Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-06
16:46:06 mriedem i don't know which change that is referring to in oslo.messaging
16:48:51 melwitt mriedem: ah, right. that TODO is invalid but there were specific changes in oslo.messaging to make it use [DEFAULT]/transport_url, so need to see if those are part of newton
16:49:18 mriedem not only part of newton, but probably part of the minimum required version of oslo.messaging in newton
16:49:32 mriedem to ensure that it works with the minimum package dependencies
16:49:41 melwitt right
16:52:58 openstackgerrit Julian proposed openstack/nova: Transform keypair.create notification https://review.openstack.org/408689
17:03:07 mriedem BobBall: oh so close https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365505/
17:06:24 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova: Ignore IOError when creating 'console.log' https://review.openstack.org/392643
17:07:23 sfinucan sahid, vladikr: Any chance ye could have a look at ^ when you have a chance?
17:07:47 vladikr sfinucan, sure
17:08:15 BobBall mriedem: I think we're OK - aren't all API calls here synchronized on the VM object?
17:08:23 BobBall Let me find that...
17:08:26 mriedem BobBall: nope
17:08:35 BobBall I thought they were in the XenAPI driver
17:08:51 mriedem oh, well that might be news to me
17:09:06 BobBall Nope, it's not
17:09:16 BobBall I was sure they were at one point :D
17:09:55 BobBall Easy enough to add a utils.synchronized to the plug method though?
17:10:19 mriedem yeah
17:10:28 mriedem although
17:10:34 mriedem attach interface is an rpc call
17:10:48 mriedem but i guess if you lock on the instance then that should be ok
17:11:03 BobBall yeah - I meant on the instance.
17:11:07 mriedem hopefully 2 plugs for the same instance at the same time could complete in under 60 seconds
17:11:13 leakypipes dansmith: mind taking a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413068/3/oslo_versionedobjects/base.py? I have a suspicion that doing that is not intended...
17:11:27 BobBall The synchronization I was thinking of is already there for VBD plug / unplug
17:11:35 BobBall oh yes, for sure.
17:12:24 BobBall Could probably just synchronize the creation (not hotplug) - once we have the record in the XenServer DB it will not announce that as an allowed device
17:12:43 dansmith leakypipes: yep, you're right
17:13:03 leakypipes phew.
17:15:54 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Fix TypeError in _update_from_compute_node race https://review.openstack.org/416822
17:20:54 dansmith mriedem: what do I do for this? use or something? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410471/6/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_hypervisors.py
17:22:42 dansmith or %(int)s I guess
17:24:21 dansmith hmm, nope
17:24:40 leakypipes dansmith: couldn't you just do: \d+
17:24:59 leakypipes BTW, is superdan in hiding? ;)
17:24:59 dansmith leakypipes: yes, but just trying to figure out how to use the integrated one he suggested
17:25:10 dansmith oh jeez is it friday?
17:25:14 leakypipes sure is!
17:25:16 leakypipes :)
17:25:19 leakypipes there he is!
17:25:29 leakypipes to save the day.
17:25:38 sean-k-mooney leakypipes: hi jay would you have time to review sfinucan mtu patch to os-vif https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408779
17:25:40 bauzas superdan: leakypipes: mriedem: folks, I have an important question for you
17:25:48 bauzas oh man, my manners
17:25:55 leakypipes sean-k-mooney: yup, will do. thx for the heads up.
17:26:37 leakypipes superdan: yeah, looks like %(int)s is correct there.
17:26:45 bauwser superdan: leakypipes: mriedem: so, since I wanted to write the scheduler-side of the placement call for getting the list of RPs, I thought about the fact we wrote the methods within the client.report module
17:26:53 superdan leakypipes: doesn't work
17:27:22 bauwser superdan: leakypipes: mriedem: that's why I began to cut that from the module and rather create a new module with a PlacementClient
17:27:38 leakypipes sdague: perhaps you might know the answer to superdan's dilemma?
17:27:50 bauwser superdan: leakypipes: mriedem: but given it will need some tests modifications, that change will be huge to review
17:28:05 superdan sdague: I'm trying (desperately) to run devstack locally with cellsv1 and I keep getting use_neutron=True, despite using the ENABLED_SERVICES list from the gate run
17:28:16 superdan sdague: any idea if there's something else that will trigger neutron? I need n-net for cellsv1
17:28:26 bauwser superdan: leakypipes: mriedem: do you guys think we should maybe just use the existing and cut the placementclient afterwards?N
17:28:40 leakypipes bauwser: yes.
