Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-12
22:10:32 smcginnis mriedem: Still seems like a risk.
22:10:43 mriedem smcginnis: if you're coding to the shell...well...
22:10:50 ildikov mriedem: fair enough
22:11:00 mriedem if you're coding to the shell you deserve to get broken
22:11:24 smcginnis Well, if you're just running commands from the CLI, that seems a risk that suddenly you could get different behavior.
22:13:38 ildikov mriedem: thanks much for the help/explanation of the pain I'm experiencing with testing :)
22:14:31 openstack Launchpad bug 1656105 in python-cinderclient "api_versions.update_headers doesn't set the microversion header if version is 3.0" [Undecided,New]
22:14:31 mriedem ildikov: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cinderclient/+bug/1656105
22:14:56 ildikov mriedem: thanks much!
22:15:01 scottda I'll put up a patch for that ^^^..When I get back from the bus stop.
22:15:38 ildikov scottda: sounds great, thanks
22:15:39 mriedem smcginnis: if you're coding to the shell you can override with --os-compute-api-version
22:15:43 mriedem to opt in or pin the version
22:15:57 mriedem which is exactly what you have to do if you're requesting specific microversions via the python API
22:15:59 scottda ildikov: But why are you using 3.0? You'll still need the version with the new APIs
22:16:06 mriedem microversions in the python API bindings is opt-in,
22:16:21 mriedem the shell is a convenience to use the latest available that the client understands and the server can provide,
22:16:34 mriedem if you're coding to the shell and worry about changes with microversions, then you also have to pin with --os-compute-api-version
22:16:34 scottda BBIAB
22:17:18 ildikov scottda: I'm trying to make Nova pick up the new Cinder APIs and I kind of got stuck with how to do that and hence the questions on every relevant channel
22:21:17 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make api_samples tests use simple cell environment https://review.openstack.org/410473
22:21:21 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP Move instance creation to conductor https://review.openstack.org/319379
22:26:43 cdent #success edleafe found narrowed down an important bug in gabbi
22:26:44 openstackstatus cdent: Added success to Success page
22:26:58 cdent huh
22:27:03 cdent I've wanted to try that for a while
22:27:18 mriedem found narrowed down?
22:28:12 cdent both
22:28:35 cdent english, when typed, is my 6th language
22:28:41 mriedem heh
22:31:04 cdent sadly, I'm a total fail at solving the bug
22:31:12 cdent I guess that'll have to be tomorrow
22:32:56 mriedem just mark the bug as low-hanging-fruit
22:33:04 mriedem you'll have 10 new contributors lined up to fix it
22:33:32 stewie925_ hello all, hopefully a quick question - I have set up compute on my openstack and then I tried "sudo service nova-api restart" - it returned "nova-api stop/waiting nova-api start/running, process 4383"
22:33:41 stewie925_ is that a confirmation that the nova-api restarted successfully?
22:33:59 mriedem stewie925_: i know you're not new to this channel, but see the channel topic
22:34:15 cdent mriedem: that explains it. I haven't been tagging the bugs.
22:34:22 mriedem how you're deploying it on which distro and what packages etc etc isn't really for this channel
22:34:31 stewie925_ sorry
22:34:52 mriedem np - you'll know it's running if there are logs somewhere
22:51:15 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476
22:53:18 dims mriedem : i think i am very close to nova boot a vm with this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419476/
22:56:26 mriedem [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working ?
22:56:30 mriedem wrong title?
