Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2019-09-26
03:35:42 shaohe_feng pros and cons?
03:36:16 Sundar You can ask Eric in that patch. Nova has some requirements and considerable interest in this area.
03:36:33 shaohe_feng OK.
03:37:16 Sundar Are there any other patches that are potential RC blockers, i.e, have security or critical implications, so we should hold up the release?
03:37:29 shaohe_feng maybe we can do more investigation on it. but not now
03:37:37 shaohe_feng now we have more things to do.
03:39:10 Sundar Sure. If nothing else, let us please focus on reviewing the ones above first, and as much of the rest as we can. It is possible that there may be future RCs, so they may still make it
03:40:00 Sundar Any other comments or thoughts?
03:40:01 Yumeng https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679406/ this one please
03:40:15 Yumeng conductor writes device_profile
03:40:33 Sundar Yumeng: sure. IMHO, it is mostly there. I'll try it out tonight and review it
03:40:46 Yumeng just updated.
03:40:55 Yumeng thanks!
03:41:33 Sundar Shaohe, have you tried your patch with the Nova patches?
03:41:49 shaohe_feng yes.
03:41:55 Sundar Great
03:41:59 shaohe_feng xinranwang also help to do it.
03:42:09 Sundar Thanks to both of you
03:42:28 Sundar Anything else, folks?
03:42:35 shaohe_feng actually, I did not change your code logical
03:42:51 shaohe_feng just put them in thread pool as async job. :)
03:43:10 Sundar Cool, np even if you changed it, as long as it works :)
03:43:23 xinranwang This patch is almost good for me
03:44:01 Sundar almost?
03:44:43 Sundar Anyway, we can continue the review in Gerrit.
03:44:55 xinranwang “Almost”means need other’s review as well
03:45:17 chenke About this patch:https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684193/
03:45:33 chenke I agree with xinran's idea.
03:45:53 Sundar Do you want to see 6 endpoints with devstack? :)
03:46:05 Sundar v1 is end-of-life.
03:46:06 chenke no
03:46:11 chenke We don't need to enable v1.
03:46:14 Sundar After Train, we can remove it early in U
03:47:37 Sundar Can you explain further, chenke? v1 is deprecated but supported in this release. So, we do the bare minimum to keep it alive, but don't bother develoeprs with legacy endpoints
03:48:20 Sundar We can remove v1 altogether early in U, and even these devstack comments will go away
03:49:16 chenke Sorry, I misunderstood this meaning.
03:49:16 Sundar Anybody disagree?
03:49:24 chenke just go on.
03:49:35 Sundar You are ok with that patch as is?
03:50:34 Sundar Anyway, let's continue the review in Gerrit
03:50:39 chenke +1
03:50:55 Sundar If nothing else, we can call it a day (or night or afternoon)
03:51:36 Sundar Have a good day, everyone! Bye for now. (I'll bother you on WeChat after this -- JK)
03:51:42 Sundar #endmeeting
03:51:44 openstack Meeting ended Thu Sep 26 03:51:42 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
03:51:45 openstack Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2019/openstack_cyborg.2019-09-26-03.01.html
03:51:46 openstack Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2019/openstack_cyborg.2019-09-26-03.01.txt
03:51:47 openstack Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2019/openstack_cyborg.2019-09-26-03.01.log.html
03:52:37 chenke Bye~ all
03:54:20 Sundar chenke -- the latest tempest run failed too
03:54:36 chenke could you give me the address
03:54:47 chenke detail log address.
03:54:51 Sundar https://openstack.fortnebula.com:13808/v1/AUTH_e8fd161dc34c421a979a9e6421f823e9/zuul_opendev_logs_c00/670999/12/check/cyborg-tempest/c00ce63/controller/logs/screen-cyborg-api.txt.gz
03:55:28 Sundar Sep 25 14:33:08.765936 --- Server-side error: "Failed to create a working proxy for service compute: No valid endpoint was discoverable."
03:56:26 chenke Now time is ?
03:57:01 chenke I want to confirm if it is the latest log.
03:57:08 Sundar It is in UTC
03:57:32 Sundar I see, it could be old?
03:57:54 chenke I am not sure.
03:58:08 Sundar Seems like old one -- never mind, false alarm ;)
03:58:15 chenke Ok~
03:58:24 Sundar I need to leave now, will be back in 30 min or so
03:58:31 chenke https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/stream/fa3f4faccb0744cb9e019cae42b1102d?logfile=console.log
03:58:36 chenke this is new.
03:58:42 chenke Ok. the same to me.
03:58:52 chenke I will back after 90min.
06:12:03 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Program FPGAs with oslo.privsep. https://review.opendev.org/683733
06:27:19 openstackgerrit zhurong proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix delete arq 403 failed https://review.opendev.org/684947
07:28:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cyborg master: Enable fake_driver by default https://review.opendev.org/684712
08:28:46 openstackgerrit chenker proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix delete arq 403 failed https://review.opendev.org/684947
09:00:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cyborg master: Implement privsep boilerplate in cyborg. https://review.opendev.org/673957
10:42:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cyborg master: conductor writes device_profile update to db https://review.opendev.org/679406
11:08:04 Sundar Hi zhurong
11:12:11 zhurong Hi Sundar
11:12:38 Sundar Hi zhurong, thanks for all your contribution and reviews.
11:12:53 Sundar I'd like to talk about https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684193/3
11:13:22 Sundar OpenStack has a bacwards compat requirement. We have been releasing CYborg since Queens cycle.
11:13:44 Sundar We have had v1 API for some time, developed it in Stein but also marked it as deprecated
11:14:26 zhurong yeah, I think we should give people more clearly message, when will remove the V
11:14:29 Sundar We cannot remove it right away in Train. We must keep it for 1 release.
11:14:41 zhurong yeah, I think we should give people more clearly message, when will remove the V1 API
11:14:50 Sundar So, we are keeping it in Train and will remove it in U
11:16:05 Sundar Meanwhile we don't see anybody using it given its current state. So, we are doing the minimum to keep it alive. If anybody wrote scripts to play with it, they will return some meaningful value like [] or None, but not crash
11:16:19 Sundar Early in U, we can remove it
11:16:38 zhurong Now the message only said we deprecated v1 api, but don't give the time clearly.
11:16:54 Sundar Others gave -1 and retracted after explanation.
11:17:16 Sundar Ok, I believe the standard practice is 1 cycle
11:17:32 Sundar We don't have to keep it longer
11:18:43 zhurong sorry for the later rely, I have a meeting this afternoon, so I didn't have time to watch the review process
11:18:45 Sundar Not sure we can just remove it just like that, unless you know of some exception
11:19:28 Sundar NP. Do you agree with the explanation for the v1 API?
11:21:54 zhurong I agree with you. In my comment, I said if we don't remove in this cycle, we should make the deprecated message more cleary, tell usr and developer when we will remove the v1 API. just edit the deprecated message add the we will remove in U cycle.
11:23:51 Sundar Ah I see, sure
11:24:03 Sundar We have to update all the docs
11:31:54 zhurong that's my point, Sundar, I will remove the -1
11:33:32 Sundar Thanks, zhurong.
11:42:22 donnyd Could we get some reviews of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677715/2
11:44:02 Sundar donnyd: Yes, I'll ask for reviews and do it myself too. Trying to find the deadline for docs
11:44:37 donnyd Sundar: you are either up really early or really late
11:45:15 Sundar Both :)

Earlier   Later