Author: John Koziol
Posted: 2002-04-01 at 17:09:29
The Miami Herald paid to do the recount. AFAIK, no impartial recount of
any sort ever came out with Gore ahead.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Coleman [mailto:charliegc@lakesatredrock.net]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Multiple recipients of ProFox
Subject: Re: [OT] Why and How the Military Salutes President Bush
I'll try to find the reference when I have time. The ones that 'paid' to
complete the recount was some newspaper in Florida. Supposedly, it was a
newspaper that had supported Gore. They quietly published the results
that
Bush's lead had increased in their final count.
-Charlie
> > As it turns out, Bush's lead actually increased substantially in
> > the final tally (some newspaper paid for the remainder of the effort
> > to tally the votes - and that was the result - although it wasn't
> > publicized very well).
>
>As I recall, the kind of recount each side had asked for would have
>resulted in the opponent's victory, and the complete count of overvotes
>and undervotes (i.e. a complete recount) would have given the state to
>Gore.
>
>-Jerry Wolper
> Consult10@aol.com