22:57:20 dims mriedem : actually i am watching gate-rally-dsvm-py35-cinder-nv over at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418643/ and debugging nova started from a rally test
23:07:20 mriedem jroll: fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415867/
23:07:29 mriedem just updated that thing
23:08:23 jroll mriedem: u-c already landed, and I put up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419630/ this morning
23:08:42 mriedem jroll: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415867/ is the one that the nova change depends on
23:08:49 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364413/ depends on ^
23:08:49 jroll yeah, I see that now
23:08:56 mriedem and is therefore infinitely more important :)
23:09:31 jroll ya
23:46:33 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Add check for invalid allocation amounts https://review.openstack.org/416752
23:46:33 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Remove the Allocation.create() method. https://review.openstack.org/416751
23:46:34 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova: Fix missing RP generation update https://review.openstack.org/419137
23:54:51 dims nova.boot_server/attach_volume/detach_volume works! http://logs.openstack.org/43/418643/2/check/gate-rally-dsvm-py35-cinder-nv/c48f74a/rally-plot/results.html.gz#/CinderVolumes.create_and_attach_volume/details
23:54:56 dims (py35)
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-13
02:12:02 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Don't delete neutron port when attach failed https://review.openstack.org/403568
02:24:42 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng: just commented on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419256/7, we still can make it simpler
02:25:12 Kevin_Zheng Thanks
02:45:35 openstackgerrit Jeremy Liu proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Enable coverage report in console output https://review.openstack.org/419723
02:54:20 openstackgerrit Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova: Add keypairs field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730
03:04:06 openstackgerrit Anusha Unnam proposed openstack/nova: Add keypairs field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730
03:28:36 mriedem edleafe: have you ever seen this failure in a functional test run for placement? http://logs.openstack.org/60/416760/1/check/gate-nova-tox-db-functional-ubuntu-xenial/f192837/console.html#_2017-01-12_15_22_00_609678
03:28:43 openstackgerrit zhaolihui proposed openstack/nova: Fix keypair quota error https://review.openstack.org/403529
03:30:42 mriedem seems to be random
03:33:17 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add some code to reject known bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256
03:33:41 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476
03:37:19 mriedem nvm i think it's a problem in that change actually
03:37:23 mriedem i'm probably missing some backport
03:46:49 alex_xu johnthetubaguy: gmann, Kevin_Zheng puts two ideas into single patch https://review.openstack.org/419256, probably enough to take look at how those looks like in the code.
03:53:38 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476
03:55:12 gmann alex_xu: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng thanks, while giving try i got a way to reject known property from schema itself
03:55:38 gmann alex_xu: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng we can do with 'not' propoerty, i commented on this about how - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408571/38
03:56:07 gmann actually in draft3 formatter it was 'disallow' and in 4 it is 'not'
03:56:17 gmann https://github.com/json-schema/json-schema/wiki/anyOf,-allOf,-oneOf,-not#not
03:56:22 gmann https://github.com/json-schema/json-schema/wiki/anyOf,-allOf,-oneOf,-not#replacing-schemas-in-disallow
03:56:57 gmann so basically with empty object with not like- 'not': {} we can reject all values of given element
03:57:38 alex_xu gmann: what kind of error message we can get?
03:58:09 diga gibi: Hi
03:58:34 gmann alex_xu: yea that is nice point
03:58:44 gmann alex_xu: it will like Invalid input for field/attribute system_metadata. Value: . {} is not allowed for 'mymeta'
03:58:58 gmann which we might need to modify seems
04:00:00 Kevin_Zheng Actually I like the format way better
04:00:55 alex_xu gmann: if we can get a correct message that will be great, not sure there is way to change that message
04:01:29 Kevin_Zheng it will be harder than the new format thing I think
04:01:56 alex_xu yea, i'm also worry about that
04:01:58 gmann alex_xu: yea error message is issue but let me check if we can easily modify that
04:02:03 Kevin_Zheng the mssage is below the one I changed for the current way
04:02:45 Kevin_Zheng maybe hard to identify the "not" thing because it might be a validation error?
04:02:46 alex_xu gmann: really appreciate that :)
04:03:00 Kevin_Zheng VallidationError
04:03:38 gmann Kevin_Zheng: yea it will be validation error from json itself
04:04:45 Kevin_Zheng gmann: yeah, but other also raise ValidationError and the msg was generated. So we have to identify the case of this
04:04:58 Kevin_Zheng maybe harder than the current way
04:05:49 gmann Kevin_Zheng: yea, that is pain point.
04:14:24 gmann alex_xu: Kevin_Zheng yea we have to add hack for that which kindda new overridden code on top of json schema. That is what new formatter way.
04:31:33 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: [WIP][py35] Trying to get cinder+rally working https://review.openstack.org/419476

Earlier   Later