Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-21
04:08:02 s_shogo (repost)
05:11:31 chenke bye~
08:07:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cyborg master: Set compute API microversion to 'latest' when calling Nova. https://review.opendev.org/694856
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-22
09:01:33 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: BugFix: FakeDirver put RC FPGA error https://review.opendev.org/695644
10:08:23 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Implementation of Device v2 API https://review.opendev.org/695648
10:09:03 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Implementation of Device v2 API https://review.opendev.org/695648
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-23
10:05:51 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: deprecate v1 add v2 device_profile section https://review.opendev.org/690539
12:21:57 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: deprecate v1 add v2 device_profile section https://review.opendev.org/690539
12:34:41 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: Add accelerator requests(ARQs) section https://review.opendev.org/691306
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-24
09:54:00 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: deprecate v1 add v2 device_profile section https://review.opendev.org/690539
11:10:41 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: deprecate v1 add v2 device_profile section https://review.opendev.org/690539
11:10:42 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: Add accelerator requests(ARQs) section https://review.opendev.org/691306
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-25
05:58:35 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification for Device V2 API. https://review.opendev.org/695840
06:08:56 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Update api-ref: Add accelerator requests(ARQs) section https://review.opendev.org/691306
06:45:27 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification for Device V2 API. https://review.opendev.org/695840
09:27:15 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Remove api in doc https://review.opendev.org/695860
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-26
00:21:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cyborg master: BugFix: FakeDirver put RC FPGA error https://review.opendev.org/695644
02:48:38 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add Ussuri spec path in doc/index.rst https://review.opendev.org/696011
02:48:38 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Re-propose specification for Cyborg APIs Version 2 https://review.opendev.org/695840
02:48:39 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Update device section in Cyborg V2 APIs specification. https://review.opendev.org/696012
04:19:13 openstackgerrit Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Address the hostname problem mentioned https://review.opendev.org/696014
05:09:46 openstackgerrit Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Address the hostname problem mentioned https://review.opendev.org/696014
05:14:46 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Re-propose specification for Cyborg APIs Version 2 https://review.opendev.org/695840
05:32:46 openstackgerrit Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add Ussuri spec path in doc/index.rst https://review.opendev.org/696011
06:58:20 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve objects/attach_handle.py UT coverage from 68% to 100% https://review.opendev.org/696023
08:04:53 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: Enable UT for objects/deployable.py and fix import error https://review.opendev.org/696032
11:22:32 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix report the max limit of acceleration resources to the placement https://review.opendev.org/696065
12:16:44 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix report the max limit of acceleration resources to the placement https://review.opendev.org/696065
12:46:32 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: BugFix: modify the max allocation limit of acceleration resources https://review.opendev.org/696065
13:58:39 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor v2 arq api https://review.opendev.org/696089
14:08:36 openstackgerrit YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor v2 arq api https://review.opendev.org/696089
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-27
09:17:53 openstackgerrit ShangXiao proposed openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin master: Fix a typo https://review.opendev.org/696252
19:32:38 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor _gen_resource_inventory https://review.opendev.org/696393
19:42:05 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: WIP: Set ignore_basepython_conflict (and run pep8) https://review.opendev.org/696397
20:45:03 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: DNM: Make sure pep8 is running in the gate https://review.opendev.org/696405
20:45:03 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: WIP: Set ignore_basepython_conflict (and run pep8) https://review.opendev.org/696397
21:07:08 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: Set ignore_basepython_conflict (fixes confusing pep8 message) https://review.opendev.org/696397
21:16:18 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/cyborg master: Set ignore_basepython_conflict (fixes confusing pep8 message) https://review.opendev.org/696397
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-11-28
02:17:14 Sundar Hi chenke
02:17:30 chenke Hi Sundar.
02:18:32 chenke You expect the return status code of get_all to be 423, right?
