Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-04-18
06:33:01 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/cyborg master: use oslotest autospec mock fixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/985210
07:19:35 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/cyborg master: use oslotest autospec mock fixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/985210
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-04-20
09:41:00 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add spec for generic NVMe driver with cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349
10:13:50 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add spec for generic NVMe driver with cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-04-21
12:59:53 sean-k-mooney nova cyborg cross project starting in https://meetpad.opendev.org/nova-2026.2-ptg
17:08:22 jgilaber sean-k-mooney, are you joining the last cyborg session?
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-04-28
06:51:23 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add VM setup documentation for Cyborg development https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983964
06:52:37 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add VM setup documentation for Cyborg development https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983964
06:52:53 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Cyborg NVMe driver development environment documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711
08:15:50 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Cyborg NVMe driver development environment documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711
08:17:05 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add user guide for creating instances with accelerators https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983027
08:17:13 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add doc around cyborg tempest test and grenade testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983030
08:21:57 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add doc around cyborg tempest test and grenade testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983030
10:03:12 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add VM setup documentation for Cyborg development https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/983964
12:01:12 chandankumar Cyborg IRC meeting in another 2 hours. Feel free to add your agenda here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L45 thank you!
13:46:07 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: pci: Fix missing OWNER_CYBORG trait in PCI devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/986536
14:03:39 chandankumar Hello all, who all are around for meeting
14:03:47 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'cyborg'
14:03:47 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:47 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Apr 28 14:03:47 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:47 chandankumar #startmeeting cyborg
14:03:52 chandankumar o/
14:03:59 sean-k-mooney o/
14:04:00 jgilaber o/
14:04:06 morenod o/
14:04:15 chandankumar #courtesy ping bogdando[m] rlandy amoralej
14:04:24 amoralej o/
14:04:35 chandankumar In the mean time, feel free to add your agenda https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L45
14:05:37 chandankumar Let me get started with the first topic
14:05:52 chandankumar #topic 2026.2 hibiscus ptg summary
14:05:57 chandankumar I have added this topic
14:06:26 chandankumar Thank you sean-k-mooney for sending the ptg summary to mailing list
14:06:30 chandankumar #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/MBE5DX4IQTD4SQOTSWNTDBBHTN5BSCPE/
14:06:42 sean-k-mooney if there are any corrections please respond or let me know
14:07:24 rlandy o/
14:07:38 jgilaber I looked at the email this morning, everything looked right to me
14:08:16 chandankumar sure, will do that.
14:08:43 chandankumar If there is no question on above topic, let me move to the next section as there is no other topic
14:08:50 chandankumar #topic reviews
14:09:01 chandankumar #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22cyborg-dev-doc%22
14:09:16 chandankumar I was working on improving the contributor doc.
14:09:39 chandankumar Thank you everyone for all the feedback on the patch series. I have addressed them. Feel free to take a look.
14:10:56 chandankumar Moving to next one
14:11:21 chandankumar #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/984508: Add placement client config for devstack multinode
14:11:56 chandankumar this one fixes the devstack plugin for multinode job and add a new multinode
14:12:05 chandankumar devstack job.
14:12:33 chandankumar Please add it to your review list.
14:13:40 chandankumar Do we have any more reviews anyone wants to highlight?
14:14:52 chandankumar moving to the next section
14:14:59 chandankumar #topic bugs
14:15:14 chandankumar #link PCI devices does not have OWNER_CYBORG traits https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/2150557
14:15:49 chandankumar During 2026.2 ptg, under driver development discussion, we talked about traits and pci devices does not OWNER_CYBORG
14:16:03 sean-k-mooney ack review might be a bit slow this week but ill try to pick back up next week
14:16:07 chandankumar for that one, I have opened the bug
14:16:34 chandankumar https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/986536 it fixes the same.
14:16:45 sean-k-mooney ok that may be a suitable bug
14:16:56 chandankumar Since it changes the output in openstack accelerator device attribute list
14:16:58 sean-k-mooney the upgrade impact of that shoudl be effectivly 0
14:17:17 chandankumar will it need a release notes? and test coverage?
14:17:36 sean-k-mooney i default to yes in both cases
14:17:48 sean-k-mooney it need at least unit test coverage
14:17:48 chandankumar ok good
14:18:00 chandankumar PCI device lacks unit tests.
14:18:06 jgilaber should we add that trait to all drivers? A quick search shows that other drivers seem to be missing it
14:18:06 sean-k-mooney ...
14:18:09 chandankumar I need to take a look how much we have coverage
14:18:11 jgilaber https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopenstack%2Fcyborg%20traits&type=code
14:18:21 chandankumar yes,
14:18:26 sean-k-mooney jgilaber: yes so i wonder if we want to track this as more then a bug
14:18:47 chandankumar it is currently available in FGPA, PCI, GPU only
14:18:55 jgilaber yes a specless blueprint might be a good fit I think
14:18:59 sean-k-mooney this is part of the "how do we model devices in placment" topic
14:19:19 jgilaber particularly if the testing needs significant work
14:19:49 chandankumar I will take a look at how much test coverage we have there for device spec and whitelist there is no coverage
14:19:59 sean-k-mooney i added some test when i fixed eliaer bugs in the pci driver by the way
14:20:05 sean-k-mooney as in unit tests
14:20:13 sean-k-mooney we will want to have tempest test for this later too
14:20:27 chandankumar https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/tree/master/cyborg/tests/unit/accelerator/drivers/pci/pci
14:20:47 chandankumar https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/cyborg/tests/unit/accelerator/drivers/pci/pci/test_sysinfo.py
14:20:49 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/cyborg/tests/unit/accelerator/drivers/pci/pci/test_sysinfo.py
14:20:51 chandankumar it will the test voverage
14:21:09 sean-k-mooney ya so we have driver specific test although perhpas not where you expect them
14:21:28 sean-k-mooney so at the very lease we need unit test cover for this in the future functional and tempest test too
14:22:03 chandankumar regarding traits, there is some code duplication about constant names, May be I can clean it in the same patch
14:22:25 sean-k-mooney in general that better to do in a sperate patch
14:22:29 chandankumar ok
14:22:32 sean-k-mooney but it kind fo depends
14:22:37 sean-k-mooney on if we woudl abckprot this or not
14:22:39 chandankumar will do a follow up patch then
14:22:44 sean-k-mooney in my mind this is maser only
14:23:17 sean-k-mooney as a general rule you shoudl do code cleanup in a sepreate patch form bug or feature work
14:23:20 chandankumar as you said there is no upgrade impact, i think it is ok to backport
14:23:34 sean-k-mooney well there is
14:23:43 sean-k-mooney but its mitigated by how old that specific trait is
14:24:28 chandankumar https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/commit/5f896d2931d1a02e4beaf2cb4109a8a3e384b155 unifies pci management
14:24:41 sean-k-mooney if this trait was new this cycle we coudl nto backprot it to an older relase as an example
14:25:17 sean-k-mooney that not what you need to check in this case
14:25:19 sean-k-mooney its https://github.com/openstack/os-traits/blob/master/os_traits/owner/__init__.py
14:25:25 sean-k-mooney that was added 4 years ago
14:25:53 sean-k-mooney if it was new in 2026.2 you woudl have to check fi the standard trait exsitns in placment before reporting it

Earlier   Later