| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2026-03-10 | |||
| 14:25:37 | sean-k-mooney | well nova has more then one conf it uses with mutlipe variables | |
| 14:25:48 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. NOVA_CPU_CONF | |
| 14:25:50 | sean-k-mooney | i think | |
| 14:26:14 | sean-k-mooney | we could make this change im just not sure it by us much | |
| 14:27:10 | sean-k-mooney | if we do this i woudl make it fallback to the old name | |
| 14:28:08 | sean-k-mooney | so CYBORG_CONF=${CYBORG_CONF:-${CYBORG_CONF_FILE}} | |
| 14:28:10 | chandankumar | ok make sense, It will not break existing user | |
| 14:28:25 | chandankumar | I will update the review after this call. | |
| 14:28:51 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 14:29:05 | chandankumar | since there is no more reviews moving to next topic | |
| 14:29:09 | chandankumar | #topic Bugs | |
| 14:29:30 | chandankumar | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/1954888 Docs: state how to use bound accelerators | |
| 14:29:39 | chandankumar | we discussed this bug in the last meeting | |
| 14:30:44 | sean-k-mooney | ya so im incliend to ether use this to track descirbing how to create the nova flavor and device profile | |
| 14:30:51 | sean-k-mooney | and that workflow | |
| 14:30:51 | bogdando[m] | looks like it should stay deferred unless standalone cyborg gets on the radar | |
| 14:31:08 | sean-k-mooney | or using it to track a contibutor doc or closing as wont fix | |
| 14:31:30 | sean-k-mooney | right standalon cyborg is not really a thing today so we shoudl nto have end user docs for that | |
| 14:31:46 | sean-k-mooney | so either we have a conceptal do for devleoper/contibutors | |
| 14:32:02 | sean-k-mooney | or we docuemnt the nova flow for end admins ro end users | |
| 14:32:13 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont think we shoudl spend time on stand alone | |
| 14:32:35 | sean-k-mooney | we could close this and create 2 seperate bugs for those other two docs gaps | |
| 14:32:41 | jgilaber | +1 I think there is value in documenting the standard workflow using nova, but I would not go further than that for now | |
| 14:33:41 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. 1 for admin doc for configuing and testign the standard wrokflow and 2 a contibutor doc to serve as a technial deep dive/refence of howt he services interact? | |
| 14:34:44 | chandankumar | Do we have a reference for nova flow doc link which we can add as a reference in the bug? | |
| 14:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think this really exist out side fo the spec today | |
| 14:35:50 | sean-k-mooney | i dont recall htere being a nova doc for ti but there may be | |
| 14:36:56 | chandankumar | ok | |
| 14:36:58 | sean-k-mooney | i will file 2 seperate bugs and close this when done | |
| 14:37:15 | chandankumar | thanks sean-k-mooney! | |
| 14:37:20 | sean-k-mooney | i can likely create a draft for the docs in the next few weeks if no one else does | |
| 14:37:46 | chandankumar | ok | |
| 14:38:01 | chandankumar | any more question on this bug. | |
| 14:38:18 | chandankumar | moving to next one | |
| 14:38:29 | chandankumar | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/1955285 arq delete no valid | |
| 14:39:23 | sean-k-mooney | that is just invliad | |
| 14:39:52 | sean-k-mooney | openstack accelerator arq delete c48f5ac0-0bff-44c0-9106-1850b355c5ca woudl be deliting arq c48f5ac0-0bff-44c0-9106-1850b355c5ca | |
| 14:39:57 | sean-k-mooney | not the arq for instance c48f5ac0-0bff-44c0-9106-1850b355c5ca | |
| 14:40:33 | sean-k-mooney | we might have a docs bug or a help text bug if it imples its the vm uuid | |
| 14:41:12 | bogdando[m] | how reasonable is having this in CLI assuming only service user should be allowed to do that low level things for/via nova? | |
| 14:41:13 | sean-k-mooney | but that is not what "openstack accelerator arq delete" means per the openstack client naming conventions | |
| 14:41:44 | sean-k-mooney | bogdando[m]: it some thing we will need to enfoce going forard | |
| 14:41:46 | jgilaber | there is an api call to delete arqs using the instance uuid Ie1894311b0e384ab52b1b3dfe0eb50618eef6c9f | |
| 14:41:56 | jgilaber | sorry pasted wrong | |
| 14:42:01 | jgilaber | https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/accelerator/#delete-accelerator-requests-by-instance-uuid | |
| 14:42:04 | sean-k-mooney | its only vaild for a user to delete an arq if its not asssocated with an instance | |