17:29:12 bauwser okay, I'll put my existing modifications in a WIP change and -2 it
17:29:52 bauwser tbh, I'm a bit afraid of the time flying
17:29:57 superdan sdague: hmm, maybe the interface/network configs
17:31:47 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make the SingleCellSimple fixture a little more comprehensive https://review.openstack.org/410472
17:31:47 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Fix non-parameterized service id in hypervisors sample tests https://review.openstack.org/410471
17:32:42 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova: Transform instance.reboot notifications https://review.openstack.org/382959
17:37:40 melwitt mriedem: so newton requires oslo.messaging>=5.2.0 and all of the rpc backends already supported config via [DEFAULT]/transport_url at that time. so it should be okay
17:37:55 superdan melwitt: I have no idea why, but suddenly the host calls are failing in cellsv1 with my patch: http://logs.openstack.org/75/396775/21/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-cells-ubuntu-xenial/2d615a2/logs/screen-n-api.txt.gz?#_2017-01-06_16_01_16_390
17:38:19 superdan melwitt: timing out calling through cells to the compute host.. super weird since that patch only touches instance listings
17:38:41 openstackgerrit Julian proposed openstack/nova: Transform instance.add_fixed_ip notification https://review.openstack.org/332876
17:39:19 leakypipes sfinucan, sean-k-mooney: questions on commit message.
17:39:28 melwitt superdan: lettuce see
17:39:37 superdan melwitt: just talking out loud
17:40:11 melwitt oh, yeah. I was thinking maybe since listing does a /detail call, it's trying to pull some host info? that doesn't really make sense though
17:41:14 sean-k-mooney leakypipes: thanks jay ill take a look at it now. im just opening a bug for the windows issues that sfinucan change uncovered
17:42:05 superdan melwitt: it's just the test hitting the /hypervisors api afaict
17:42:34 melwitt yeah, I see that now. weird
17:46:48 leakypipes superdan: so did you figure out the substitution thing?
17:47:18 superdan leakypipes: no, I went with the + instead of * thing, and will change it if mriedem requires and/or tells me how
17:47:36 superdan leakypipes: but I'm hoping he'll just let it go as is
17:47:48 leakypipes superdan: but I see "%(int:service_id)s"
17:48:11 leakypipes superdan: should that just be "%(service_id)s"
17:48:13 leakypipes ?
17:49:06 superdan none of those work for me
17:54:05 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova: Added instance.reboot.error to the legacy notifications https://review.openstack.org/411816
17:54:06 openstackgerrit Gábor Antal proposed openstack/nova: Transform instance.reboot.error notification https://review.openstack.org/411791
17:55:11 melwitt superdan: I guess the only thing I notice is if you look at the test_results all of the tests failed with a timeout of some kind, but for some reason only the hypervisors api tests are showing any traces in the logs of a timeout
17:55:54 melwitt so I wonder if it's a side effect
17:56:09 superdan but.. look at the change.. it's just adding stuff to get_all instances
17:56:26 superdan seems like.. totally unrelated
17:57:06 melwitt I know. I was thinking maybe other tests that do a listing bombarded the queue so hard that it made all the other tests time out too? I dunno
17:57:36 superdan I dunno, or if we locked up the compute node somehow
17:57:46 melwitt hm, yeah
17:57:48 superdan the hypervisors one is the only one I saw with any tracebacks anywhere,
17:57:54 superdan so I was trying to follow that thread
17:59:08 melwitt there's a guru meditation report in the n-cpu.log
17:59:14 melwitt is that usual?
17:59:53 superdan any time we fail the run we do that I think
18:00:02 superdan also, I see debug in n-api that shows us listing cells prperly and stuff
18:00:08 superdan Found 2 cells: cell0,cell1 _get_instances_by_filters_all_cells
18:00:13 superdan which is what this thing changes
18:00:39 superdan although, the two patches before this don't run the cells job
18:00:43 superdan because they're test only
18:00:58 superdan so I wonder if this is just failing recently by chance? seems too unlikely, but...

Earlier   Later