| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-12 | |||
| 22:15:43 | mriedem | to opt in or pin the version | |
| 22:15:57 | mriedem | which is exactly what you have to do if you're requesting specific microversions via the python API | |
| 22:15:59 | scottda | ildikov: But why are you using 3.0? You'll still need the version with the new APIs | |
| 22:16:06 | mriedem | microversions in the python API bindings is opt-in, | |
| 22:16:21 | mriedem | the shell is a convenience to use the latest available that the client understands and the server can provide, | |
| 22:16:34 | mriedem | if you're coding to the shell and worry about changes with microversions, then you also have to pin with --os-compute-api-version | |
| 22:16:34 | scottda | BBIAB | |
| 22:17:18 | ildikov | scottda: I'm trying to make Nova pick up the new Cinder APIs and I kind of got stuck with how to do that and hence the questions on every relevant channel | |
| 22:21:17 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make api_samples tests use simple cell environment https://review.openstack.org/410473 | |
| 22:21:21 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP Move instance creation to conductor https://review.openstack.org/319379 | |
| 22:26:43 | cdent | #success edleafe found narrowed down an important bug in gabbi | |
| 22:26:44 | openstackstatus | cdent: Added success to Success page | |
| 22:26:58 | cdent | huh | |
| 22:27:03 | cdent | I've wanted to try that for a while | |
| 22:27:18 | mriedem | found narrowed down? | |
| 22:28:12 | cdent | both | |
| 22:28:35 | cdent | english, when typed, is my 6th language | |
| 22:28:41 | mriedem | heh | |
| 22:31:04 | cdent | sadly, I'm a total fail at solving the bug | |
| 22:31:12 | cdent | I guess that'll have to be tomorrow | |
| 22:32:56 | mriedem | just mark the bug as low-hanging-fruit | |
| 22:33:04 | mriedem | you'll have 10 new contributors lined up to fix it | |
| 22:33:32 | stewie925_ | hello all, hopefully a quick question - I have set up compute on my openstack and then I tried "sudo service nova-api restart" - it returned "nova-api stop/waiting nova-api start/running, process 4383" | |
| 22:33:41 | stewie925_ | is that a confirmation that the nova-api restarted successfully? | |
| 22:33:59 | mriedem | stewie925_: i know you're not new to this channel, but see the channel topic | |
| 22:34:15 | cdent | mriedem: that explains it. I haven't been tagging the bugs. | |
| 22:34:22 | mriedem | how you're deploying it on which distro and what packages etc etc isn't really for this channel | |
| 22:34:31 | stewie925_ | sorry | |
| 22:34:52 | mriedem | np - you'll know it's running if there are logs somewhere | |
| 22:51:15 | openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476 | |
| 22:53:18 | dims | mriedem : i think i am very close to nova boot a vm with this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419476/ | |
| 22:56:26 | mriedem | [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working ? | |
| 22:56:30 | mriedem | wrong title? | |
| 22:57:20 | dims | mriedem : actually i am watching gate-rally-dsvm-py35-cinder-nv over at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418643/ and debugging nova started from a rally test | |
| 23:07:20 | mriedem | jroll: fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415867/ | |
| 23:07:29 | mriedem | just updated that thing | |
| 23:08:23 | jroll | mriedem: u-c already landed, and I put up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419630/ this morning | |
| 23:08:42 | mriedem | jroll: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415867/ is the one that the nova change depends on | |
| 23:08:49 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364413/ depends on ^ | |
| 23:08:49 | jroll | yeah, I see that now | |
| 23:08:56 | mriedem | and is therefore infinitely more important :) | |
| 23:09:31 | jroll | ya | |
| 23:46:33 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Add check for invalid allocation amounts https://review.openstack.org/416752 | |
| 23:46:33 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Remove the Allocation.create() method. https://review.openstack.org/416751 | |
| 23:46:34 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Fix missing RP generation update https://review.openstack.org/419137 | |
| 23:54:51 | dims | nova.boot_server/attach_volume/detach_volume works! http://logs.openstack.org/43/418643/2/check/gate-rally-dsvm-py35-cinder-nv/c48f74a/rally-plot/results.html.gz#/CinderVolumes.create_and_attach_volume/details | |
| 23:54:56 | dims | (py35) | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-13 | |||
| 02:12:02 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Don't delete neutron port when attach failed https://review.openstack.org/403568 | |
| 02:24:42 | alex_xu | Kevin_Zheng: just commented on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419256/7, we still can make it simpler | |
| 02:25:12 | Kevin_Zheng | Thanks | |
| 02:45:35 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Liu proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Enable coverage report in console output https://review.openstack.org/419723 | |
| 02:54:20 | openstackgerrit | Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova: Add keypairs field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730 | |
| 03:04:06 | openstackgerrit | Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova: Add keypairs field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730 | |
| 03:28:36 | mriedem | edleafe: have you ever seen this failure in a functional test run for placement? http://logs.openstack.org/60/416760/1/check/gate-nova-tox-db-functional-ubuntu-xenial/f192837/console.html#_2017-01-12_15_22_00_609678 | |
