cdent I don't know if that means anything or not
14:16:54 EmilienM they are created at 21:21:14
14:17:02 EmilienM and your log is at 21:20
14:17:25 EmilienM if you look later, it worked: http://logs.openstack.org/66/420166/2/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario004-tempest-centos-7/591bf96/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz#_2017-01-13_21_21_32_490
14:17:33 EmilienM so like I said, it worked on January 13th
14:17:36 EmilienM but not now
14:17:48 cdent I get it, I'm just trying to clarify the pieces
14:18:08 EmilienM something changed in Nova between January 13th and at least 17th (I saw the thing yesterday)
14:19:31 EmilienM cdent: maybe https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c17772e1f202c9ffb651adc3299a1990c35766f3 ?

Earlier   Later