| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-28 | |||
| 02:17:14 | Sundar | Hi chenke | |
| 02:17:30 | chenke | Hi Sundar. | |
| 02:18:32 | chenke | You expect the return status code of get_all to be 423, right? | |
| 02:23:13 | Sundar | Yes | |
| 02:23:39 | Sundar | If one or more ARQS is still being bound | |
| 02:23:54 | Sundar | i.e. not successful or BindFailed | |
| 02:26:17 | chenke | like BindStarted? | |
| 02:27:47 | Sundar | Yes | |
| 02:28:36 | chenke | Now It return 200. | |
| 02:32:48 | Sundar | I think so. | |
| 02:34:09 | chenke | Ok. I am debugging it. | |
| 03:00:53 | Sundar | Hello all | |
| 03:01:09 | Sundar | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:01:10 | openstack | Meeting started Thu Nov 28 03:01:09 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sundar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:01:11 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:01:13 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:01:17 | s_shogo | Hi all | |
| 03:01:26 | Sundar | #topic Agenda and status | |
| 03:01:38 | Sundar | Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda | |
| 03:02:12 | Sundar | Hi s_shogo, may be we can wait a couple of min. | |
| 03:02:46 | chenke | Hi all | |
| 03:02:58 | s_shogo | Hi Sundar , OK,NP | |
| 03:03:03 | xinranwang | Hi all | |
| 03:03:10 | Coco_gao_ | Hi all | |
| 03:03:49 | Yumeng | #info Yumeng | |
| 03:03:50 | Yumeng | hi all | |
| 03:04:07 | chenke | #info chenke | |
| 03:04:18 | Sundar | Hi all | |
| 03:04:26 | s_shogo | #info s_shogo | |
| 03:04:42 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:04:46 | Sundar | Looks like we got a quorum. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda | |
| 03:05:05 | Sundar | Anything to add? | |
| 03:05:29 | Coco_gao_ | #info Coco_gao | |
| 03:05:42 | shaohe_feng | #info shaohe_feng | |
| 03:05:53 | shaohe_feng | morning Coco_gao | |
| 03:06:07 | shaohe_feng | evening Sundar | |
| 03:06:20 | xinranwang | Sundar: no from me, please go ahead | |
| 03:06:29 | Sundar | #topic v1 API | |
| 03:06:42 | Sundar | Interesting discussion in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690539/ | |
| 03:07:47 | Sundar | I was thinking that we deprecated v1 API in Train and so we can remove it in Ussuri. There could be other opinions. Should we keep it or drop it? | |
| 03:10:22 | Sundar | Yumeng, chenke, xinranwang, s_shogo, shaohe_feng Coco_gao_: ^ | |
| 03:11:57 | shaohe_feng | How many users are using V1? | |
| 03:12:01 | Coco_gao_ | According to Openstack rules, it's OK to deprecate v1 API in Ussuri, right? | |
| 03:12:21 | Sundar | Probably nobody in production. Maybe a few users like s_shogo could be using it in a lab? | |
| 03:12:58 | s_shogo | I'm using v2 API. v2 API covers v1's role, removing is OK, IMO. | |
| 03:13:00 | Sundar | Coco_gao_: we already deprecated it in Train. Are you asking can we leave it in deprecated state in Ussuri? | |
| 03:13:10 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:13:24 | xinranwang | The v1 definition of deployable and accelerator may confused people who wanna look into cyborg, | |
| 03:13:44 | Sundar | xinranwang: good point, agree | |
| 03:13:49 | s_shogo | xinranwang +1 | |
| 03:13:55 | xinranwang | I have got such kind of confusion from others. | |
| 03:15:24 | Coco_gao_ | V1 and V2 are so different. I prefer to remove v1 in Ussuri. | |
| 03:16:03 | Sundar | Anybody against removing v1 API in Ussuri? | |
| 03:16:28 | chenke | remove +1. | |
| 03:17:18 | xinranwang | Cause v2 API is not complete yet, we should at least let other know that there is no need to look into V1 and get a wrong picture. | |