02:23:13 Sundar Yes
02:23:39 Sundar If one or more ARQS is still being bound
02:23:54 Sundar i.e. not successful or BindFailed
02:26:17 chenke like BindStarted?
02:27:47 Sundar Yes
02:28:36 chenke Now It return 200.
02:32:48 Sundar I think so.
02:34:09 chenke Ok. I am debugging it.
03:00:53 Sundar Hello all
03:01:09 Sundar #startmeeting openstack-cyborg
03:01:10 openstack Meeting started Thu Nov 28 03:01:09 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sundar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
03:01:11 openstack Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
03:01:13 openstack The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg'
03:01:17 s_shogo Hi all
03:01:26 Sundar #topic Agenda and status
03:01:38 Sundar Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda
03:02:12 Sundar Hi s_shogo, may be we can wait a couple of min.
03:02:46 chenke Hi all
03:02:58 s_shogo Hi Sundar , OK,NP
03:03:03 xinranwang Hi all
03:03:10 Coco_gao_ Hi all
03:03:49 Yumeng #info Yumeng
03:03:50 Yumeng hi all
03:04:07 chenke #info chenke
03:04:18 Sundar Hi all
03:04:26 s_shogo #info s_shogo
03:04:42 xinranwang #info xinranwang
03:04:46 Sundar Looks like we got a quorum. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda
03:05:05 Sundar Anything to add?
03:05:29 Coco_gao_ #info Coco_gao
03:05:42 shaohe_feng #info shaohe_feng
03:05:53 shaohe_feng morning Coco_gao
03:06:07 shaohe_feng evening Sundar
03:06:20 xinranwang Sundar: no from me, please go ahead
03:06:29 Sundar #topic v1 API
03:06:42 Sundar Interesting discussion in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690539/
03:07:47 Sundar I was thinking that we deprecated v1 API in Train and so we can remove it in Ussuri. There could be other opinions. Should we keep it or drop it?
03:10:22 Sundar Yumeng, chenke, xinranwang, s_shogo, shaohe_feng Coco_gao_: ^
03:11:57 shaohe_feng How many users are using V1?
03:12:01 Coco_gao_ According to Openstack rules, it's OK to deprecate v1 API in Ussuri, right?
03:12:21 Sundar Probably nobody in production. Maybe a few users like s_shogo could be using it in a lab?
03:12:58 s_shogo I'm using v2 API. v2 API covers v1's role, removing is OK, IMO.
03:13:00 Sundar Coco_gao_: we already deprecated it in Train. Are you asking can we leave it in deprecated state in Ussuri?
03:13:10 Li_Liu #info Li_Liu
03:13:24 xinranwang The v1 definition of deployable and accelerator may confused people who wanna look into cyborg,
03:13:44 Sundar xinranwang: good point, agree
03:13:49 s_shogo xinranwang +1
03:13:55 xinranwang I have got such kind of confusion from others.
03:15:24 Coco_gao_ V1 and V2 are so different. I prefer to remove v1 in Ussuri.
03:16:03 Sundar Anybody against removing v1 API in Ussuri?
03:16:28 chenke remove +1.
03:17:18 xinranwang Cause v2 API is not complete yet, we should at least let other know that there is no need to look into V1 and get a wrong picture.
03:17:27 Sundar Yumeng: since you had a different opinion, please let me know if we have missed some point or alternative view to consider.
03:17:37 Yumeng ok. we don't want cause confusions. Since that, I can remove api-ref v1 and not keep it as deprecated status. and move deployable to v2
03:18:04 Coco_gao_ Let's focus on V2
03:18:08 Sundar Good, it is also less work, because we don't need to document v1 API.
03:18:22 Sundar #agreed Remove v1 API in Usuri.
03:18:26 Yumeng move deployable to v2 and delete v1 accelerator
03:18:27 s_shogo I'll modify the python-client, to remove the v1 implementation. (correspondly to the controller patch)

Earlier   Later