Author: Mike
Posted: 2017-04-26 at 21:31:07
I use XFRX and it works well.
Probably the biggest difference is that XFRX is not free.
Mike Copeland
Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> I've been using FoxyPreviewer for a couple of years now and I love it.
> Haven't tried XFRX yet.
>
> Are there any advantages to one or the other?
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Schummer [mailto:profox@whitelightcomputing.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:48 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: VFP9 and Windows 10 PDF printer
>
> You might save yourself some time by looking at FoxyPreviewer
> (https://foxypreviewer.codeplex.com/) or XFRX (http://eqeus.com/), which
> make creating PDFs trivial.
>
> Rick
> White Light Computing, Inc.
>
> www.whitelightcomputing.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Mike
> McCann
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 05:37
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: VFP9 and Windows 10 PDF printer
>
> Anyone have experience with printing regular FRX reports to the Window 10
> PDF and directing to a file automatically (i.e. no user dialog)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Long time lurker,
>
> Mike
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/25033eae-ffae-12ab-367a-492f39759497@ggisoft.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.