Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-11
17:02:55 gibi mriedem: so that works the same way as the code that emits the instance.<action> notifications
17:03:36 openstack Launchpad bug 1655710 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Query parameter validation using json schema - error messages" [Undecided,New]
17:03:36 diana_clarke mriedem, sdague, alex_xu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1655710
17:05:08 mriedem thanks
17:05:39 mriedem diana_clarke: so do you get a 400 or a 500 now?
17:05:56 mriedem i assume you still get a 400 response
17:06:04 diana_clarke mriedem: not sure off the top of my head, but I can check
17:06:26 gibi mriedem: we can fix flavor.create by adding the extra_specs in the expected_attr here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/flavor.py#L494
17:07:11 mriedem gibi: wouldn't that already be done because of this? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/flavor.py#L490
17:07:17 openstackgerrit avnish proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Removed unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/418839
17:07:20 mriedem extra_specs is in OPTIONAL_FIELDS
17:07:54 gibi mriedem: I think not because extra_specs is not in updates at https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/flavor.py#L491
17:08:54 mriedem oh right i missed the in updates check
17:10:27 gibi mriedem: Is it OK for you if I just fix this as part of the bugfix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415857/
17:11:29 mriedem gibi: that's dealing with aggregates, so i'd think it'd be part of a separate change in that series? i guess it's hard for me to say without knowing in detail what the actual change is going to be - i don't have the context in my head right now
17:12:12 mriedem raj_singh: fyi i updated the devstack series that's testing the service user token stuff
17:12:26 mriedem i want to see how that runs before i +2 the bottom change in the nova series
17:12:48 gibi mriedem: right, that patch getting mixed up with different object fixes due to the same root cause
17:12:59 gibi mriedem: I can split it into a series of patches
17:13:18 raj_singh_ mriedem: I am using https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413232/ to test the series, which is dependent on the devstack patch as well. BTW it works
17:13:35 raj_singh_ mriedem: http://logs.openstack.org/32/413232/4/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/fcaf67a/console.html
17:13:52 raj_singh_ tempest.api.compute.admin.test_live_migration.LiveBlockMigrationTestJSON.test_live_block_migration [412.934140s] ... ok
17:14:35 raj_singh_ I put a sleep of 400 and this test took more than 400 with service token enabled. I will upadate the commit msg on DNM patches to avoid confusion
17:17:12 diana_clarke mriedem: yup, 400 b/c exceptions.ValidationError inherits from exceptions.Invalid which has 400 for code
17:17:47 mriedem diana_clarke: ok
17:17:51 mriedem raj_singh: yup cool
17:19:11 dansmith melwitt: okay, running with the config as the gate does, I now get fewer tests, and many more fails
17:20:44 mriedem raj_singh: actually that's kind of odd that it's passing in your test patch,
17:20:57 mriedem raj_singh: because we don't currently run volume-backed live migration tests in the live migration job
17:21:04 mriedem those are skipped for now due to bugs
17:21:40 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Add post hook script to run tempest with old n-api https://review.openstack.org/401395
17:21:41 raj_singh_ :)
17:24:15 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova: Refactor InstancePayload creation https://review.openstack.org/418488
17:24:16 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova: Remove **kwargs passing in payload __init__ https://review.openstack.org/418489
17:25:13 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Add post hook script to run tempest with old n-api https://review.openstack.org/401395
17:28:04 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
17:31:50 melwitt dansmith: hm, odd. I guess I didn't make note of how many total tests vs gate when I was running it
17:33:45 dansmith melwitt: a lot of my fails are keystone and cinder, so maybe it's not as bad
17:33:53 dansmith but the total is still different
17:35:12 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Do not merge: Test newly introduced zero-downtime-upgrade gate job https://review.openstack.org/419066
17:35:12 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Add post hook script to run tempest with old n-api https://review.openstack.org/401395
17:36:58 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: DNM: Test service token https://review.openstack.org/413232
17:37:52 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Do not merge: Test newly introduced zero-downtime-upgrade gate job https://review.openstack.org/419066
17:38:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: xenapi: support the hotplug of a neutron port https://review.openstack.org/365505
17:42:55 mriedem GET jaypipes returns a 404
17:42:56 mriedem :(
17:43:22 mriedem GET/nova-core/jaypipes I guess i should say
17:43:30 diana_clarke I've been working on adding microversion 2.40 support to the python-openstack client, but it currently doesn't do anything special for any of the compute microversions...