| 03:28:43 | openstackgerrit | zhaolihui proposed openstack/nova: Fix keypair quota error https://review.openstack.org/403529 | |
| 03:30:42 | mriedem | seems to be random | |
| 03:33:17 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add some code to reject known bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256 | |
| 03:33:41 | openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476 | |
| 03:37:19 | mriedem | nvm i think it's a problem in that change actually | |
| 03:37:23 | mriedem | i'm probably missing some backport | |
| 03:46:49 | alex_xu | johnthetubaguy: gmann, Kevin_Zheng puts two ideas into single patch https://review.openstack.org/419256, probably enough to take look at how those looks like in the code. | |
| 03:53:38 | openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476 | |
| 03:55:12 | gmann | alex_xu: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng thanks, while giving try i got a way to reject known property from schema itself | |
| 03:55:38 | gmann | alex_xu: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng we can do with 'not' propoerty, i commented on this about how - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408571/38 | |
| 03:56:07 | gmann | actually in draft3 formatter it was 'disallow' and in 4 it is 'not' | |
| 03:56:17 | gmann | https://github.com/json-schema/json-schema/wiki/anyOf,-allOf,-oneOf,-not#not | |
| 03:56:22 | gmann | https://github.com/json-schema/json-schema/wiki/anyOf,-allOf,-oneOf,-not#replacing-schemas-in-disallow | |
| 03:56:57 | gmann | so basically with empty object with not like- 'not': {} we can reject all values of given element | |
| 03:57:38 | alex_xu | gmann: what kind of error message we can get? | |
| 03:58:09 | diga | gibi: Hi | |
| 03:58:34 | gmann | alex_xu: yea that is nice point | |
| 03:58:44 | gmann | alex_xu: it will like Invalid input for field/attribute system_metadata. Value: . {} is not allowed for 'mymeta' | |
| 03:58:58 | gmann | which we might need to modify seems | |
| 04:00:00 | Kevin_Zheng | Actually I like the format way better | |
| 04:00:55 | alex_xu | gmann: if we can get a correct message that will be great, not sure there is way to change that message | |
| 04:01:29 | Kevin_Zheng | it will be harder than the new format thing I think | |
| 04:01:56 | alex_xu | yea, i'm also worry about that | |
| 04:01:58 | gmann | alex_xu: yea error message is issue but let me check if we can easily modify that | |
| 04:02:03 | Kevin_Zheng | the mssage is below the one I changed for the current way | |
| 04:02:45 | Kevin_Zheng | maybe hard to identify the "not" thing because it might be a validation error? | |
| 04:02:46 | alex_xu | gmann: really appreciate that :) | |
| 04:03:00 | Kevin_Zheng | VallidationError | |
| 04:03:38 | gmann | Kevin_Zheng: yea it will be validation error from json itself | |
| 04:04:45 | Kevin_Zheng | gmann: yeah, but other also raise ValidationError and the msg was generated. So we have to identify the case of this | |
| 04:04:58 | Kevin_Zheng | maybe harder than the current way | |
| 04:05:49 | gmann | Kevin_Zheng: yea, that is pain point. | |
| 04:14:24 | gmann | alex_xu: Kevin_Zheng yea we have to add hack for that which kindda new overridden code on top of json schema. That is what new formatter way. | |
| 04:31:33 | openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476 | |
| 04:36:57 | gmann | alex_xu: Kevin_Zheng i think formatter is ok which is much easy, how about showing few schema example with new 'format' also in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419256/7 | |
| 05:19:23 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add some code to reject known bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256 | |
| 05:21:21 | Kevin_Zheng | gmann: thanks, and I replied your comment, and I just came up with the idea to also assert the error message in one test, will add it later | |
| 05:24:52 | gmann | Kevin_Zheng: i see, nice. thanks test case will be nice there | |
| 05:57:54 | openstackgerrit | zhaolihui proposed openstack/nova: Fix keypair quota error https://review.openstack.org/403529 | |
| 06:16:28 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Liu proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Enable coverage report in console output https://review.openstack.org/419723 | |
| 06:35:20 | openstackgerrit | Istvan Imre proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Pass relevant parameters to Token based authentication https://review.openstack.org/419441 | |
| 06:56:30 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add some code to reject known bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256 | |
| 06:57:02 | Kevin_Zheng | gmann, alex_xu tests added ^ | |
| 08:04:11 | snikitin | In our upgrade case we can try to fill diagnostics fields by information we got from old hypervisor drivers (most of fields in old and new diagnostics objects are equal) and left other fields empty. And of course we should log warning something like "Your compute is to old so data in diagnostics response may be incomplete" . What do you think? | |
| 08:04:11 | snikitin | As response of new micriversion is standartized we must return all diagnostics fields. But as we noted in spec and docs, some of this fields may be 'None' because some hypervisors can't provides some kinf in information. | |
| 08:04:11 | snikitin | alex_xu: Hi Alex! good point about upgrade problem in diagnostics api. You described case when we have new api and old compute, right? I think we can handle this case in view class https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355540/18/nova/api/openstack/compute/views/server_diagnostics.py | |