| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-07 | |||
| 19:15:52 | egallen | Hello | |
| 19:17:44 | egallen | I’m testing to flash manually one Intel RushCreek A10 PAC card | |
| 19:18:02 | egallen | It worked for a first card, and not for a second | |
| 19:18:46 | egallen | Do you know how to fix this: | |
| 19:18:47 | egallen | (error) A problem occurred while programming the BMC | |
| 19:18:48 | egallen | (error) The BMC upgrade device is still active | |
| 19:18:49 | egallen | Try running "/opt/bwtk/2017.4L/bin/bwdfu-programmer" bittware_dfu reset | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-08 | |||
| 01:48:22 | Sundar | egallen: Got your message. Will follow up. | |
| 07:22:51 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel sysinfo based FPGA driver https://review.opendev.org/657743 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-09 | |||
| 07:42:36 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: New Cyborg Generic Driver Proposal https://review.opendev.org/655125 | |
| 08:22:09 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: New Cyborg Generic Driver Proposal https://review.opendev.org/655125 | |
| 08:22:20 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel sysinfo based FPGA driver https://review.opendev.org/657743 | |
| 10:11:08 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel sysinfo based FPGA driver https://review.opendev.org/657743 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-10 | |||
| 04:50:51 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification for Cyborg APIs Version 2. https://review.opendev.org/658263 | |
| 08:16:08 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: New Cyborg Generic Driver Proposal https://review.opendev.org/655125 | |
| 22:40:44 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Fix the release name in index.rst. https://review.opendev.org/658498 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-14 | |||
| 08:55:36 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add the new generic driver https://review.opendev.org/658987 | |
| 08:55:36 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Remove the old generic driver https://review.opendev.org/658986 | |
| 10:03:16 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add serialization/deserialization for control_path.cpid_info https://review.opendev.org/659014 | |
| 11:13:28 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Remove the old generic driver https://review.opendev.org/658986 | |
| 11:28:19 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add the new generic driver https://review.opendev.org/658987 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-15 | |||
| 02:54:04 | Sundar | Cyborg weekly IRC call in 8 min | |
| 02:54:19 | Sundar | Make it 6 min | |
| 02:59:54 | Sundar | Hi Xinran | |
| 03:00:27 | xinranwang | Hi Sundar | |
| 03:00:34 | Sundar | Will wait for 2 min for folks to join | |
| 03:00:41 | Li_Liu | HI guys | |
| 03:00:45 | Sundar | Hi Li | |
| 03:00:55 | Li_Liu | I am in China right now | |
| 03:01:03 | wangzhh | Hi all. | |
| 03:01:10 | Sundar | Hi wangzhh | |
| 03:01:35 | Sundar | Coco said she can't make it. Let's get started then | |
| 03:01:43 | Sundar | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:01:44 | openstack | Meeting started Wed May 15 03:01:43 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sundar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:01:45 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:01:47 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:01:52 | Sundar | #topic Roll call | |
| 03:01:54 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:02:02 | wangzhh | #info wangzhh | |
| 03:02:03 | Sundar | #info Sundar | |
| 03:02:03 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:02:17 | ikuo_o | #info ikuo_o | |
| 03:02:24 | wangzhh | Hi ikuo_o. | |
| 03:02:35 | ikuo_o | Hi wangzhh. | |
| 03:02:43 | Sundar | Please see agenda for today at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting | |
| 03:02:58 | Sundar | Does anybody have anything else to add to it? | |
| 03:03:25 | ikuo_o | Thanks Sundar. | |
| 03:03:54 | Sundar | #topic Cyborg specs reviews | |
| 03:04:02 | Yumeng | #info Yumeng | |
| 03:04:07 | Yumeng | Hi all | |
