Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-04-14
14:07:39 sean-k-mooney that was form 6 years ago
14:07:56 sean-k-mooney so i suspect that since then thing have been done that make it harder to get it working
14:08:11 chandankumar https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/984508 with thing, I am able to get it working locally
14:08:18 sean-k-mooney so they might help but i expect we will need to mostly do it form scratch
14:08:55 sean-k-mooney ya thats a new requirement
14:09:08 sean-k-mooney i made the cybrog agent use it last cycle
14:09:18 sean-k-mooney before that only the conductor talksed to placemnt
14:09:34 sean-k-mooney everually the conducore shoudl never talk to placement :)
14:10:08 chandankumar ok
14:10:36 sean-k-mooney but cool ill take a looka t that but proably after/durign the ptg
14:10:47 chandankumar sure
14:11:28 chandankumar coming back to instance action, I know we need to add tempest test coverage for what is supported.
14:12:11 chandankumar Do we want to document these cyborg supported actions somewhere? or linking back to https://docs.openstack.org/api-guide/compute/accelerator-support.html would be enough
14:12:31 sean-k-mooney so the api-guide is noler really suprpoted
14:12:39 sean-k-mooney but yes we do need to docuemtn this in tree
14:12:58 chandankumar we also have this https://docs.openstack.org/cyborg/wallaby/reference/support-matrix.html
14:13:23 sean-k-mooney yes that the right location
14:13:36 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/cyborg/latest/reference/support-matrix.html
14:13:41 sean-k-mooney with the new templat
14:13:47 chandankumar ok I was not aware about api-guide doc supported. Do we want to drop that page
14:14:03 sean-k-mooney we also shoudl use the "version-added" sphinx command
14:14:19 sean-k-mooney we will also want to docuemnt this on the nova side
14:14:22 chandankumar latest one is much better thanks
14:14:28 sean-k-mooney but that will be done when we enabel new commands there
14:14:51 sean-k-mooney as an aside https://docs.openstack.org/cyborg/latest/reference/support-matrix.html#driver-support
14:15:05 sean-k-mooney is where i evnetually want to document the support status agnd gaps
14:15:15 sean-k-mooney similar to the watcher stragy matix
14:15:25 sean-k-mooney so having this all in that page is useful
14:15:53 chandankumar sure, will look into that.
14:16:04 chandankumar Thank you, that's it from my side.
14:16:35 jgilaber thanks chandankumar
14:16:48 jgilaber if there is nothing else we can move to the next topic
14:17:34 jgilaber #topic PTG topics/planning
14:17:44 jgilaber we have some topics for PTG already listed
14:17:50 jgilaber #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cyborg-2026.2-ptg
14:18:29 jgilaber do we need to discuss that or are we set for PTG?
14:19:53 sean-k-mooney honestly
14:20:06 sean-k-mooney i wanted to figure that out last week and im not sure ill have time this week
14:20:24 sean-k-mooney so what i woudl say is if you have topic you want to bring up
14:20:34 sean-k-mooney extend the etherpad
14:20:47 sean-k-mooney and we will organsie it firday or on monday
14:21:04 jgilaber ack, sounds good
14:21:15 chandankumar sure
14:21:19 sean-k-mooney ill try to add content if i can but if we can do it together that woudl be great
14:22:01 chandankumar I will add one more topic related to placement traits naming convention for cyborg
14:22:32 chandankumar may be tomorrow
14:22:51 sean-k-mooney so any trait that cyborg uses shoudl eb in os-triats or CUSTOM_
14:23:09 sean-k-mooney but for nvme devices we shoudl not use traits to encode vendor id and product id
14:23:16 sean-k-mooney that is an exisitng bug in the pci dirver
14:23:31 sean-k-mooney vendor id and product id shoudl be in the resouce class name
14:24:34 sean-k-mooney what this means is if we have a standard trait for a feature we shoudl alwasy update os-triats first. we only use CUSTOM_ in service project if an only if there isnt a finte set
14:24:53 sean-k-mooney but ya lets chat about that more at the ptg
14:24:57 chandankumar sure
14:25:06 sean-k-mooney and we can docuemtn that the contibutre docs/spec going forward
14:26:10 jgilaber ack, anything else on this topic?
14:26:17 chandankumar nope
14:26:50 jgilaber next one also related to PTG
14:27:03 jgilaber # topci cancel next week meeting for PTG
14:27:16 jgilaber #topic cancel next week meeting for PTG
14:27:19 jgilaber sorry about that
14:27:29 jgilaber any objections for cancelling?
14:27:38 sean-k-mooney nope sounds good
14:27:49 chandankumar nope
14:28:12 jgilaber ack, next meeting will be cancelled and we will meet again on April 28th
14:28:51 jgilaber that was the last topic, let's move to bug triage
14:28:56 jgilaber #topic Bugs
14:29:08 jgilaber #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/2148278
14:29:20 jgilaber we have a bug from chandankumar that we touched on briefly before
14:29:26 chandankumar It is the same bug we were talking during instance action topic
14:29:30 chandankumar yup
14:29:45 jgilaber looks like you have a patch open for it
14:29:50 jgilaber #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/984508
14:29:59 jgilaber can I assign you to it chandankumar?
14:30:03 chandankumar sure
14:30:09 chandankumar thank you!
14:30:19 sean-k-mooney ya so that jsut effectivly lack of multi node supprot
14:30:26 sean-k-mooney in the plugin wich is valid
14:30:32 sean-k-mooney since it was never offically supported
14:30:43 sean-k-mooney so medium
14:30:54 sean-k-mooney its aleady in progres anyway
14:31:05 jgilaber medium sounds good to me
14:32:09 jgilaber looking at the tags, we don't have any related to devstack, should we create one?
14:32:33 sean-k-mooney i just addedit
14:33:07 sean-k-mooney basicly because i wanted to be clear its no actully a cybrog bug its a cybrog devstack plugin bug
14:33:09 sean-k-mooney or feature
14:33:29 jgilaber ack thanks, so I think we're set for this bug, anything else to comment here?
14:33:51 sean-k-mooney not for the bug but i have one item for opendiscuss
14:34:12 jgilaber ack let's move to that then
14:34:17 jgilaber #topic Open Discussion
14:34:54 sean-k-mooney so i was talkign to uggla about the nova cross project sessions
14:34:57 sean-k-mooney 15:32:33 Uggla | 1300-1400UTC : Cyborg cross team session
14:34:59 sean-k-mooney 15:32:33 Uggla | 1400-1500UTC : Ironic cross team session
14:35:15 sean-k-mooney i will likely need to attend the ironic one as well
14:35:29 sean-k-mooney how woudl folks feel about moving the final cyborg hour later in the week
14:35:57 sean-k-mooney so form say 1400 UTC
14:36:04 sean-k-mooney to 17:00 UTC
14:36:32 sean-k-mooney or maybe firday
14:36:33 chandankumar no issues
14:36:41 chandankumar friday is also fine
14:36:41 jgilaber that's on Tuesday?

Earlier   Later