| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-11 | |||
| 04:32:13 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Let the fpga programming api call cyborg agent https://review.openstack.org/596507 | |
| 10:28:49 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Resource report to placement https://review.openstack.org/601150 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-12 | |||
| 03:28:12 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added Glance Client for Image downloading https://review.openstack.org/609906 | |
| 14:09:14 | openstackgerrit | Chuck Short proposed openstack/os-acc master: Change python3.5 job to python3.7 job on Stein+ https://review.openstack.org/610046 | |
| 14:09:40 | openstackgerrit | Chuck Short proposed openstack/os-acc master: Change python3.5 job to python3.7 job on Stein+ https://review.openstack.org/610046 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-14 | |||
| 04:14:35 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added Glance Client for Image downloading https://review.openstack.org/609906 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-15 | |||
| 15:09:18 | mriedem | i'm not sure if anyone here has put any thought into the upgrade checkers goal https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003657 | |
| 15:09:24 | mriedem | there are no upgrade release notes for cyborg | |
| 15:09:41 | mriedem | and with the project being so new, i don't know if it has had anything yet like even config option deprecation/removal | |
| 16:23:41 | openstackgerrit | Corey Bryant proposed openstack/os-acc master: Change python3.5 job to python3.7 job on Stein+ https://review.openstack.org/610046 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-16 | |||
| 05:40:52 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification for Cyborg API workflows for instance operations. https://review.openstack.org/608624 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-10-17 | |||
| 02:44:22 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added Glance Client for Image downloading https://review.openstack.org/609906 | |
| 14:03:16 | sum12 | meeting ? | |
| 14:05:10 | Li_Liu | yup | |
| 14:05:18 | Li_Liu | let's wait for few more min | |
| 14:06:18 | openstack | Meeting started Wed Oct 17 14:06:18 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Li_Liu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 14:06:18 | Li_Liu | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 14:06:19 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 14:06:21 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 14:06:29 | Li_Liu | #topic Roll Call | |
| 14:06:37 | Sundar | #info Sundar | |
| 14:06:38 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 14:06:51 | wangzhh | #info wangzhh | |
| 14:07:51 | Li_Liu | Let's wait for shaohe | |
| 14:08:07 | Sundar | What is the agenda? | |
| 14:08:32 | Li_Liu | We will go over all the pending patches and tasks. and discuss the demo plan for the summit | |
| 14:08:48 | Sundar | I'd like to bring up the need to get reviews for: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg-specs | |
| 14:09:00 | Sundar | Next week is Stein-1 milestone | |
| 14:09:30 | Li_Liu | yes | |
| 14:09:50 | Li_Liu | we should get the pending one merged as much as we could | |
| 14:11:18 | Li_Liu | ok, let's get started first | |
| 14:11:35 | Li_Liu | #topic Pending patches | |
| 14:11:51 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open%20project:openstack/cyborg | |
| 14:11:56 | Sundar | May be we can start with wangzhh's patch on drivers | |
| 14:12:16 | Sundar | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596691/ ? | |
| 14:12:30 | Li_Liu | Added Glance Client for Image downloading --- Please help review this so that we can merge. The summit demo needs this one | |
| 14:12:55 | wangzhh | Of course. My patch is based on ovo now. | |
| 14:13:38 | wangzhh | And Sundar, I have sent an email about your questions. Did u get it? | |
| 14:14:27 | Sundar | wangzhh: Sorry, don't remember seeing it. When was it sent? | |
| 14:15:03 | Li_Liu_ | I am back | |
| 14:15:04 | shaohe_feng | #info shaohe_feng_ | |
| 14:15:07 | Li_Liu_ | did I miss anything? | |
| 14:15:17 | Li_Liu_ | Hi shaohe | |
| 14:15:23 | shaohe_feng | morning Li_Liu_ | |
| 14:15:47 | wangzhh | SundarMaybe this morning for you. | |
| 14:16:19 | xinran | #info xinran | |
| 14:16:24 | xinran | Hi all | |
| 14:16:38 | Sundar | wangzhh: OK. I haven't got it yet. I see your new patch set and responses. Thanks. | |
| 14:16:41 | wangzhh | Hi, xinran shaohe. | |
| 14:18:16 | Li_Liu | back again.. | |
| 14:18:38 | Li_Liu | are we gonna merge Xinran's spec? | |