| 14:42:49 | sean-k-mooney | ack let me review that seperatly | |
| 14:42:59 | sean-k-mooney | this clie shoudl be callign the other one | |
| 14:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | /v2/accelerator_requests?arqs={accelerator_request_uuid} not /v2/accelerator_requests?instance={instance_uuid} | |
| 14:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | both exist and the nameing convetion of osc woudl requrie we call the first path | |
| 14:43:44 | sean-k-mooney | to call the second we woudl need --instance or similar | |
| 14:43:58 | sean-k-mooney | but the secodn is invlid from my persective | |
| 14:44:26 | sean-k-mooney | im saying that as a nova core not a cybrog one | |
| 14:44:39 | bogdando[m] | the original use case seemed to be remove all arqs for a running instance | |
| 14:45:11 | sean-k-mooney | yep that not supproted by nova | |
| 14:45:16 | jgilaber | for what is worth the usage test of openstack accelerator arq delete is clear enough | |
| 14:45:29 | jgilaber | usage: openstack accelerator arq delete [-h] <uuid> [<uuid> ... | |
| 14:45:38 | jgilaber | <uuid> UUID(s) of the accelerator_request(s) to delete. | |
| 14:45:44 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 14:45:46 | jgilaber | no mentions of instance uuids | |
| 14:45:56 | sean-k-mooney | that confims the expecation in the bug reprot is incorect | |
| 14:46:16 | jgilaber | yep, we can close it | |
| 14:46:25 | bogdando[m] | at least for now | |
| 14:46:41 | sean-k-mooney | i willl likely need to adress /v2/accelerator_requests?instance={instance_uuid} in my srback spec | |
| 14:46:53 | sean-k-mooney | but i suspect wwe will need to remove it in a future microversion | |
| 14:47:00 | sean-k-mooney | ill dig into the history of it | |
| 14:47:02 | bogdando[m] | may be it makes sense in future, as housekeeping things, like defragment vram to allow repartitioning | |
| 14:47:54 | sean-k-mooney | lets not specualte on it now | |
| 14:48:00 | bogdando[m] | ack | |
| 14:48:23 | sean-k-mooney | jgilaber: do you want to leave a comment on the bug or will i | |
| 14:48:30 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl liek to link to the doc sting when closing it | |
| 14:48:34 | chandankumar | https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/commit/1f9a808f1d965063a2744c6ea6ddeb76a5d57061 adds some does around second option | |
| 14:48:37 | jgilaber | I can do it | |
| 14:48:42 | sean-k-mooney | jgilaber: ++ | |
| 14:49:42 | sean-k-mooney | chandankumar nova only supprots 1 ARQ today | |
| 14:50:00 | sean-k-mooney | i think this was added in preperation for cybrog device via neuton ports | |
| 14:50:10 | sean-k-mooney | since that fits the time frame but that never happend in nova or neutron | |
| 14:51:04 | chandankumar | ok | |
| 14:51:11 | sean-k-mooney | shall we move on to the next bug or finish early? | |
| 14:51:16 | chandankumar | yes | |
| 14:51:25 | chandankumar | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/1955286 cyborg cmd exec meeting keystone authentication fail | |
| 14:53:31 | sean-k-mooney | that looks like a deployment isseu | |
| 14:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | they are gettign a 401 form the micoversion endpoint | |
| 14:53:55 | sean-k-mooney | which shoudl not requrie auth | |
| 14:54:10 | sean-k-mooney | so without more info mation i think we close this as incompl.ete | |
| 14:54:24 | sean-k-mooney | bases on the path this looks liek a devstack deployment not production | |
| 14:54:37 | sean-k-mooney | /opt/stack/data/CA/int-ca/ca-chain.pem | |
| 14:54:51 | sean-k-mooney | /opt/stack/data is where devstack store service state | |
| 14:55:31 | chandankumar | I will take care of this one | |
| 14:55:44 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 14:55:58 | chandankumar | there is one more bug, but I will move it to next meeting | |
| 14:56:03 | sean-k-mooney | we could see if we have the same bevhior in our local devstack but i dont think this si a real issue | |
| 14:56:08 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 14:56:20 | chandankumar | moving to last topic | |
| 14:56:31 | chandankumar | #topic volunteer for next meeting | |
| 14:56:40 | rlandy | I'll do it since I skipped my last round | |
| 14:56:50 | chandankumar | thanks rlandy ! | |
| 14:56:59 | chandankumar | #topic open discussion | |
| 14:57:13 | chandankumar | Anyone wants to bring any topic before closing the meeting. | |
| 14:58:44 | chandankumar | if not, then let me close the meeting | |