| 03:17:27 | Sundar | Yumeng: since you had a different opinion, please let me know if we have missed some point or alternative view to consider. | |
| 03:17:37 | Yumeng | ok. we don't want cause confusions. Since that, I can remove api-ref v1 and not keep it as deprecated status. and move deployable to v2 | |
| 03:18:04 | Coco_gao_ | Let's focus on V2 | |
| 03:18:08 | Sundar | Good, it is also less work, because we don't need to document v1 API. | |
| 03:18:22 | Sundar | #agreed Remove v1 API in Usuri. | |
| 03:18:26 | Yumeng | move deployable to v2 and delete v1 accelerator | |
| 03:18:27 | s_shogo | I'll modify the python-client, to remove the v1 implementation. (correspondly to the controller patch) | |
| 03:18:45 | Sundar | Thanks, s_shogo and all | |
| 03:18:49 | Sundar | #topic Programming API proposal review | |
| 03:19:05 | Sundar | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-ussuri-programming-apis | |
| 03:19:14 | Sundar | Did anybody have a chance to review this? | |
| 03:20:24 | Sundar | If not, we can schedule it for next week. | |
| 03:21:24 | xinranwang | Ok | |
| 03:21:30 | Sundar | I suspect people are reading it now. :) | |
| 03:21:37 | Coco_gao_ | reading now | |
| 03:22:06 | Sundar | Cool, Please comment in the etherpad and we can revisit next week. | |
| 03:22:20 | Sundar | #topic Functional tests update | |
| 03:22:24 | xinranwang | As the programming API (device layer) will be seperated from other general device API, i will remove firmware upgrade part from my device API spec . | |
| 03:22:57 | Li_Liu | I took a quick look on the functional test part | |
| 03:23:33 | Li_Liu | I am drafting a test plan for that | |
| 03:23:57 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Great. Good to know that. Will that be in an etherpad? | |
| 03:24:28 | Sundar | xinranwang: Ok | |
| 03:25:11 | Li_Liu | I will put it on etherpad | |
| 03:26:08 | Sundar | Thanks, Li_Liu | |
| 03:26:23 | Sundar | #topic Storyboard review and update | |
| 03:26:44 | Li_Liu | np | |
| 03:26:45 | Sundar | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/cyborg | |
| 03:27:47 | Sundar | I put in the major Ussuri goals from the PTG, and cleaned up some of the old ones. Please feel free to add or update the entries. | |
| 03:28:06 | Sundar | But, if you want to delete something, please check with the group first. | |
| 03:28:54 | Sundar | Many of them are still open. | |
| 03:30:00 | Sundar | Please take a look and update the ones with your name as you go along. | |
| 03:30:41 | Sundar | #topic Status of patches | |
| 03:31:56 | Coco_gao_ | Have someone taken some of the tasks? | |
| 03:31:57 | s_shogo | python-client :v2/sdk patches are still under review, pls review this :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/681391/ ) | |
| 03:32:00 | Sundar | shaohe_feng: Do you want to update us on multi-host devstack setup? Or do you need input from us on the config table? | |
| 03:32:53 | shaohe_feng | I will update a new patch for program as you comments in the patch | |
| 03:33:13 | Sundar | Some tasks have assignees. if a task has no owner assigned to it, it is open. | |
| 03:33:32 | shaohe_feng | for the storyboard just list 2 issues. | |
| 03:33:49 | Sundar | shaoehe_feng: You mean a patch to improve the fake driver for programming? | |
| 03:34:00 | shaohe_feng | yes. | |
| 03:34:12 | shaohe_feng | the patch just cover the storyborad. | |
| 03:34:30 | shaohe_feng | we should not mix many issues in one patches. | |
| 03:35:06 | Sundar | OK. If you want to spli them into different patches, that's fine. May be one for the conf settings, one for fake driver? | |
| 03:36:00 | shaohe_feng | one for the current storyboard | |
| 03:36:00 | Yumeng | Coco_gao_: some are taken, there are still tasks left not taken by people. --.-- | |