| 14:18:47 | Li_Liu | does it still depend on anything? | |
| 14:18:51 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Re. Glance client, I gave some reviews. Wondering why can't we just call Glance client directly? Do we need a wrapper? | |
| 14:19:09 | Sundar | Li_Liu: which spec? | |
| 14:19:20 | xinran | Li_Liu: | |
| 14:19:28 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597991/ | |
| 14:20:23 | xinran | Li_Liu: I have discussed with Sundar offline, the current solution after PTG is different with this one. | |
| 14:20:24 | Li_Liu | Sundar, of course, but I just wanna do it similar to Nova --> created a wrapper API for it | |
| 14:20:52 | Li_Liu | xinran: any plan on updating it? | |
| 14:22:15 | Li_Liu | did I drop? | |
| 14:22:24 | Li_Liu | ah.. i am good :) | |
| 14:22:29 | xinran | Sundar has a new spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603955/ in nova community | |
| 14:22:49 | Li_Liu | xinran, so that one will replace yours right? | |
| 14:23:04 | shaohe_feng | hi wangzhh | |
| 14:23:33 | xinran | yes in the future | |
| 14:23:49 | wangzhh | Didn't get the review email about this patch... | |
| 14:24:07 | shaohe_feng | seems I miss something | |
| 14:24:24 | shaohe_feng | something wrong with my net. | |
| 14:24:52 | shaohe_feng | no any message on the screen for a long time. | |
| 14:25:15 | Sundar | Thanks, Xinran. All, please review https://review.openstack.org/608624 . That is the proposed implementation (high-level design) of Cyborg APIs for Nova | |
| 14:25:43 | xinran | but you guys can use https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596187/ this API if it's urgent. It can works with nova, but of course need change code on nova side. | |
| 14:26:40 | Li_Liu__ | Sundar, could you help me run the meeting for now... my connection is so bad | |
| 14:26:53 | Li_Liu__ | I am going through all the patches in https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open%20project:openstack/cyborg | |
| 14:26:58 | wangzhh | xinran: So this patch should be abandoned? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597991/ | |
| 14:27:06 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Sure. NP. | |
| 14:29:00 | Sundar | Xinran: On https://review.openstack.org/#/c/601150/, this patch tries to create RP trees from the agent, IIUC. It is better to do it from the conductor | |
| 14:29:08 | Sundar | for the reasons we have discussed in the past | |
| 14:29:35 | Sundar | Also, it is desirable to have all db access from the conductor (and not from the agent) | |
| 14:29:52 | xinran | Hmmm, Sundar do you wanna continue work on this spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597991/ or you prefer to create a new one? | |
| 14:30:40 | Sundar | Xinran, I think this spec should be dropped -- that is a better use of your time and energy :) | |
| 14:31:01 | shaohe_feng | why dropped? | |
| 14:31:31 | Sundar | Shaohe: I already explained in the reviews. Basically, this is not in line with the Nova flow at all | |
| 14:32:03 | shaohe_feng | A patch is not perfect, every reviewers should give his comments and let the auther to improve it. | |
| 14:32:09 | shaohe_feng | that's the rule | |
| 14:32:30 | Sundar | I gave my comments | |
| 14:33:23 | Sundar | Think about how this even relates to the Nova spec | |
| 14:34:08 | shaohe_feng | so the summary of new cyborg design: | |
| 14:34:32 | shaohe_feng | 1. split the nova flavor to device profile | |
| 14:34:57 | shaohe_feng | 2. change the accelerator api to var api. | |
| 14:34:59 | xinran | Sundar: I can modify this spec according to your nova spec if you want once your spec is merged. | |
| 14:35:00 | shaohe_feng | right? | |
| 14:35:48 | xinran | Sundar: or you prefer to write a new one by yourself? | |
| 14:36:05 | Sundar | Xinran, Shaohe: we need to start with the Cyborg API signatures proposed for Nova, and work downwards into the details. That is what we do in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608624/ | |
| 14:36:51 | shaohe_feng | what is signatures? | |
| 14:37:34 | Sundar | Shaohe: API parameters, responses, HTTP return codes | |
| 14:38:53 | Sundar | Shahe: re. your question about 2 parts, the device profiles are an important part. So is the whole flow about creating VARs in an unbound state, then binding them, then attaching. | |
| 14:40:23 | Sundar | Aso, the device model where we map deployables to RPs, as we discussed last week | |
| 14:41:10 | shaohe_feng | I do not care you name is var or accelerator. | |
| 14:41:35 | Sundar | A VAR is not an accelerator. | |
| 14:41:54 | shaohe_feng | but as user var is puzzle, like vport. | |