17:43:42 mriedem diana_clarke: yeah that's kind of a losing battle right now i think
17:43:50 mriedem diana_clarke: we don't have any microversion support in osc yet
17:43:57 cdent mriedem: ZOMG YOU ARE DOING IT COMPLETELY WRONG, HOW COULD YOU, DIE IN A FIRE
17:44:16 diana_clarke mriedem: okay, so perhaps I'll just abort that mission. Or it could be my new baby ;)
17:44:16 edleafe cdent: +1
17:44:43 mriedem diana_clarke: raising your human baby might be easier than getting that done :)
17:44:49 diana_clarke LOL
17:44:58 mriedem far less crying
17:45:30 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Add post hook script to run tempest with old n-api https://review.openstack.org/401395
17:46:19 mriedem to be fair at some point we really need someone to actually dig into making microversions work in osc,
17:46:24 mriedem i just haven't given it the attention it needs
17:48:05 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: DNM: Test service token https://review.openstack.org/413232
17:50:54 mriedem diana_clarke: i added something to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-pike for compute microversions in osc
17:52:10 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding tags field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/407228
17:54:31 diana_clarke mriedem: thx!
17:58:34 diana_clarke mriedem: I added a bit of additional info. I won't be traveling to trumpland for the PTG, but I'll follow along via the etherpads.
18:04:15 openstackgerrit Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova: Retry few times when creating the initial connection to libvirtd. https://review.openstack.org/416928
18:09:15 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-neutron interaction https://review.openstack.org/410394
18:18:39 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: hyper-v: Adds support for VMs with nested virtualization https://review.openstack.org/398509
18:24:04 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: DNM: Test service token https://review.openstack.org/413232
18:45:01 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova: Extract preallocate_for_instance https://review.openstack.org/418876
18:45:02 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova: Pass objects into _update_ports_for_instance https://review.openstack.org/418513
18:45:02 openstackgerrit John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova: Pass objects into _create_ports_for_instance https://review.openstack.org/418512
18:46:17 artom claudiub|2, around? Can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415520/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418100/? It's the virt driver patches for the continuation of device tagging, tagged attachment of nics and volumes
18:46:53 artom I'm not sure I have a specific ask as of yet, as their shape could change in response to reviews, but would something like that be doable for hyper-v?
18:50:37 claudiub|2 looking
18:50:54 claudiub|2 meanwhile, happy new year. :D
18:51:21 artom claudiub|2, thanks, same to you :) And happy orthodox christmas, if you're into that stuff ^_^
18:52:06 claudiub|2 hm, i am orthodox, but my christmas was in 25th dec. :D
18:52:47 claudiub|2 artom: question: shouldn't the configdrive be regenerated, to also include the new tag?
18:53:12 artom claudiub|2, yeah, but that's trickier, since we need to wait for the instance to be off
18:53:27 artom We can't just yank it from underneath the guest while it's running
18:53:36 artom It may be mounted, etc
18:55:11 claudiub|2 hm, how about regenerating it on interface_attach, but don't attach it yet, and then attach the new one on power_on?
18:56:12 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova: Improve flavor sample in notification sample tests https://review.openstack.org/419086
18:56:19 claudiub|2 artom: also, i suppose you will want to merge this before the feature-freeze, right?
18:56:44 artom claudiub|2, in my wildest dreams, yeah :)
18:56:59 artom But I'm aware this is pretty last minute
18:58:28 gibi mriedem: I improved the flavor extra_specs part of the instance. notification samples test with the watchdog device as you suggested https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419086
18:58:28 claudiub|2 anyways. it is doable for hyper-v
18:58:32 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Don't bypass cellsv1 replication if cellsv2 maps are in place https://review.openstack.org/418141
18:58:45 claudiub|2 i'll have to send up a patch for it then. :)
18:59:26 claudiub|2 doesn't seem like much to be done, imo. only that configdrive regeneration is a bit trickier
19:00:06 claudiub|2 artom: also, regarding device tagging, are pci devices tagged as well?
19:00:29 artom claudiub|2, don't think so...
19:00:47 artom There's no API for it
19:01:51 mriedem gibi: ok
19:02:18 mriedem GET /nova-core/jaypipes -> 200!
19:02:32 mriedem jaypipes: when you have 10 free minutes, could you please manhandle this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140045/
19:03:26 mriedem claudiub|2: while you're around there were some comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/282407/ - i'm not sure if they are all valid though, so would be cool to respond to those sooner than later
19:05:29 dansmith mriedem: um, I think you mean personhandle
19:06:05 mriedem dansmith: do women womanhandle?

Earlier   Later