| 03:04:30 | Sundar | Hi Yumeng | |
| 03:04:35 | wangzhh | Morning Yumeng. | |
| 03:04:37 | Sundar | Top 4 specs in: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg-specs | |
| 03:05:16 | Sundar | Can we get these 4 reviewed over the next few days? | |
| 03:05:26 | ikuo_o | I and my colleagues are checking "Specification for Cyborg APIs Version 2". | |
| 03:05:31 | Li_Liu | I will try my best | |
| 03:05:44 | Sundar | Thanks, ikuo_o, Li_Liu. | |
| 03:05:50 | wangzhh | Sure. | |
| 03:06:15 | Sundar | Great. Thanks wangzhh | |
| 03:06:23 | Sundar | #topic Nova spec review | |
| 03:06:43 | Sundar | Lots of discussion in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/603955/ | |
| 03:06:56 | Li_Liu | lol | |
| 03:07:02 | Li_Liu | a lot of comments | |
| 03:07:27 | Sundar | Does Huawei want a standard accelerator name for Ascend? | |
| 03:07:35 | Sundar | Only FPGA and GPU for now | |
| 03:07:46 | Li_Liu | Yes | |
| 03:07:58 | Li_Liu | Ascend is on our agenda | |
| 03:08:25 | Li_Liu | Does it need to be mentioned in the nova spec? | |
| 03:08:30 | Sundar | Li_iu: Good. Just to be sure, instead of CUSTOM_ASCEND, you want ASCNED to be added to os-resource-classes, right? | |
| 03:08:51 | Li_Liu | you can check this with Yikun | |
| 03:08:55 | Sundar | Yes, efried has said that explicitly. | |
| 03:09:13 | yikun | #info Yikun | |
| 03:09:25 | Sundar | Hi Yikun, just in time :) | |
| 03:09:32 | yikun | sorry for late | |
| 03:10:23 | Sundar | NP. For Ascend, can we use a custom resource class name like CUSTOM_ASCEND? Or do you want to standardize it? We are standardizing only FPGA and GPU as of now | |
| 03:11:59 | wangzhh | Is 'Ascend' popular like GPU or FPGA? | |
| 03:12:16 | ikuo_o | I don't know much about ascend... | |
| 03:12:30 | yikun | FPGA GPU is the device type, but ascend maybe is not a standard type just a series, so I think maybe ascend should be cover in some thing like TPU_ASCEND or something | |
| 03:12:52 | Sundar | Perhaps it is best to leave it as a custom RC for now. | |
| 03:12:54 | Li_Liu | TPU is very google specific | |
| 03:13:08 | yikun | sorry, NPU | |
| 03:13:18 | Sundar | If we propose a standard name, it should be added to the spec, justified and also proposed as a Nova patch. | |
| 03:13:31 | Sundar | yikun, I believe you have an AI chip and a security-related accelerator? | |
| 03:14:08 | Sundar | NPU can also mean Network processing Unit. NNP = neural network processor | |
| 03:14:41 | yikun | for now, only AI chip, security-related accelerator comes from intel qat. | |
| 03:15:47 | Sundar | yikun: OK. You can think about it. I am hoping to converge the Nova spec by May end, while we still have the momentum and attention. | |
| 03:16:06 | yikun | Sundar: ok, sure | |
| 03:16:21 | Sundar | #topic Pilot merge plan | |
| 03:16:48 | Sundar | I understand some of you find the merged patch to be very large to review. Is that the reason why we are not getting many reviews? | |
| 03:18:27 | Sundar | Another way of asking: can you all review the code soon, or suggest ways to get the reviews done? | |
| 03:18:29 | Sundar | :) | |
| 03:19:02 | Li_Liu | btw, regarding changing from polling to event driven between nova and Cyborg, I just modify based on the pilot branch right? | |
| 03:19:20 | Li_Liu | or submit a seperated patch? | |
| 03:20:05 | Sundar | Li_Liu: I am using the pilot code for various demos from now till mid-June. It will be best not to disrupt the pilot patches. | |
| 03:20:06 | wangzhh | I'm fine with big patch or smaller one. | |
| 03:21:01 | Li_Liu | Sundar, sure, I will keep it clean in a different patch | |
| 03:21:29 | Sundar | Li_Liu and all: I am bit worried about what Nova guys are suggesting: there is no quantitative data on how it will affect Cyborg, right? FPGA programming can take a few seconds, and we are reducing that window of wait if we move the bind to the compute node | |
| 03:21:32 | Li_Liu | for now I will try to review the spec and pilot branch | |
| 03:21:56 | wangzhh | Li_liu, submit a seperated patch is OK. And pls add sundar's commit as a dependence. | |
| 03:22:31 | Sundar | We should try to get some idea of how much the window gets reduced in different scenarios, like launch 1 VM, launch 2 VMs together, etc. | |